Assari Shervin, Khoshpouri Pegah, Chalian Hamid
Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Jan 24;7(1):17. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7010017.
To determine whether socioeconomic status (SES; educational attainment and income) explains the racial gap in cancer beliefs, cognitions, and emotions in a national sample of American adults.
For this cross-sectional study, data came from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2017, which included a nationally representative sample of American adults. The study enrolled 2277 adults who were either non-Hispanic Black ( = 409) or non-Hispanic White ( = 1868). Race, demographic factors (age and gender), SES (i.e., educational attainment and income), health access (insurance status, usual source of care), family history of cancer, fatalistic cancer beliefs, perceived risk of cancer, and cancer worries were measured. We ran structural equation models (SEMs) for data analysis.
Race and SES were associated with perceived risk of cancer, cancer worries, and fatalistic cancer beliefs, suggesting that non-Hispanic Blacks, low educational attainment and low income were associated with higher fatalistic cancer beliefs, lower perceived risk of cancer, and less cancer worries. Educational attainment and income only partially mediated the effects of race on cancer beliefs, emotions, and cognitions. Race was directly associated with fatalistic cancer beliefs, perceived risk of cancer, and cancer worries, net of SES.
Racial gap in SES is not the only reason behind racial gap in cancer beliefs, cognitions, and emotions. Racial gap in cancer related beliefs, emotions, and cognitions is the result of race and SES rather than race or SES. Elimination of racial gap in socioeconomic status will not be enough for elimination of racial disparities in cancer beliefs, cognitions, and emotions in the United States.
在美国成年人全国样本中,确定社会经济地位(SES;教育程度和收入)是否能解释癌症信念、认知和情绪方面的种族差异。
在这项横断面研究中,数据来自2017年健康信息全国趋势调查(HINTS),其中包括美国成年人的全国代表性样本。该研究纳入了2277名成年人,他们要么是非西班牙裔黑人(n = 409),要么是非西班牙裔白人(n = 1868)。测量了种族、人口统计学因素(年龄和性别)、SES(即教育程度和收入)、医疗保健可及性(保险状况、通常的医疗保健来源)、癌症家族史、宿命论癌症信念、感知到的癌症风险和癌症担忧。我们运行结构方程模型(SEM)进行数据分析。
种族和SES与感知到的癌症风险、癌症担忧和宿命论癌症信念相关,这表明非西班牙裔黑人、低教育程度和低收入与更高的宿命论癌症信念、更低的感知到的癌症风险和更少的癌症担忧相关。教育程度和收入仅部分介导了种族对癌症信念、情绪和认知的影响。在考虑SES的情况下,种族与宿命论癌症信念、感知到的癌症风险和癌症担忧直接相关。
SES方面的种族差异不是癌症信念、认知和情绪方面种族差异的唯一原因。癌症相关信念、情绪和认知方面的种族差异是种族和SES共同作用的结果,而非单独由种族或SES导致。消除社会经济地位方面的种族差异不足以消除美国在癌症信念、认知和情绪方面的种族差异。