• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

进退维谷:人格如何调节社会规范对旅居者适应的影响。

A Tight Spot: How Personality Moderates the Impact of Social Norms on Sojourner Adaptation.

机构信息

1 Department of Psychology, University of Essex.

2 Department of Psychology, University of Maryland.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):333-342. doi: 10.1177/0956797618815488. Epub 2019 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1177/0956797618815488
PMID:30673368
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6419235/
Abstract

How do you navigate the norms of your new culture when living abroad? Taking an interactionist perspective, we examined how contextual factors and personality traits jointly affect sojourners' adaptation to the host-country culture. We hypothesized that tightness (strong, rigidly imposed norms) of the host culture would be associated with lower levels of adaptation and that tightness of the home culture would be associated with higher levels of adaptation. Further, we proposed that the impact of tightness should be dependent on personality traits associated with navigating social norms (agreeableness, conscientiousness, and honesty-humility). We analyzed longitudinal data from intercultural exchange students ( N = 889) traveling from and to 23 different countries. Multilevel modeling showed that sojourners living in a tighter culture had poorer adaptation than those in a looser culture. In contrast, sojourners originating from a tighter culture showed better adaptation. The negative effect of cultural tightness was moderated by agreeableness and honesty-humility but not conscientiousness.

摘要

当你在国外生活时,你如何适应新文化的规范?从互动主义的角度出发,我们研究了情境因素和个性特征如何共同影响旅居者对东道国文化的适应。我们假设,东道国文化的紧密程度(强烈、严格的规范)与适应水平较低有关,而母国文化的紧密程度与适应水平较高有关。此外,我们还提出,紧密程度的影响应该取决于与社会规范相适应的个性特征(宜人性、尽责性和诚实谦逊)。我们分析了来自 23 个不同国家的跨文化交流学生(N=889)的纵向数据。多层次模型显示,生活在文化较紧的国家的旅居者比生活在文化较松的国家的旅居者适应能力较差。相比之下,来自文化较紧的国家的旅居者表现出更好的适应能力。文化紧密程度的负面影响受到宜人性和诚实谦逊的调节,但不受尽责性的调节。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c50/6419235/7b51aaba4633/10.1177_0956797618815488-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c50/6419235/6a88939e711a/10.1177_0956797618815488-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c50/6419235/7b51aaba4633/10.1177_0956797618815488-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c50/6419235/6a88939e711a/10.1177_0956797618815488-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c50/6419235/7b51aaba4633/10.1177_0956797618815488-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
A Tight Spot: How Personality Moderates the Impact of Social Norms on Sojourner Adaptation.进退维谷:人格如何调节社会规范对旅居者适应的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):333-342. doi: 10.1177/0956797618815488. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
2
Why go the extra mile? A longitudinal study on sojourn goals and their impact on sojourners' adaptation.为何要付出额外努力?一项关于旅居目标及其对旅居者适应影响的纵向研究。
Int J Psychol. 2017 Dec;52(6):425-435. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12240. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
3
The highs and lows of a cultural transition: a longitudinal analysis of sojourner stress and adaptation across 50 countries.文化转型的起伏:对50个国家旅居者压力与适应的纵向分析
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Aug;109(2):316-337. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000046.
4
Quantifying cultural tightness-looseness in Ecuador.量化厄瓜多尔文化的松紧程度。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 29;16(1):e0246064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246064. eCollection 2021.
5
Sailing Uncharted Waters: Adolescent Personality Development and Social Relationship Experiences During a Year Abroad.探索未知水域:海外一年期间青少年的人格发展与社会关系体验
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Nov;45(11):2307-2320. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0479-1. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
6
Effects of bonding with parents and home culture on intercultural adaptations and the moderating role of genes.与父母及本土文化的联结对跨文化适应的影响及基因的调节作用。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 May 15;325(Pt B):223-236. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Feb 12.
7
The relationship between cultural tightness-looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: a global analysis.文化紧密-宽松度与 COVID-19 病例和死亡人数之间的关系:全球分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Mar;5(3):e135-e144. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30301-6. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
8
Alcohol attitudes, motives, norms, and personality traits longitudinally classify nondrinkers, moderate drinkers, and binge drinkers using discriminant function analysis.使用判别函数分析,从饮酒态度、动机、规范和人格特质方面对不饮酒者、适度饮酒者和暴饮者进行纵向分类。
Addict Behav. 2016 Oct;61:91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 10.
9
Cultural distances between home and host countries inspire sojourners to engage in intercultural exchange upon repatriation.文化距离在母国和东道国之间激发旅居者在回国后进行跨文化交流。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 16;13(1):17518. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44906-w.
10
The Strength of Social Norms Across Human Groups.社会规范在人类群体中的力量。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;12(5):800-809. doi: 10.1177/1745691617708631.

