Australian Rivers Institute, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia.
Australian Rivers Institute, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 20;657:1480-1490. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.106. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) are frequently detected in drinking water sources. This raises concerns about the formation of potentially more toxic transformation products (TPs) after drinking water disinfection. This study applied a combination of computational and experimental methods to investigate the biological activity of eight EDCs and PPCPs commonly detected in source waters (acetaminophen, bisphenol A, carbamazepine, estrone, 17α-ethinylestradiol, gemfibrozil, naproxen and triclosan) before and after disinfection. Using a Stepped Forced Molecular Dynamics (SFMD) method, we detected 911 unique TPs, 36% of which have been previously reported in the scientific literature. We calculated the likelihood that TPs would cause damage to biomolecules or DNA relative to the parent compound based on lipophilicity and the occurrence of structural alerts, and applied two Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) tools to predict toxicity via receptor-mediated effects. In parallel, batch experiments were performed with three disinfectants, chlorine, chlorine dioxide and chloramine. After solid-phase extraction, the resulting TP mixtures were analyzed by chemical analysis and a battery of eleven in vitro bioassays covering a variety of endpoints. The laboratory results were in good agreement with the predictions. Overall, the combination of computational and experimental chemistry and toxicity methods used in this study suggest that disinfection of the studied EDCs and PPCPs will produce a large number of TPs, which are unlikely to increase specific toxicity (e.g., endocrine activity), but may result in increased reactive and non-specific toxicity.
药品和个人护理产品(PPCPs)和内分泌干扰化合物(EDCs)经常在饮用水源中被检测到。这引起了人们对饮用水消毒后可能形成更具毒性的转化产物(TPs)的担忧。本研究应用计算和实验相结合的方法,研究了八种在水源中经常检测到的 EDCs 和 PPCPs(对乙酰氨基酚、双酚 A、卡马西平、雌酮、17α-乙炔基雌二醇、吉非罗齐、萘普生和三氯生)在消毒前后的生物活性。使用逐步强制分子动力学(SFMD)方法,我们检测到了 911 种独特的 TPs,其中 36%是以前在科学文献中报道过的。我们根据亲脂性和结构警报的出现,计算了 TPs 相对于母体化合物引起生物分子或 DNA损伤的可能性,并应用了两种定量结构-活性关系(QSAR)工具来预测通过受体介导的效应产生的毒性。同时,我们用三种消毒剂(氯、二氧化氯和氯胺)进行了批量实验。经过固相萃取后,通过化学分析和十一项涵盖各种终点的体外生物测定电池对所得的 TP 混合物进行了分析。实验室结果与预测结果吻合良好。总的来说,本研究中应用的计算和实验化学及毒性方法的结合表明,所研究的 EDCs 和 PPCPs 的消毒将产生大量的 TPs,这些 TPs 不太可能增加特定的毒性(例如,内分泌活性),但可能导致反应性和非特异性毒性增加。