Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Group Practice Asklepios, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Barneveld, The Netherlands.
Diabet Med. 2019 Oct;36(10):1199-1208. doi: 10.1111/dme.13908. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
To investigate the incidence of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
In most countries, yearly or biennial screening intervals for diabetic retinopathy in people with Type 2 diabetes are recommended. Fewer screening sessions reduce the effort required of people with Type 2 diabetes and reduce healthcare costs.
We conducted a search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the COCHRANE Library for studies published betweeen 1 January 2000 and 1 January 2017. Eligible studies were those that included general populations of >100 people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Additional study population criteria were absence of moderate diabetic retinopathy or more severe diabetic retinopathy at last screening session and at least two gradable retinal screening sessions. Outcomes of interest in the included studies were moderate and severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (R2), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (R3) or maculopathy (M1), collectively known as sight-threatening or referable diabetic retinopathy.
A total of 17 studies were included. In people with Type 2 diabetes without or with only mild diabetic retinopathy at baseline, the average incidence rates of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy were ~1 per 100 person-years and ~8 per 100 person-years, respectively. The average numbers needed to screen to detect one case of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy were 175 and 19 in people without and with mild retinopathy at last screening, respectively.
In people with Type 2 diabetes without retinopathy at last screening, the incidence of severe sight-threatening retinopathy at the subsequent screening session was low. In people with mild retinopathy, progression to sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy was nearly 10-fold higher. This review supports lengthening of the screening interval of patients with Type 2 diabetes without retinopathy at last screening session.
调查 2 型糖尿病患者中威胁视力的糖尿病视网膜病变的发生率。
在大多数国家,建议对 2 型糖尿病患者进行每年或每两年一次的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查。减少筛查次数可以减少 2 型糖尿病患者的工作量,并降低医疗保健成本。
我们对 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 COCHRANE 图书馆进行了检索,以查找 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 1 月 1 日期间发表的研究。符合条件的研究包括>100 名 2 型糖尿病患者的一般人群。另外,研究人群的标准为上次筛查时没有中度糖尿病视网膜病变或更严重的糖尿病视网膜病变,并且至少有两次可分级的视网膜筛查。纳入研究的主要结局为中度和重度非增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(R2)、增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(R3)或黄斑病变(M1),统称为威胁视力或可转诊的糖尿病视网膜病变。
共纳入 17 项研究。在基线时无或仅有轻度糖尿病视网膜病变的 2 型糖尿病患者中,威胁视力的糖尿病视网膜病变的平均发生率分别约为每 100 人年 1 例和每 100 人年 8 例。在末次筛查时无和仅有轻度视网膜病变的患者中,每发现 1 例威胁视力的糖尿病视网膜病变分别需要筛查的人数分别为 175 人和 19 人。
在末次筛查时无视网膜病变的 2 型糖尿病患者中,下一次筛查时严重威胁视力的视网膜病变发生率较低。在轻度视网膜病变患者中,进展为威胁视力的糖尿病视网膜病变的风险几乎增加了 10 倍。本综述支持延长末次筛查时无视网膜病变的 2 型糖尿病患者的筛查间隔。