• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于支持居家痴呆症患者的辅助技术的用户驱动型生活实验室:基于共同创造的创新开发协议。

User-Driven Living Lab for Assistive Technology to Support People With Dementia Living at Home: Protocol for Developing Co-Creation-Based Innovations.

作者信息

van den Kieboom Robin Cp, Bongers Inge Mb, Mark Ruth E, Snaphaan Liselore Jae

机构信息

Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

Research Unit Evidence Based Management of Innovation, Mental Health Care Institute Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jan 28;8(1):e10952. doi: 10.2196/10952.

DOI:10.2196/10952
PMID:30688653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6369423/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Owing to no cure for dementia currently, there is an urgent need to look for alternative ways to support these people and their informal caregivers. Carefully designed interventions can answer the unmet needs of both people with dementia and their informal caregivers in the community. However, existing products, systems, and services are often too complex or unsuitable.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify, longitudinally, the changing needs (as dementia progresses) of people with dementia living at home and their informal caregivers. By developing co-creation-based innovations, these changing needs will hopefully be met.

METHODS

A user-driven Living Lab design is used to structurally explore the needs over time of people with dementia (and their informal caregivers) living in the community in the North Brabant region of the Netherlands. In addition, co-creation-based innovations will be developed, tested, and evaluated by these people and their caregivers at home. All participants will complete complaints-oriented questionnaires at 3 time-points-at the baseline, 1 year, and 2 years after they start participating. Home interviews are scheduled to explore if and how these complaints translate into participants' specific needs or wishes. Focus groups meet on a monthly basis to further identify the needs of people with dementia and their informal caregivers and provide feedback to the stakeholders. In the context field, participants have an opportunity to actually test the products at home and provide feedback. Quantitative outcome measurements include neuropsychiatric symptoms, cognitive decline, independence in activities of daily living, safety, and caregiver burden. Qualitative outcome measurements include feedback to the stakeholders regarding the needs of people with dementia and their informal caregivers and how these needs change over time, as well as user experiences about the specific innovations.

RESULTS

Participant recruitment will start in September 2018 and is ongoing. The first results of data analyses are expected in the spring of 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall aim of Innovate Dementia 2.0 is to facilitate person-centered innovations developed for people with dementia and their informal caregivers at all stages as dementia progresses. This should lead to newly designed concepts and innovations, which are better able to answer the needs of people with dementia and their caregivers in the community.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/10952.

摘要

背景

由于目前尚无治愈痴呆症的方法,迫切需要寻找其他方式来支持这些患者及其非正式照护者。精心设计的干预措施可以满足痴呆症患者及其社区非正式照护者尚未得到满足的需求。然而,现有的产品、系统和服务往往过于复杂或不合适。

目的

本研究旨在纵向确定居家痴呆症患者及其非正式照护者不断变化的需求(随着痴呆症的进展)。通过开发基于共同创造的创新,有望满足这些不断变化的需求。

方法

采用用户驱动的生活实验室设计,以结构性地探索荷兰北布拉班特地区社区中痴呆症患者(及其非正式照护者)随时间变化的需求。此外,这些患者及其照护者将在家中对基于共同创造的创新进行开发、测试和评估。所有参与者将在开始参与后的3个时间点(基线、1年和2年)完成以抱怨为导向的问卷。安排进行家庭访谈,以探究这些抱怨是否以及如何转化为参与者的具体需求或愿望。焦点小组每月举行会议,以进一步确定痴呆症患者及其非正式照护者的需求,并向利益相关者提供反馈。在实际使用场景中,参与者有机会在家中实际测试产品并提供反馈。定量结果测量包括神经精神症状、认知衰退、日常生活活动的独立性、安全性和照护者负担。定性结果测量包括向利益相关者反馈痴呆症患者及其非正式照护者的需求以及这些需求如何随时间变化,以及关于具体创新的用户体验。

结果

参与者招募于2018年9月开始,目前仍在进行中。预计2019年春季得出数据分析的初步结果。

结论

“痴呆症创新2.0”的总体目标是促进在痴呆症进展的各个阶段为痴呆症患者及其非正式照护者开发以患者为中心的创新。这应会带来新设计的概念和创新,从而更好地满足社区中痴呆症患者及其照护者的需求。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/10952

