• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

航运生物燃料的归因生命周期评估:解决替代地理位置和种植系统问题。

Attributional life cycle assessment of biofuels for shipping: Addressing alternative geographical locations and cultivation systems.

机构信息

School of Engineering and Technology, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK; School of Engineering and Marine Science, Newcastle University, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.

School of Engineering and Marine Science, Newcastle University, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2019 Apr 1;235:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.036. Epub 2019 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.036
PMID:30677660
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a life cycle assessment of straight vegetable oil (SVO) and biodiesel addressing alternative upstream pathways. The pathways are SVO and biodiesel produced in the United Kingdom (UK) using European rapeseed and also, SVO and biodiesel produced in the UK using soybean grain and soybean oil imported from Argentina. Four environmental impact categories have been assessed using the SimaPro (ReCiPe life-cycle impact assessment) method: this includes global warming potential (GWP); acidification; eutrophication and particulate matter. Rapeseed based biofuel had the lowest emission impact in terms of GHG emissions. Significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can result from land use change due to the expansion and cultivation of soybean in Argentina. When land use change is not considered, the soy based biofuel system has the lowest GHG impact with more than 70% GHG emission reduction. The GHG emission at cultivation stage far outweighs the impacts of the other life-cycle stages irrespective of the feedstock used for the biofuel production systems. The use of fertilizers and associated soil emissions are the main contributors. The environmental impacts of biofuel can be reduced by avoiding land use change, improving soil management practices and yield, and also optimizing transportation routes. Effective implementation of options for biofuels production were explored to improve sustainability in shipping.

摘要

本研究旨在评估直链植物油(SVO)和生物柴油的生命周期评估,以解决替代上游途径的问题。这些途径是在英国(UK)使用欧洲油菜籽生产的 SVO 和生物柴油,以及在英国使用从阿根廷进口的大豆谷物和豆油生产的 SVO 和生物柴油。使用 SimaPro(ReCiPe 生命周期影响评估)方法评估了四个环境影响类别:这包括全球变暖潜力(GWP);酸化;富营养化和颗粒物。就温室气体排放而言,油菜籽基生物燃料的排放影响最低。由于阿根廷大豆的扩张和种植,土地利用变化可能导致大量温室气体(GHG)排放。不考虑土地利用变化时,基于大豆的生物燃料系统的温室气体影响最低,温室气体排放量减少了 70%以上。无论用于生物燃料生产系统的原料如何,在种植阶段的温室气体排放都远远超过其他生命周期阶段的影响。化肥和相关土壤排放是主要贡献者。通过避免土地利用变化、改善土壤管理实践和产量,以及优化运输路线,可以减少生物燃料的环境影响。为了提高航运的可持续性,探索了生物燃料生产的有效实施选择。

相似文献

1
Attributional life cycle assessment of biofuels for shipping: Addressing alternative geographical locations and cultivation systems.航运生物燃料的归因生命周期评估:解决替代地理位置和种植系统问题。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Apr 1;235:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.036. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
2
Life cycle assessment of first-generation biofuels using a nitrogen crop model.基于氮素作物模型的第一代生物燃料生命周期评价。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Feb 1;505:1191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.061. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
3
Assessing the greenhouse gas emissions of Brazilian soybean biodiesel production.评估巴西大豆生物柴油生产的温室气体排放。
PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0176948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176948. eCollection 2017.
4
Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission effects of biodiesel in the United States with induced land use change impacts.美国生物柴油生命周期能源与温室气体排放效应及其引发的土地利用变化影响。
Bioresour Technol. 2018 Mar;251:249-258. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.031. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
5
Biofuel Options for Marine Applications: Technoeconomic and Life-Cycle Analyses.海洋应用的生物燃料选择:技术经济和生命周期分析。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Jun 1;55(11):7561-7570. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06141. Epub 2021 May 17.
6
Total environmental impacts of biofuels from corn stover using a hybrid life cycle assessment model combining process life cycle assessment and economic input-output life cycle assessment.使用结合过程生命周期评估和经济投入产出生命周期评估的混合生命周期评估模型对玉米秸秆生物燃料的总体环境影响。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2018 Jan;14(1):139-149. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1969. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
7
Spatial and life cycle assessment of bioenergy-driven land-use changes in Ireland.爱尔兰生物能源驱动的土地利用变化的空间和生命周期评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 May 10;664:262-275. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.397. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
8
Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Biodiesel and Renewable Diesel Production in the United States.美国生物柴油和可再生柴油生产的生命周期温室气体排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Jun 21;56(12):7512-7521. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c00289. Epub 2022 May 16.
9
Biochar potentially mitigates greenhouse gas emissions from cultivation of oilseed rape for biodiesel.生物炭可能减轻用于生物柴油生产的油菜种植的温室气体排放。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jun 25;671:180-188. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.257. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
10
A geographical assessment of vegetation carbon stocks and greenhouse gas emissions on potential microalgae-based biofuel facilities in the United States.对美国潜在微藻生物燃料设施的植被碳储量和温室气体排放的地理评估。
Bioresour Technol. 2016 Dec;221:270-275. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Environmental sustainability of biofuels: a review.生物燃料的环境可持续性:综述
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Nov;476(2243):20200351. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0351. Epub 2020 Nov 25.