• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Developing a behaviour rubric for the practical model of ethical behaviour for clinical nursing.制定临床护理伦理行为实践模型行为准则。
Nurs Open. 2023 Nov;10(11):7382-7393. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1992. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
2
Development and Validation of a Rubric to Evaluate Diabetes SOAP Note Writing in APPE.发展和验证用于评估 APPE 中糖尿病 SOAP 医嘱记录的评分表。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Nov;82(9):6725. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6725.
3
High inter-rater reliability of Japanese bedriddenness ranks and cognitive function scores: a hospital-based prospective observational study.日本卧床等级和认知功能评分的观察者间可靠性高:一项基于医院的前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 9;21(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02108-x.
4
Development of toileting behaviour evaluation for Japanese older patients using wheelchairs in a hospital setting: a validation study.在医院环境中为使用轮椅的日本老年患者开发排便行为评估工具:验证研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jun 6;23(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04069-9.
5
Bristol Rabbit Pain Scale (BRPS): clinical utility, validity and reliability.布里斯托兔疼痛量表(BRPS):临床实用性、有效性和可靠性。
BMC Vet Res. 2022 Sep 9;18(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03434-x.
6
Determination of Interrater Reliability of a Universal Evaluator Rubric to Assess Student Pharmacist Communication Skills.评估学生药剂师沟通技巧的通用评估者量表的评分者间信度的确定。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Jan;86(1):8544. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8544. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the Ethical Caring Competency Scale in nursing.护理中道德关怀能力量表的心理测量学评估。
BMC Nurs. 2022 May 3;21(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00886-2.
8
Reliability of the Japanese version of the Berg balance scale.日本版伯格平衡量表的可靠性。
Intern Med. 2014;53(15):1621-4. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.53.2662. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
9
Psychometric properties of a clinical reasoning assessment rubric for nursing education.护理教育临床推理评估量表的心理测量特性。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Sep 22;20(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00695-z.
10
Creating a healthy eating and active environment survey (CHEERS) for childcare: an inter-rater, intra-rater reliability and validity study.创建儿童保育健康饮食和积极环境调查 (CHEERS):一项评价者间、评价者内信度和效度研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 28;19(1):1384. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7719-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Translation and validation of the Japanese version of the measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals.医疗保健专业人员道德困境量表的日译及验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Apr 13;19(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01765-1.
2
Designing a Clinical Ethics Education Program for Nurses Based on the ADDIE Model.基于 ADDIE 模型的护士临床伦理教育方案设计。
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2020 Aug 1;34(3):205-222. doi: 10.1891/RTNP-D-19-00135.
3
Developing a moral compass: Themes from the Clinical Ethics Residency for Nurses' final essays.培养道德指南针:护士临床伦理住院医师最终论文的主题。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Feb;27(1):28-39. doi: 10.1177/0969733019833125. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
4
Nurses experiences of ethical dilemmas: A review.护士在伦理困境方面的体验:综述
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Feb;27(1):258-272. doi: 10.1177/0969733019832941. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
5
Nurses' professional values: Influences of experience and ethics education.护士的职业价值观:经验与道德教育的影响
J Clin Nurs. 2019 May;28(9-10):2009-2019. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14806. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
6
Health care reform in Iran: Implications for nurses' moral distress, patient rights, satisfaction and turnover intention.伊朗的医疗改革:对护士道德困境、患者权利、满意度和离职意愿的影响。
J Nurs Manag. 2019 Mar;27(2):396-403. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12699. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
7
Ethical dilemmas in nursing: An integrative review.护理伦理困境:综合述评。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Oct;27(19-20):3446-3461. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14542. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
8
Impact of ethical factors on job satisfaction among Korean nurses.伦理因素对韩国护士工作满意度的影响。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Jun;26(4):1186-1198. doi: 10.1177/0969733017742959. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
9
Relationship between moral distress and ethical climate with job satisfaction in nurses.护士职业满意度与道德困境和伦理氛围的关系。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Mar;26(2):346-356. doi: 10.1177/0969733017712083. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
10
Developing Abilities to Navigate Through the Grey Zones in Complex Environments: Nurses' Reasons for Applying to a Clinical Ethics Residency for Nurses.培养在复杂环境中应对灰色地带的能力:护士申请护士临床伦理住院医师项目的原因
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017 Jul;49(4):445-455. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12297. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

制定临床护理伦理行为实践模型行为准则。

Developing a behaviour rubric for the practical model of ethical behaviour for clinical nursing.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, University Hospital Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2023 Nov;10(11):7382-7393. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1992. Epub 2023 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.1992
PMID:37694450
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10563428/
Abstract

AIM

The present study aimed to develop an ethical behaviour rubric for nurses and evaluate its reliability and validity.

METHOD

This study was to designed to construct a rubric and evaluate the reliability and validity. The ethical behaviour rubric was distributed to 241 nurses and 154 were completed and returned. The intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for all 10 items on the ethical behaviour rubric, and the internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α. Construct validity was tested with explanatory factor analysis, and criterion validity was tested using the known-groups method.

RESULTS

Intra-rater reliability had a high interrater agreement (ICC = 0.9), and inter-rater reliability had a high interrater agreement (ICC = 0.84). The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.96. There was a linear correlation between the number of years of nursing experience and rubric scores p < 0.001. Exploratory factor analysis revealed 10 items loading on four factors. The result of factor analysis is that Cronbach's α was 0.93 for the first factor, 0.83 for the second factor, 0.91 for the third factor, and 0.77 for the fourth factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Our rubric was found to be a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of ethical behaviour among nurses in Japan.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在为护士制定伦理行为量表,并评估其信度和效度。

方法

本研究旨在构建一个量表,并评估其信度和效度。伦理行为量表分发给 241 名护士,其中 154 名完成并返回。对伦理行为量表的所有 10 个项目进行了内部一致性信度分析,采用 Cronbach's α 评估内部一致性信度。采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估所有 10 项的内部一致性信度和重测信度,采用 Cronbach's α 评估内部一致性信度。采用探索性因子分析检验结构效度,采用已知群体法检验效标效度。

结果

内部一致性信度的重测信度高(ICC=0.9),重测信度的重测信度高(ICC=0.84)。Cronbach's α 系数为 0.96。护理经验年限与量表评分呈线性相关(p<0.001)。探索性因子分析显示 10 个项目在四个因素上有负载。因子分析的结果是,第一个因素的 Cronbach's α 为 0.93,第二个因素的 Cronbach's α 为 0.83,第三个因素的 Cronbach's α 为 0.91,第四个因素的 Cronbach's α 为 0.77。

结论

我们的量表被发现是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于评估日本护士的伦理行为。