• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典新药监测框架。

A framework for monitoring of new drugs in Sweden.

机构信息

a Department of Medical Sciences , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.

b Uppsala Clinical Research Center Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.

出版信息

Ups J Med Sci. 2019 Jan;124(1):46-50. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2018.1550454. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1080/03009734.2018.1550454
PMID:30689485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6450577/
Abstract

In order to monitor the net public health benefit of new drugs, especially in the light of recent stepwise approval approaches, there is a need to optimize real-time post-marketing evaluation of new drugs using data collected in routine care. Sweden, with its unique possibilities for observational research, can provide these data. We herein propose a framework for continuous monitoring of the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of new drugs, using prospectively determined protocols designed in collaboration between all relevant stakeholders. We believe that this framework can be a useful tool for healthcare authorities and reimbursement agencies in the introduction of new drugs.

摘要

为了监测新药的净公共卫生效益,特别是鉴于最近逐步批准的方法,需要利用常规护理中收集的数据来优化新药的实时上市后评估。瑞典拥有独特的观察性研究可能性,可以提供这些数据。我们在此提出了一个使用所有相关利益相关者合作制定的前瞻性协议来持续监测新药的有效性、安全性和成本效益的框架。我们相信,这个框架可以成为医疗保健当局和报销机构在引入新药方面的有用工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aae/6450577/f75020ea2eec/IUPS_A_1550454_F0004_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aae/6450577/a3c74192458d/IUPS_A_1550454_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aae/6450577/4207dc79d26f/IUPS_A_1550454_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aae/6450577/ce2eca506911/IUPS_A_1550454_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aae/6450577/f75020ea2eec/IUPS_A_1550454_F0004_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aae/6450577/a3c74192458d/IUPS_A_1550454_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aae/6450577/4207dc79d26f/IUPS_A_1550454_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aae/6450577/ce2eca506911/IUPS_A_1550454_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aae/6450577/f75020ea2eec/IUPS_A_1550454_F0004_B.jpg

相似文献

1
A framework for monitoring of new drugs in Sweden.瑞典新药监测框架。
Ups J Med Sci. 2019 Jan;124(1):46-50. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2018.1550454. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
2
Drug policy: making effective drugs available without bankrupting the healthcare system.药品政策:提供有效的药品,同时避免医疗保健系统破产。
Healthc Pap. 2002;3(1):12-30. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2002.16906.
3
[Sweden can contribute to safer drug assessment].瑞典可为更安全的药物评估做出贡献。
Lakartidningen. 2006;103(23):1853-5.
4
The Comparative Effectiveness of Innovative Treatments for Cancer (CEIT-Cancer) project: Rationale and design of the database and the collection of evidence available at approval of novel drugs.癌症创新治疗的比较效果(CEIT-Cancer)项目:数据库的基本原理与设计以及新药获批时可用证据的收集
Trials. 2018 Sep 19;19(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2877-z.
5
Impact of Postapproval Evidence Generation on the Biopharmaceutical Industry.批准后证据生成对生物制药行业的影响。
Clin Ther. 2015 Aug;37(8):1852-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.05.514. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
Assessing the comparative effectiveness of newly marketed medications: methodological challenges and implications for drug development.评估新上市药物的比较疗效:方法学挑战及对药物开发的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Dec;90(6):777-90. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.235. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
7
Comparative effectiveness research for the clinician researcher: a framework for making a methodological design choice.临床研究人员的比较效果研究:一种进行方法学设计选择的框架。
Trials. 2016 Aug 17;17(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1535-6.
8
Effectiveness of Drugs in Routine Care: A Model for Sequential Monitoring of New Medicines Using Dronedarone as Example.常规护理中的药物效果:以多非利特为例的新药序贯监测模型。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Mar;103(3):493-501. doi: 10.1002/cpt.751. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
9
Comparative effectiveness research in cancer with observational data.利用观察性数据开展癌症比较疗效研究。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015:e330-5. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2015.35.e330.
10
Prevalent new-user cohort designs for comparative drug effect studies by time-conditional propensity scores.通过时间条件倾向评分进行比较药物效应研究的流行新用户队列设计。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Apr;26(4):459-468. doi: 10.1002/pds.4107. Epub 2016 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Drugs in Routine Care: A Model for Sequential Monitoring of New Medicines Using Dronedarone as Example.常规护理中的药物效果:以多非利特为例的新药序贯监测模型。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Mar;103(3):493-501. doi: 10.1002/cpt.751. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
2
Real-World Evidence - What Is It and What Can It Tell Us?真实世界证据——它是什么以及能告诉我们什么?
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2293-2297. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1609216.
3
Using Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available.在没有随机试验时使用大数据模拟目标试验。
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr 15;183(8):758-64. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv254. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
4
From adaptive licensing to adaptive pathways: delivering a flexible life-span approach to bring new drugs to patients.从适应性许可到适应性途径:采用灵活的全生命周期方法将新药带给患者。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Mar;97(3):234-46. doi: 10.1002/cpt.59. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
5
The public-private pendulum--patient choice and equity in Sweden.公私之间的摇摆——瑞典的患者选择与公平性
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1;372(1):1-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1411430.
6
Sources of European drug consumption data at a country level.国家层面欧洲药物消费数据的来源。
Int J Public Health. 2014 Oct;59(5):877-87. doi: 10.1007/s00038-014-0564-8. Epub 2014 May 30.
7
Propensity scores for confounder adjustment when assessing the effects of medical interventions using nonexperimental study designs.使用非实验性研究设计评估医学干预措施效果时,用于混杂因素调整的倾向评分。
J Intern Med. 2014 Jun;275(6):570-80. doi: 10.1111/joim.12197. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
8
A MiniReview of the use of hospital-based databases in observational inpatient studies of drugs.药物观察性住院研究中基于医院数据库的使用小型综述。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2013 Jan;112(1):13-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2012.00928.x. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
9
Assessing the comparative effectiveness of newly marketed medications: methodological challenges and implications for drug development.评估新上市药物的比较疗效:方法学挑战及对药物开发的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Dec;90(6):777-90. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.235. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
10
DAGitty: a graphical tool for analyzing causal diagrams.DAGitty:一种用于分析因果图的图形工具。
Epidemiology. 2011 Sep;22(5):745. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318225c2be.