• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高韩国患者获取新药的可及性:国家药物处方集系统的评估。

Improving Patient Access to New Drugs in South Korea: Evaluation of the National Drug Formulary System.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea.

Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Hoseo University, Asan 31499, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 21;16(2):288. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020288.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16020288
PMID:30669602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6352121/
Abstract

This study reviews and evaluates the national drug formulary system used to improve patient access to new drugs by making reimbursement decisions for new drugs as part of the South Korean national health insurance system. The national health insurance utilizes three methods for improving patient access to costly drugs: risk-sharing agreements, designation of essential drugs, and a waiver of cost-effectiveness analysis. Patients want reimbursement for new drugs to be processed quickly to improve their access to these drugs, whereas payers are careful about listing them given the associated financial burden and the uncertainty in cost-effectiveness. However, pharmaceutical companies are advocating for drug prices above certain thresholds to maintain global pricing strategies, cover the costs of drug development, and fund future investments into research and development. The South Korean government is expected to develop policies that will improve patient access to drugs with unmet needs for broadening health insurance coverage. Simultaneously, the designing of post-listing management methods is warranted for effectively managing the financial resources of the national health insurance system.

摘要

本研究回顾和评估了国家药物处方集系统,该系统通过对新纳入韩国国家健康保险系统的药品进行报销决策,以改善患者获得新药的机会。国家健康保险利用三种方法来提高患者获得昂贵药物的机会:风险分担协议、指定基本药物和免除成本效益分析。患者希望快速处理新药的报销,以改善他们获得这些药物的机会,而支付者则对将其列入考虑之列持谨慎态度,因为这涉及到相关的财务负担和成本效益的不确定性。然而,制药公司主张将药品价格定在一定阈值以上,以维持全球定价策略,覆盖药物开发成本,并为未来的研发投资提供资金。韩国政府有望制定改善对有未满足需求的药物的患者获得药物的政策,以扩大健康保险覆盖范围。同时,有必要设计上市后的管理方法,以有效管理国家健康保险系统的财务资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/6352121/e123f4659c6c/ijerph-16-00288-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/6352121/314143a8f7ab/ijerph-16-00288-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/6352121/60c5976bbce1/ijerph-16-00288-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/6352121/e123f4659c6c/ijerph-16-00288-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/6352121/314143a8f7ab/ijerph-16-00288-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/6352121/60c5976bbce1/ijerph-16-00288-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/6352121/e123f4659c6c/ijerph-16-00288-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving Patient Access to New Drugs in South Korea: Evaluation of the National Drug Formulary System.提高韩国患者获取新药的可及性:国家药物处方集系统的评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 21;16(2):288. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020288.
2
National reimbursement listing determinants of new cancer drugs: a retrospective analysis of 58 cancer treatment appraisals in 2007-2016 in South Korea.国家癌症新药报销目录的决定因素:对2007 - 2016年韩国58项癌症治疗评估的回顾性分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Aug;17(4):401-409. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1276828. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
3
Trends in the pricing and reimbursement of new anticancer drugs in South Korea: an analysis of listed anticancer drugs during the past three years.韩国新型抗癌药物的定价和报销趋势:过去三年上市抗癌药物的分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Jun;21(3):479-488. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1860023. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
Comparing patient access to pharmaceuticals in the UK and US.比较英国和美国患者获取药品的情况。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2006;5(3):177-87. doi: 10.2165/00148365-200605030-00004.
5
Eight-year experience of using HTA in drug reimbursement: South Korea.韩国药物报销中应用卫生技术评估的八年经验
Health Policy. 2016 Jun;120(6):612-20. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
6
A comparative analysis of the impact of a positive list system on new chemical entity drugs and incrementally modified drugs in South Korea.韩国对纳入正面清单的新化学实体药物和改良型新药的影响进行对比分析。
Clin Ther. 2011 Jul;33(7):926-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.05.089. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
7
Inter-provincial variation in government drug formularies.政府药品目录的省际差异。
Can J Public Health. 2001 Jul-Aug;92(4):307-12. doi: 10.1007/BF03404967.
8
An Industry Survey on Unmet Needs in South Korea's New Drug Listing System.韩国新药上市制度中未满足需求的行业调查
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):759-768. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00531-3. Epub 2023 May 14.
9
Role of Health Technology Assessment in Drug Policies: Korea.卫生技术评估在药物政策中的作用:韩国
Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 May;18:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
10
The current state of patient access to new drugs in South Korea under the positive list system: evaluation of the changes since the new review pathways.韩国积极药物清单制度下的新药患者可及性现状:新审查途径实施以来的变化评估。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Feb;21(1):119-126. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1758559. Epub 2020 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
An Empirical Analysis of Anti-Cancer Drug Lags in South Korea.韩国抗癌药物滞后现象的实证分析。