相似文献

1
User-Driven Living Lab for Assistive Technology to Support People With Dementia Living at Home: Protocol for Developing Co-Creation-Based Innovations.用于支持居家痴呆症患者的辅助技术的用户驱动型生活实验室:基于共同创造的创新开发协议。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jan 28;8(1):e10952. doi: 10.2196/10952.
2
Development of a Caregivers' Support Platform (Connected Health Sustaining Home Stay in Dementia): Protocol for a Longitudinal Observational Mixed Methods Study.护理人员支持平台的开发(连接健康维持痴呆症患者居家护理):一项纵向观察性混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Aug 28;8(8):13280. doi: 10.2196/13280.
3
Requirements for Unobtrusive Monitoring to Support Home-Based Dementia Care: Qualitative Study Among Formal and Informal Caregivers.支持居家痴呆症护理的非侵入性监测要求:对正式和非正式护理人员的定性研究
JMIR Aging. 2021 Apr 12;4(2):e26875. doi: 10.2196/26875.
4
A Smart Health Platform for Measuring Health and Well-Being Improvement in People With Dementia and Their Informal Caregivers: Usability Study.用于衡量痴呆症患者及其非正式照料者健康状况改善情况的智能健康平台:可用性研究
JMIR Aging. 2020 Jul 23;3(2):e15600. doi: 10.2196/15600.
5
The TECH@HOME study, a technological intervention to reduce caregiver burden for informal caregivers of people with dementia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.TECH@HOME研究:一项减轻痴呆症患者非正式照料者负担的技术干预措施——一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Feb 9;18(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1796-8.
6
A Tablet App- and Sensor-Based Assistive Technology Intervention for Informal Caregivers to Manage the Challenging Behavior of People With Dementia (the insideDEM Study): Protocol for a Feasibility Study.一项针对非正式照料者管理痴呆症患者挑战行为的基于平板电脑应用程序和传感器的辅助技术干预措施(insideDEM研究):可行性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Feb 26;8(2):e11630. doi: 10.2196/11630.
7
Caring for a Person With Dementia on the Margins of Long-Term Care: A Perspective on Burden From 8 European Countries.长期护理边缘的痴呆症患者护理:来自 8 个欧洲国家的负担视角。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;18(11):967-973.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
8
Advance Care Planning Website for People With Dementia and Their Family Caregivers: Protocol for a Development and Usability Study.面向痴呆症患者及其家庭护理人员的预先护理计划网站:一项开发与可用性研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 26;12:e46935. doi: 10.2196/46935.
9
Differences in assistive technology installed for people with dementia living at home who have wandering and safety risks.居家痴呆症患者中,存在走失和安全风险的人群所使用的辅助技术的差异。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Oct 30;21(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02546-7.
10

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Neuropsychiatric Symptom Clusters in People with Dementia on Family Caregiver Burden.神经精神症状群对痴呆患者家庭成员负担的影响。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;100(4):1289-1298. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230972.
2
The multi-grip and standard myoelectric hand prosthesis compared: does the multi-grip hand live up to its promise?多抓握和标准肌电手假肢比较:多抓握手是否名副其实?
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Feb 15;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01131-w.
3
Rehabilitation Supported by Technology: Protocol for an International Cocreation and User Experience Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Activities of daily living and quality of life across different stages of dementia: a UK study.痴呆症不同阶段的日常生活活动与生活质量:一项英国研究。
Aging Ment Health. 2015 Jan;19(1):63-71. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.915920. Epub 2014 May 15.
2
Unmet needs of community-residing persons with dementia and their informal caregivers: findings from the maximizing independence at home study.社区居住的痴呆症患者及其非正规照护者的未满足需求:来自最大限度地居家独立研究的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Dec;61(12):2087-2095. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12549.
3
Involving people with dementia in the development of supportive IT applications: a systematic review.
技术支持的康复:一项国际共创与用户体验研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Mar 10;11(3):e34537. doi: 10.2196/34537.
4
Building a Research Roadmap for Caregiver Innovation: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Consultation and Evaluation.构建 caregiver 创新研究路线图:多利益相关者协商和评估的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 23;18(23):12291. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312291.
5
Wearable Assistive Robotics: A Perspective on Current Challenges and Future Trends.可穿戴辅助机器人:当前挑战与未来趋势透视。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 12;21(20):6751. doi: 10.3390/s21206751.
6
Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT.评估是关键:为医疗信息技术的参与式和以用户为中心的设计过程提供适当的评估措施。
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Jun 21;21(2):24. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5529.
让痴呆症患者参与支持性信息技术应用的开发:系统评价。
Ageing Res Rev. 2013 Mar;12(2):535-51. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
4
A comparative review of the Katz ADL and the Barthel Index in assessing the activities of daily living of older people.对 Katz ADL 和 Barthel 指数在评估老年人日常生活活动方面的比较评价。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2007 Sep;2(3):204-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2007.00074.x.
5
Keeping In Touch Everyday (KITE) project: developing assistive technologies with people with dementia and their carers to promote independence.每日保持联系(KITE)项目:与痴呆症患者及其护理人员共同开发辅助技术以促进独立生活。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2009 Jun;21(3):494-502. doi: 10.1017/S1041610209008448. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
6
Intelligent assistive technology applications to dementia care: current capabilities, limitations, and future challenges.智能辅助技术在痴呆症护理中的应用:当前能力、局限性及未来挑战。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;17(2):88-104. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318187dde5.
7
Are all caregivers created equal? Stress in caregivers to adults with and without dementia.所有照顾者都一样吗?照顾患有和未患痴呆症的成年人时照顾者的压力。
J Aging Health. 2006 Aug;18(4):534-51. doi: 10.1177/0898264306289620.
8
Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory.神经精神科问卷简版临床表型NPI-Q的验证
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000 Spring;12(2):233-9. doi: 10.1176/jnp.12.2.233.
9
[Abbreviated form of the Informant Questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly].[老年人认知功能减退 informant 问卷简表]
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1997 Oct;28(5):224-9.
10
Clinical dementia rating: a reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the Alzheimer type.临床痴呆评定量表:一种用于阿尔茨海默型痴呆的可靠且有效的诊断及分期测量工具。
Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9 Suppl 1:173-6; discussion 177-8. doi: 10.1017/s1041610297004870.