• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of Outcomes in Level I vs Level II Trauma Centers in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy or Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.颅脑创伤患者行开颅术或去骨瓣减压术于 I 级与 II 级创伤中心治疗结局的比较。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan 1;86(1):107-111. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy634.
2
Comparison of Outcomes of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in 36,929 Patients Treated with or without Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in a Mature Trauma System.在一个成熟的创伤系统中,对36929例接受或未接受颅内压监测治疗的重度创伤性脑损伤患者的预后比较。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Apr;136:e535-e541. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.070. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
3
Effect of Hypernatremia on Outcomes After severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis.高钠血症对重度创伤性脑损伤后结局的影响:一项全国住院患者样本分析。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Oct;118:e880-e886. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.089. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
4
Neuro, trauma, or med/surg intensive care unit: Does it matter where multiple injuries patients with traumatic brain injury are admitted? Secondary analysis of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trials Committee decompressive craniectomy study.神经、创伤或内科/外科重症监护病房:创伤性脑损伤的多发伤患者被收治于何处是否重要?美国创伤外科协会多机构试验委员会减压性颅骨切除术研究的二次分析
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Mar;82(3):489-496. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001361.
5
An analysis of neurosurgical practice patterns and outcomes for serious to critical traumatic brain injuries in a mature trauma state.对一个成熟创伤地区严重至危急创伤性脑损伤的神经外科手术实践模式及结果的分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 May;80(5):755-61; discussion 761-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000997.
6
Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale score and pupil parameters on mortality rate and outcome in pediatric and adult severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study.格拉斯哥昏迷评分和瞳孔参数对儿童和成人严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率和预后的影响:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):760-767. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152385. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
7
Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy only for intracranial hemorrhage evacuation: A propensity matched study.单纯开颅清除颅内血肿与去骨瓣减压术:一项倾向匹配研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Dec;83(6):1148-1153. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001658.
8
The effect of age on functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: 6-month report of a prospective multicenter trial.年龄对轻度创伤性脑损伤功能结局的影响:一项前瞻性多中心试验的6个月报告。
J Trauma. 2004 May;56(5):1042-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000127767.83267.33.
9
Hospital volume-outcome relationship in severe traumatic brain injury: stratified analysis by level of trauma center.严重创伤性脑损伤的医院量效关系:创伤中心水平分层分析。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Mar 13;134(3):1303-1315. doi: 10.3171/2020.1.JNS192115. Print 2021 Mar 1.
10
Patients with severe traumatic brain injury transferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009.2007 年至 2009 年期间,严重创伤性脑损伤患者转送至一级或二级创伤中心:美国。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1491-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782675.

引用本文的文献

1
Letter to the editor "effect of continuous hypertonic saline infusion on clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury".致编辑的信:“持续输注高渗盐水对创伤性脑损伤患者临床结局的影响”
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Feb 28;47(1):96. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02331-1.
2
Telemedicine in Neurosurgical Trauma during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Center Experience.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间神经外科创伤的远程医疗:单中心经验
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;12(9):2061. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12092061.
3
Investigation of the Effects of Large Bone Flap Craniotomy on Cerebral Hemodynamics, Intracranial Infection Rate, and Nerve Function in Patients with Severe Craniocerebral Trauma.探讨大骨瓣开颅术对重型颅脑创伤患者脑血流动力学、颅内感染率及神经功能的影响。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Sep 2;2022:2681278. doi: 10.1155/2022/2681278. eCollection 2022.
4
A Retrospective Analysis of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Outcomes in Adults after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury at Kaiser Permanente Trauma Centers.凯萨医疗机构严重创伤性脑损伤成人患者颅内压监测与预后的回顾性分析。
Perm J. 2021 May 19;25:20.293. doi: 10.7812/TPP/20.293.
5
Hospitals with and without neurosurgery: a comparative study evaluating the outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury.有神经外科和无神经外科的医院:一项评估创伤性脑损伤患者结局的对比研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Nov 2;29(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00959-2.
6
Identifying trauma patients with benefit from direct transportation to Level-1 trauma centers.识别有获益于直接转运至 1 级创伤中心的创伤患者。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 6;21(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00487-3.
7
A Re-Evaluation of the Effect of Trauma Center Verification Level on the Early Risk of Death in Hemodynamically Unstable Patients.创伤中心认证级别对血流动力学不稳定患者早期死亡风险影响的重新评估
Cureus. 2021 Apr 13;13(4):e14462. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14462.