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251363855. doi: 10.1177/00469580251363855. Epub 2025 Aug 11.
2
Analysis of drug pricing drivers under South Korea's pharmaco-economic evaluation exemption policy (2015-2022).韩国药物经济学评估豁免政策(2015 - 2022年)下的药品定价驱动因素分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1519491. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1519491. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparative policy analysis of national rare disease funding policies in Australia, Singapore, South Korea, the United Kingdom and the United States: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing the ICERs in Medicine Reimbursement Submissions to NICE and PBAC-Does the Presence of an Explicit Threshold Affect the ICER Proposed?比较 NICE 和 PBAC 药品报销申请中的增量成本效果比——是否存在明确的阈值会影响提议的增量成本效果比?
Value Health. 2018 Aug;21(8):938-943. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.017. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
2
Use and Misuse of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Thresholds in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Trends in Cost-per-DALY Studies.中低收入国家成本效益分析阈值的使用和误用:成本效益分析研究中成本每残疾调整生命年的趋势。
Value Health. 2018 Jul;21(7):759-761. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.016. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
澳大利亚、新加坡、韩国、英国和美国国家罕见病资助政策的比较政策分析:一项范围综述
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jun 19;14(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00519-1.
4
Estimating the cost-effectiveness threshold of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China using mean opportunity cost and contingent valuation method.运用平均机会成本法和条件价值评估法估算中国晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本效益阈值。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Nov 2;21(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00487-z.
5
Using health technology assessment to inform insurance reimbursement of high technology medicines in China: an example of cancer immunotherapy.利用卫生技术评估为中国高新技术药品的保险报销提供信息:以癌症免疫治疗为例。
BMJ. 2023 Jun 15;381:e069963. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-069963.
6
Introduction of managed entry agreements in Korea: Problem, policy, and politics.韩国引入管理式准入协议:问题、政策与政治
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Apr 13;14:999220. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.999220. eCollection 2023.
7
Cell and gene therapy regulatory, pricing, and reimbursement framework: With a focus on South Korea and the EU.细胞和基因治疗监管、定价和报销框架:以韩国和欧盟为例。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;11:1109873. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1109873. eCollection 2023.
8
A Comparative Analysis of Anticancer Drug Appraisals Including Managed Entry Agreements in South Korea and England.韩国和英国含管理准入协议的抗癌药物评估的对比分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Mar;21(2):347-359. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00778-1. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
9
The Primary Process and Key Concepts of Economic Evaluation in Healthcare.医疗保健中的初级过程和经济评估的关键概念。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2022 Sep;55(5):415-423. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.22.195. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
10
How Do Iranian Stakeholders Think About Pharmaceutical Managed Entry Agreements?伊朗的利益相关者如何看待药品准入管理协议?
Iran J Pharm Res. 2022 May 4;21(1):e126916. doi: 10.5812/ijpr-126916. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Rationalizing the introduction and use of pharmaceutical products: The role of managed entry agreements in Central and Eastern European countries.
药品引进和使用的合理化:管理准入协议在中东欧国家的作用。
Health Policy. 2018 Mar;122(3):230-236. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
4
The financial burden and distress of patients with cancer: Understanding and stepping-up action on the financial toxicity of cancer treatment.癌症患者的经济负担和困境:了解并加强对癌症治疗的财务毒性的行动。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Mar;68(2):153-165. doi: 10.3322/caac.21443. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
5
A review of international coverage and pricing strategies for personalized medicine and orphan drugs.国际范围内个体化药物和孤儿药的覆盖范围和定价策略综述
Health Policy. 2017 Dec;121(12):1240-1248. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
6
Value-Based Pricing and Reimbursement in Personalised Healthcare: Introduction to the Basic Health Economics.个性化医疗中的价值定价与报销:基础卫生经济学导论
J Pers Med. 2017 Sep 4;7(3):10. doi: 10.3390/jpm7030010.
7
Do patient access schemes for high-cost cancer drugs deliver value to society?-lessons from the NHS Cancer Drugs Fund.高成本癌症药物的患者准入方案是否为社会带来了价值?——来自英国国家医疗服务体系癌症药物基金的经验教训。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1738-1750. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx110.
8
Societal perspective on access to publicly subsidised medicines: A cross sectional survey of 3080 adults in Australia.社会对获得公共补贴药品的看法:对澳大利亚3080名成年人的横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 1;12(3):e0172971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172971. eCollection 2017.
9
Funding therapies for rare diseases: an ethical dilemma with a potential solution.为罕见病提供资金支持的疗法:一个存在潜在解决方案的伦理困境。
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Feb;42(1):117-119. doi: 10.1071/AH16194.
10
Evaluating the Past, Present, and Future of Regenerative Medicine: A Global View.评估再生医学的过去、现在与未来:全球视野
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2017 Apr;23(2):199-210. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2016.0291. Epub 2016 Nov 21.