• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结构决定因素对非裔美国女性怀孕意愿和生殖决策的影响。

The Impact of Structural Determinants on Pregnancy Intention and Reproductive Decision-Making Among African American Women.

作者信息

Strickland Denson Jill

机构信息

Prevention Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 May 19. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02459-w.

DOI:10.1007/s40615-025-02459-w
PMID:40388074
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

African American women face significant reproductive health inequities rooted in structural and social factors, though few studies have directly engaged them to examine how such factors play a role in their reproductive decision-making. This study draws from a methodology underused in reproductive health research to understand how African American women of different socioeconomic groups approach reproductive decision-making.

METHODS

The study employed group concepting mapping (GCM), a participatory, mixed-methods design that integrates qualitative processes with multivariate analyses. Twenty-four African American women between 18 and 44 years were recruited into lower (n = 12) and higher (n = 12) income groups. Based on GCM methods, each group engaged in the participatory data collection analysis process across three sessions. GCM software was used to generate visualizations, such as pattern match maps and go-zones, to identify themes.

RESULTS

Participants described experiences with trauma, depression, stress, and everyday interaction with discrimination. Three themes emerged from the GCM process: inward reflection (autonomy in reproductive decision-making, prioritizing career and education, and pressure to push through adversity), relational reflection (expectations of sexual partners in reproductive trajectories), and outward reflection (judgement from providers, reproductive coercion in healthcare systems). Each theme influenced participants' pregnancy trajectories and reproductive decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants reported high importance of self-reflection, career and education, and low importance of male partners, when considering whether to pursue pregnancy, prevent pregnancy, and/or use contraception. Findings illustrate participants' reproductive health experiences were impacted by structural and social determinants. Results help document opportunities for policies and practices to attend to structural determinants versus individuals' reproductive trajectories.

摘要

引言

非裔美国女性面临着源于结构和社会因素的重大生殖健康不平等问题,尽管很少有研究直接让她们参与进来,以考察这些因素在她们的生殖决策中如何发挥作用。本研究采用了生殖健康研究中未充分利用的一种方法,以了解不同社会经济群体的非裔美国女性如何进行生殖决策。

方法

该研究采用了群体概念映射法(GCM),这是一种参与式混合方法设计,将定性过程与多变量分析相结合。招募了24名年龄在18至44岁之间的非裔美国女性,分为低收入组(n = 12)和高收入组(n = 12)。基于GCM方法,每个组在三个阶段参与了参与式数据收集分析过程。使用GCM软件生成可视化结果,如图案匹配图和可行区域,以识别主题。

结果

参与者描述了创伤、抑郁、压力以及日常遭遇歧视的经历。GCM过程中出现了三个主题:向内反思(生殖决策中的自主性、优先考虑职业和教育以及克服逆境的压力)、关系反思(性伴侣在生殖轨迹方面的期望)和向外反思(来自医疗服务提供者的评判、医疗系统中的生殖胁迫)。每个主题都影响了参与者的怀孕轨迹和生殖决策。

结论

在考虑是否怀孕、预防怀孕和/或使用避孕措施时,参与者报告自我反思、职业和教育非常重要,而男性伴侣的重要性较低。研究结果表明,参与者的生殖健康经历受到结构和社会决定因素的影响。研究结果有助于记录政策和实践关注结构决定因素而非个人生殖轨迹的机会。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Structural Determinants on Pregnancy Intention and Reproductive Decision-Making Among African American Women.结构决定因素对非裔美国女性怀孕意愿和生殖决策的影响。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 May 19. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02459-w.
2
Contraceptive and Pregnancy Decision-Making Autonomy and Health Care Experiences Among Women With Intellectual Disabilities.智力残疾女性的避孕与妊娠决策自主权及医疗保健经历
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2025 Apr;69(4):274-282. doi: 10.1111/jir.13207. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
3
Racial Differences in Pregnancy Intention, Reproductive Coercion, and Partner Violence among Family Planning Clients: A Qualitative Exploration.计划生育服务对象中种族差异与怀孕意愿、生殖胁迫和伴侣暴力:定性探讨。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 May-Jun;28(3):205-211. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
4
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
5
Race and reproductive coercion: a qualitative assessment.种族与生殖胁迫:一项质性评估
Womens Health Issues. 2015 May-Jun;25(3):216-23. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Contraceptive decision-making through the lens of social determinants of health among female sex workers: A qualitative descriptive study.从健康社会决定因素角度看性工作者的避孕决策:定性描述性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 May;79(5):1898-1911. doi: 10.1111/jan.15651. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
8
Reproductive decision-making and determinants of contraceptive use in HIV-infected women.HIV感染女性的生殖决策及避孕措施使用的决定因素
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jun;39(2):333-43. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199606000-00008.
9
Heterosexual female adolescents' decision-making about sexual intercourse and pregnancy in rural Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省农村地区异性恋女性青少年关于性行为和怀孕的决策。
Rural Remote Health. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):3664. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
10
Qualitative Study定性研究

本文引用的文献

1
Does Hypersegregation Matter for Black-White Socioeconomic Disparities?是否存在过度隔离会影响黑-白社会经济差距?
Demography. 2019 Dec;56(6):2169-2191. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00825-y.
2
Quantifying intersectionality: An important advancement for health inequality research.量化交叉性:健康不平等研究的重要进展。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:246-248. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.036. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
3
The Intersectional Discrimination Index: Development and validation of measures of self-reported enacted and anticipated discrimination for intercategorical analysis.
交叉歧视指数:用于跨类别分析的自我报告实施和预期歧视测量的开发和验证。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:225-235. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.016. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
4
Racism, African American Women, and Their Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Review of Historical and Contemporary Evidence and Implications for Health Equity.种族主义、非裔美国女性及其性与生殖健康:历史与当代证据综述及对健康公平的影响
Health Equity. 2018 Sep 24;2(1):249-259. doi: 10.1089/heq.2017.0045. eCollection 2018.
5
Ensuring our research reflects our values: The role of family planning research in advancing reproductive autonomy.确保我们的研究体现我们的价值观:计划生育研究在促进生殖自主权方面的作用。
Contraception. 2018 Jul;98(1):4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
6
Controlling images: How awareness of group stereotypes affects Black women's well-being.控制形象:群体刻板印象意识如何影响黑人女性的福祉。
J Couns Psychol. 2017 Oct;64(5):487-499. doi: 10.1037/cou0000233.
7
Exploring the social determinants of racial/ethnic disparities in prenatal care utilization and maternal outcome.探讨产前护理利用和母婴结局方面种族/民族差异的社会决定因素。
Semin Perinatol. 2017 Aug;41(5):308-317. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
8
Rethinking the Pregnancy Planning Paradigm: Unintended Conceptions or Unrepresentative Concepts?重新思考妊娠规划模式:意外受孕还是不具代表性的观念?
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Sep;48(3):147-51. doi: 10.1363/48e10316. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
9
Planning parenthood: Health care providers' perspectives on pregnancy intention, readiness, and family planning.计划生育:医疗保健提供者对妊娠意愿、准备情况和计划生育的看法。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Aug;139:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.027. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
10
Racial and ethnic disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality.孕产妇发病和死亡方面的种族和族裔差异。
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;125(3):690-694. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000704.