AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Parasitologie Mycologie, F-75013 Paris, France.
Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, CIMI-Paris, F-75013 Paris, France.
Med Mycol. 2019 Nov 1;57(8):962-968. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myz004.
The taxonomy of Aspergillus species has recently been revolutionized with the introduction of cryptic species and section concepts. However, their species-level identification in routine laboratories remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the identification accuracy of cryptic species of Aspergillus in various laboratories using the mass spectrometry identification (MSI) platform, an independent and freely accessible online mass spectrometry database. Over a 12-month period, when a select set of MSI users identified cryptic species, they were contacted and requested to send the isolates to our laboratory for sequence-based identification. Sequence and MSI identification results were then compared. During the study period, 5108 Aspergillus isolates were identified using MSI including 1477 (28.9%) cryptic species. A total of 245 isolates that corresponded to 56 cryptic species and 13 sections were randomly selected for DNA sequencing confirmation. Agreement between the two methods was 99.6% at the section level and 66.1% at the species level. However, almost all discrepancies (72/83, 86.7%) were misidentifications between closely related cryptic species belonging to the same section. Fifty-one isolates from noncryptic species were also identified, thus yielding 100% and 92.2% agreement at the section and species level, respectively. Although the MSI fungus database is a reliable tool to identify Aspergillus at the section level, the database still requires adjustment to correctly identify rare or cryptic species at the species level. Nevertheless, the application properly differentiated between cryptic and sensu stricto species in the same section, thus alerting on possible specific isolate characteristics.
曲霉属种的分类学最近因隐种和组概念的引入而发生了革命性变化。然而,在常规实验室中对其种水平的鉴定仍然是一个挑战。本研究的目的是前瞻性地评估使用质谱鉴定(MSI)平台(一个独立且免费的在线质谱数据库)在各个实验室中鉴定曲霉属隐种的准确性。在 12 个月的时间里,当一组选定的 MSI 用户鉴定出隐种时,他们会被联系并要求将分离物送到我们的实验室进行基于序列的鉴定。然后比较序列和 MSI 鉴定结果。在研究期间,使用 MSI 鉴定了 5108 株曲霉属,包括 1477 株(28.9%)隐种。随机选择了 245 株与 56 种隐种和 13 个组相对应的分离物进行 DNA 测序确认。两种方法在组水平上的一致性为 99.6%,在种水平上的一致性为 66.1%。然而,几乎所有的差异(72/83,86.7%)都是属于同一组的密切相关的隐种之间的错误鉴定。也鉴定了来自非隐种的 51 株分离物,因此在组和种水平上的一致性分别为 100%和 92.2%。虽然 MSI 真菌数据库是一种可靠的工具,可以在组水平上鉴定曲霉属,但该数据库仍需要调整,以正确鉴定种水平上的稀有或隐种。尽管如此,该应用程序在同一组中正确地区分了隐种和严格意义上的种,从而提醒注意可能的特定分离物特征。