本文引用的文献

1
Adherence to Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines for Management of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients and Its Effect on Outcomes: Systematic Review.颅脑创伤患者管理指南的依从性及其对结局的影响:系统评价。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Jul 1;35(13):1407-1418. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5345. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
2
Understanding Hospital Volume-Outcome Relationship in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.了解严重创伤性脑损伤中医院治疗量与治疗结果的关系。
Neurosurgery. 2017 Apr 1;80(4):534-542. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw098.
3
Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition.《重型颅脑损伤管理指南(第四版)》
Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):6-15. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432.
4
Determining the hospital trauma financial impact in a statewide trauma system.确定全州创伤系统中医院创伤的财务影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;220(4):446-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.039. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
5
In a mature trauma system, there is no difference in outcome (survival) between Level I and Level II trauma centers.在一个成熟的创伤救治体系中,一级创伤中心和二级创伤中心在治疗结果(生存率)上没有差异。
J Trauma. 2011 Jun;70(6):1354-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182183789.
6
Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury.去骨瓣减压术在弥漫性创伤性脑损伤中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 21;364(16):1493-502. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102077. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
7
Traumatic brain injury in the United States: an epidemiologic overview.美国的创伤性脑损伤:流行病学概述
Mt Sinai J Med. 2009 Apr;76(2):105-10. doi: 10.1002/msj.20100.
8
Effect of trauma center designation on outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.创伤中心指定对重度创伤性脑损伤患者预后的影响。
Arch Surg. 2008 Dec;143(12):1213-7; discussion 1217. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.12.1213.
9
Epidemiology and 12-month outcomes from traumatic brain injury in australia and new zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰创伤性脑损伤的流行病学及12个月预后情况。
J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):854-62. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180340e77.
10
Marked improvement in adherence to traumatic brain injury guidelines in United States trauma centers.美国创伤中心对创伤性脑损伤指南的遵循情况有显著改善。
J Trauma. 2007 Oct;63(4):841-7; discussion 847-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318123fc21.

颅脑创伤患者行开颅术或去骨瓣减压术于 I 级与 II 级创伤中心治疗结局的比较。

Comparison of Outcomes in Level I vs Level II Trauma Centers in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy or Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Department of Neurosurgery & Radiology, Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami University Hospital, Miami, Florida.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan 1;86(1):107-111. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy634.

DOI:10.1093/neuros/nyy634
PMID:30690608
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6911730/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) carries a devastatingly high rate of morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether patients undergoing craniotomy/craniectomy for severe TBI fare better at level I than level II trauma centers in a mature trauma system.

METHODS

The data were extracted from the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study database. Inclusion criteria were patients > 18 yr with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score less than 9) undergoing craniotomy or craniectomy in the state of Pennsylvania from January 1, 2002 through September 30, 2017.

RESULTS

Of 3980 patients, 2568 (64.5%) were treated at level I trauma centers and 1412 (35.5%) at level II centers. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups except for significantly worse GCS scores at admission in level I centers (P = .002). The rate of in-hospital mortality was 37.6% in level I centers vs 40.4% in level II centers (P = .08). Mean Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores at discharge were significantly higher in level I (10.9 ± 5.5) than level II centers (9.8 ± 5.3; P < .005). In multivariate analysis, treatment at level II trauma centers was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.37; P = .01) and worse FIM scores (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.7; P = .001). Mean hospital and ICU length of stay were significantly longer in level I centers (P < .005).

CONCLUSION

This study showed superior functional outcomes and lower mortality rates in patients undergoing a neurosurgical procedure for severe TBI in level I trauma centers.

摘要

背景

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的发病率和死亡率极高。

目的

在成熟的创伤系统中,评估接受开颅/去骨瓣减压术治疗严重 TBI 的患者在一级创伤中心是否比二级创伤中心预后更好。

方法

数据从宾夕法尼亚创伤结局研究数据库中提取。纳入标准为 18 岁以上 GCS 评分<9 分的严重 TBI 患者,于 2002 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 9 月 30 日期间在宾夕法尼亚州接受开颅或去骨瓣减压术。

结果

在 3980 例患者中,2568 例(64.5%)在一级创伤中心治疗,1412 例(35.5%)在二级创伤中心治疗。两组患者的基线特征相似,但一级中心入院时 GCS 评分明显更差(P=0.002)。一级中心的院内死亡率为 37.6%,二级中心为 40.4%(P=0.08)。一级中心出院时的平均功能独立性测量(FIM)评分明显更高(10.9±5.5),二级中心为 9.8±5.3(P<0.005)。多变量分析显示,在二级创伤中心治疗与院内死亡率显著相关(比值比,1.2;95%置信区间,1.03-1.37;P=0.01),与较差的 FIM 评分也显著相关(比值比,1.4;95%置信区间,1.1-1.7;P=0.001)。一级中心的平均住院时间和 ICU 住院时间明显更长(P<0.005)。

结论

本研究表明,在一级创伤中心接受神经外科手术治疗严重 TBI 的患者,其功能结局更好,死亡率更低。