Suppr超能文献

一种用于肩关节置换术后肩胛下肌修复的可张紧方法。

A Tensionable Method for Subscapularis Repair after Shoulder Arthroplasty.

作者信息

Denard Patrick J, Noyes Matthew P, Lädermann Alexandre

机构信息

Southern Oregon Orthopedics, Medford, OR, USA.

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

JSES Open Access. 2018 Dec 18;2(4):205-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2018.08.003. eCollection 2018 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compared the biomechanical properties of a new lesser tuberosity (LTO) repair with a tensionable construct with suture tape and preplaced racking hitches vs. a traditional LTO repair using 4 high-strength sutures. The hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the 2 constructs.

METHODS

LTO repairs were performed on 6 matched, paired cadaveric shoulders after placement of an uncemented humeral stem. The LTO in group 1 was repaired with 4 high-strength #2 sutures, each passed individually through the subscapularis tendon. The LTO in group 2 was repaired with 2 suture tape loops with a preplaced racking hitch knot and 2 passes through the subscapularis tendon. All sutures were passed around the humeral stem before passing through the subscapularis tendon. The specimens then underwent cyclic displacement and load-to-failure testing.

RESULTS

Load to failure was 209.6 ± 71.2 N in group 1 compared with 502.8 ± 168.6 N in group 2 ( = .018). There was no difference in displacement between the 2 groups. All failures in group 1 occurred by knot slippage. The mode of failure in group 2 was tendon tearing in 5 of 6 cases.

CONCLUSION

A simplified LTO repair with suture tape and compression bridge and a preplaced half racking knot achieves favorable biomechanical properties in a technically efficient manner that may be useful clinically.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了一种新型小粗隆(LTO)修复术(使用可张紧结构的缝线带和预放置的套圈结)与传统LTO修复术(使用4根高强度缝线)的生物力学特性。假设是这两种结构之间没有差异。

方法

在植入非骨水泥型肱骨干后,对6对匹配的尸体肩部进行LTO修复。第1组的LTO用4根高强度2号缝线修复,每根缝线单独穿过肩胛下肌腱。第2组的LTO用2个带有预放置套圈结的缝线带环和2次穿过肩胛下肌腱进行修复。所有缝线在穿过肩胛下肌腱之前均绕过肱骨干。然后对标本进行循环位移和破坏载荷测试。

结果

第1组的破坏载荷为209.6±71.2 N,而第2组为502.8±168.6 N(P = 0.018)。两组之间的位移没有差异。第1组所有的失败均由结滑移导致。第2组6例中有5例的失败模式为肌腱撕裂。

结论

使用缝线带、加压桥和预放置的半套圈结进行简化的LTO修复,以技术上有效的方式实现了良好的生物力学特性,这在临床上可能是有用的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699a/6334854/2ddf196c5259/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验