Leroux Timothy S, Zuke William A, Saltzman Bryan M, Go Beatrice, Verma Nikhil N, Romeo Anthony A, Hurst Jason, Forsythe Brian
University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
JSES Open Access. 2018 Feb 15;2(1):13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2017.11.002. eCollection 2018 Mar.
There is increasing interest in outpatient shoulder arthroplasty (SA); however, the clinical evidence behind this practice is sparse. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of outpatient SA performed in an ambulatory surgery center and to determine patient factors that are associated with increased risk for perioperative complications or dissatisfaction.
Patient demographics and operative variables were collected retrospectively for patients undergoing outpatient SA at 2 ambulatory surgery centers with a minimum follow-up of 90 days. Patients completed a postsurgery questionnaire about their experience, satisfaction, pain control, and health care use.
Forty-one anatomic total SAs (n = 32) and reverse SAs (n = 9) with a mean follow-up of 60 weeks (16.4 weeks-3 years) were included. The mean age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class were 60.6 ± 4.8 years, 31.8 ± 6.6, 2.9 ± 1.9, and 2.3 ± 0.6, respectively. Three (7.3%) minor complications occurred within 90 days of the SA, none before first follow-up. Two patients stayed in the ambulatory surgery center 23-hour observation unit. Thirty-five patients (85.4%) completed the questionnaire, of whom 97.0% (n = 32) were satisfied with the outpatient procedure. Two patients had difficulties with postoperative pain control and were taking chronic narcotic medication before surgery.
Outpatient SA in an ambulatory surgery center is safe with high patient satisfaction and low rates of perioperative complications. Although larger cohorts are required to adequately determine which patients will be appropriate candidates for an outpatient SA, our findings do suggest that patients with a history of preoperative narcotic use may have difficulties or dissatisfaction with outpatient SA.
门诊肩关节置换术(SA)越来越受到关注;然而,这种手术背后的临床证据却很少。本研究的目的是评估在门诊手术中心进行门诊SA的安全性,并确定与围手术期并发症风险增加或不满意相关的患者因素。
回顾性收集在2个门诊手术中心接受门诊SA的患者的人口统计学和手术变量,随访时间至少为90天。患者完成了一份关于他们的经历、满意度、疼痛控制和医疗保健使用情况的术后问卷。
纳入41例解剖型全肩关节置换术(n = 32)和反置肩关节置换术(n = 9),平均随访60周(16.4周 - 3年)。平均年龄、体重指数、Charlson合并症指数和美国麻醉医师协会分级分别为60.6±4.8岁、31.8±6.6、2.9±1.9和2.3±0.6。3例(7.3%)轻微并发症发生在SA术后90天内,首次随访前无并发症发生。2例患者在门诊手术中心的23小时观察病房留观。35例患者(85.4%)完成了问卷,其中97.0%(n = 32)对门诊手术满意。2例患者术后疼痛控制困难,术前正在服用慢性麻醉药物。
在门诊手术中心进行门诊SA是安全的,患者满意度高,围手术期并发症发生率低。虽然需要更大规模的队列研究来充分确定哪些患者适合门诊SA,但我们的研究结果确实表明,有术前使用麻醉药物史的患者可能在门诊SA中遇到困难或不满意。