引用本文的文献

1
Are there potential costs for humility in a pluralistic democracy?: A longitudinal investigation of immigrants in the New Zealand attitudes and values study.在多元民主中谦逊是否存在潜在代价?:对新西兰态度与价值观研究中移民的纵向调查。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 14;15:1401182. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1401182. eCollection 2024.
2
The role of psychologists in international migration research: Complementing other expertise and an interdisciplinary way forward.心理学家在国际移民研究中的作用:补充其他专业知识及跨学科的前进方向。
Migr Stud. 2022 Jun;10(2):356-373. doi: 10.1093/migration/mnz054. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
3
Motivational Understanding of MOOC Learning: The Impacts of Technology Fit and Subjective Norms.

本文引用的文献

1
Advancing acculturation theory and research: the acculturation process in its ecological context.推进文化适应理论与研究:生态背景下的文化适应过程
Curr Opin Psychol. 2016 Apr;8:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.021. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
2
The role of gamma interbrain synchrony in social coordination when humans face territorial threats.γ 脑区同步在人类面对领土威胁时的社会协调中的作用。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Oct 1;12(10):1614-1623. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx093.
3
The highs and lows of a cultural transition: a longitudinal analysis of sojourner stress and adaptation across 50 countries.
对慕课学习的动机性理解:技术适配与主观规范的影响
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jan 23;13(2):98. doi: 10.3390/bs13020098.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation of Chinese students in the United States: Acculturation strategies, sociocultural, psychological, and academic adaptation.中国学生在美国的跨文化适应:文化适应策略、社会文化、心理和学业适应。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 4;13:924561. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924561. eCollection 2022.
5
Facilitating Cross-Cultural Adaptation: A Meta-Analytic Review of Dispositional Predictors of Expatriate Adjustment.促进跨文化适应:外派人员适应的性格预测因素的元分析综述
J Cross Cult Psychol. 2022 Oct;53(9):1054-1096. doi: 10.1177/00220221221109559. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
6
Profile of Michele J. Gelfand.米歇尔·J·格尔范德简介。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 May 10;119(19):e2205045119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2205045119. Epub 2022 May 6.
7
Returning home: The role of expectations in re-entry adaptation.返家:期望在重新融入适应中的作用。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2022 Aug;14(3):949-966. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12361. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
8
Crossing the rice-wheat border: Not all intra-cultural adaptation is equal.跨越稻麦边界:并非所有文化内适应都是平等的。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0236326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236326. eCollection 2020.
9
Historically rice-farming societies have tighter social norms in China and worldwide.历史上,中国乃至全世界的稻作社会都有着更严格的社会规范。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 18;117(33):19816-19824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909909117. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
10
Short stay, long impact: ecological footprints of sojourners.短期停留,深远影响:旅居者的生态足迹。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(11):11797-11808. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07700-z. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
文化转型的起伏:对50个国家旅居者压力与适应的纵向分析
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Aug;109(2):316-337. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000046.
4
Tightness-looseness across the 50 united states.50 个州的紧松度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 3;111(22):7990-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317937111. Epub 2014 May 19.
5
Multicultural experiences reduce intergroup bias through epistemic unfreezing.多元文化体验通过认知解冻减少群体间偏见。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Nov;103(5):750-72. doi: 10.1037/a0029719. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
6
Getting the most out of living abroad: biculturalism and integrative complexity as key drivers of creative and professional success.充分发挥在国外生活的优势:双文化主义和整体复杂性是创造性和职业成功的关键驱动力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Sep;103(3):520-42. doi: 10.1037/a0029360. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
7
Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study.紧密文化和松散文化的差异:一项 33 国研究。
Science. 2011 May 27;332(6033):1100-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1197754.
8
Socioeconomic Status, Family Processes, and Individual Development.社会经济地位、家庭环境与个体发展。
J Marriage Fam. 2010 Jun;72(3):685-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00725.x.
9
The HEXACO-60: a short measure of the major dimensions of personality.人格的大六因素问卷(HEXACO-60):一种简短的人格主要维度测量工具。
J Pers Assess. 2009 Jul;91(4):340-5. doi: 10.1080/00223890902935878.
10
Cultural borders and mental barriers: the relationship between living abroad and creativity.文化边界与心理障碍:旅居国外与创造力之间的关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 May;96(5):1047-61. doi: 10.1037/a0014861.