Bernat-Adell María Desamparados, Moles-Julio Pilar, Esteve-Clavero Aurora, Collado-Boira Eladio Joaquín
About the Authors The authors are faculty at Unidad Predepartamental de Enfermería, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón de la Plana, Spain. María Desamparados Bernat-Adell, PhD, MSc, RN, is a professor. Pilar Moles Julio, PhD, MSc, RN, is a professor. Aurora Esteve Clavero. PhD, MSc, RN, is a professor. Eladio Joaquín Collado Boira, PhD, MSc, RN, is a professor. The study described in this article is part of an Educational Innovation Project: Assessment Process, with the Code 3312/16. For more information, contact Dr. Bernat-Adell at
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2019 Mar/Apr;40(2):E3-E6. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000436.
This study was conducted to evaluate the psychometric properties of a rubric to assess nursing student performance in medium- and low-fidelity simulation.
A psychometric study was carried out. Content validity was explored by a group of experts. Internal consistency was determined by means of Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Interrater agreement and the level of concordance were established by the kappa coefficient and intraclass correlation index.
The relevance of the dimensions and the definition of each category scored higher than 3.25 on a Likert-type scale (maximum value of 4); content validity ratio values were close to +1. The kappa index was above 0.61 (p < .001) in all dimensions, thereby indicating a good level of interrater agreement; the intraclass correlation index showed values above .82 (p < .001).
The rubric appears to be psychometrically sound, thus supporting its reliability.
本研究旨在评估一个用于评估护理专业学生在中低仿真度模拟中表现的评分标准的心理测量特性。
开展了一项心理测量研究。由一组专家探讨内容效度。通过克朗巴赫α系数确定内部一致性。通过kappa系数和组内相关指数确定评分者间一致性和一致性水平。
各维度的相关性和每个类别的定义在李克特量表上的得分高于3.25（最大值为4）；内容效度比值接近+1。所有维度的kappa指数均高于0.61（p <.001），从而表明评分者间一致性良好；组内相关指数显示值高于.82（p <.001）。
该评分标准在心理测量方面似乎是合理的，从而支持其可靠性。
