Phillips Cameron, Pasqualini Ignacio, Barros Hugo, Menendez Mariano E, Horinek Jeffrey L, Ardebol Javier, Denard Patrick J
Oregon Shoulder Institute, Medford, OR 97504, USA.
Instituto de Hombro, Av. Rodrigo de Chávez Oe2-115, Quito 170104, Ecuador.
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 20;12(3):834. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030834.
This study compared the healing rates of lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), repaired with either standard knot tying or a tensionable construct. Second, we evaluated LTO healing in stemmed and stemless prostheses and identified the patient characteristics associated with healing.
An analysis of consecutive primary TSAs approached with an LTO performed by a single surgeon between 2016 and 2020 was conducted. In the first two years of the study period, the LTOs were repaired with four #2 polyblend sutures passed through drill tunnels and around a short press-fit stem, followed by manual knot tying. Subsequently, a tensionable construct with suture tapes (TCB) was universally adopted. The radiographic appearance of the LTO was evaluated at a minimum of six months postoperatively.
A total of 340 patients met the study criteria, including 168 with manual knot tying, 84 TCB repairs with a stemmed implant, and 88 TCB repairs with a stemless implant. There was no difference in the baseline demographics between the groups. The LTO healing rate of the manual knot tying group (85%) was lower than that of the stemmed (95%) and stemless (98%) TCB groups ( < 0.001). When directly comparing the LTO healing between the stemmed and stemless TCB groups, the differences were not significant ( = 0.44). Across all constructs, the body mass index (BMI) was higher in the displaced nonunion group ( = 0.04), with a failure rate of 9.4% for a BMI between 30 and 40, 12.5% for a BMI between 40 and 50, and 28.6% for a BMI > 50. The rate of tobacco use was higher in the displaced nonunion group ( = 0.037).
A tensionable construct improves LTO healing compared to manual knot tying, irrespective of the implant type. In addition to the surgical technique, the patient factors that influence tuberosity healing include a greater BMI and tobacco use.
Level III, retrospective comparative study.
本研究比较了在解剖型全肩关节置换术(TSA)中,采用标准打结或可张紧结构修复的小粗隆截骨术(LTO)的愈合率。其次,我们评估了有柄和无柄假体中LTO的愈合情况,并确定了与愈合相关的患者特征。
对2016年至2020年间由单一外科医生进行的连续原发性TSA并采用LTO的病例进行分析。在研究期的前两年,LTO采用4根#2聚混缝线穿过钻孔隧道并环绕短压配式柄进行修复,随后手动打结。随后,普遍采用带缝线带的可张紧结构(TCB)。术后至少6个月评估LTO的影像学表现。
共有340例患者符合研究标准,包括168例采用手动打结,84例采用带柄植入物的TCB修复,88例采用无柄植入物的TCB修复。各组间基线人口统计学特征无差异。手动打结组的LTO愈合率(85%)低于带柄(95%)和无柄(98%)TCB组(<0.001)。直接比较带柄和无柄TCB组之间的LTO愈合情况时,差异不显著(=0.44)。在所有结构中,移位不愈合组的体重指数(BMI)较高(=0.04),BMI在30至40之间的失败率为9.4%,BMI在40至50之间的失败率为12.5%,BMI>50的失败率为28.6%。移位不愈合组的吸烟率较高(=0.037)。
与手动打结相比,可张紧结构可提高LTO的愈合率,与植入物类型无关。除手术技术外,影响粗隆愈合的患者因素包括较高的BMI和吸烟。
III级,回顾性比较研究。