Denard Patrick J, Noyes Matthew P, Lädermann Alexandre
Southern Oregon Orthopedics, Medford, OR, USA.
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
JSES Open Access. 2018 Dec 18;2(4):205-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2018.08.003. eCollection 2018 Dec.
This study compared the biomechanical properties of a new lesser tuberosity (LTO) repair with a tensionable construct with suture tape and preplaced racking hitches vs. a traditional LTO repair using 4 high-strength sutures. The hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the 2 constructs.
LTO repairs were performed on 6 matched, paired cadaveric shoulders after placement of an uncemented humeral stem. The LTO in group 1 was repaired with 4 high-strength #2 sutures, each passed individually through the subscapularis tendon. The LTO in group 2 was repaired with 2 suture tape loops with a preplaced racking hitch knot and 2 passes through the subscapularis tendon. All sutures were passed around the humeral stem before passing through the subscapularis tendon. The specimens then underwent cyclic displacement and load-to-failure testing.
Load to failure was 209.6 ± 71.2 N in group 1 compared with 502.8 ± 168.6 N in group 2 ( = .018). There was no difference in displacement between the 2 groups. All failures in group 1 occurred by knot slippage. The mode of failure in group 2 was tendon tearing in 5 of 6 cases.
A simplified LTO repair with suture tape and compression bridge and a preplaced half racking knot achieves favorable biomechanical properties in a technically efficient manner that may be useful clinically.
本研究比较了一种新型小粗隆(LTO)修复术(使用可张紧结构的缝线带和预放置的套圈结)与传统LTO修复术(使用4根高强度缝线)的生物力学特性。假设是这两种结构之间没有差异。
在植入非骨水泥型肱骨干后,对6对匹配的尸体肩部进行LTO修复。第1组的LTO用4根高强度2号缝线修复,每根缝线单独穿过肩胛下肌腱。第2组的LTO用2个带有预放置套圈结的缝线带环和2次穿过肩胛下肌腱进行修复。所有缝线在穿过肩胛下肌腱之前均绕过肱骨干。然后对标本进行循环位移和破坏载荷测试。
第1组的破坏载荷为209.6±71.2 N,而第2组为502.8±168.6 N(P = 0.018)。两组之间的位移没有差异。第1组所有的失败均由结滑移导致。第2组6例中有5例的失败模式为肌腱撕裂。
使用缝线带、加压桥和预放置的半套圈结进行简化的LTO修复,以技术上有效的方式实现了良好的生物力学特性,这在临床上可能是有用的。