Suppr超能文献

多皮质区划分方案的厚度、体积和表面积的对照研究

A controlled comparison of thickness, volume and surface areas from multiple cortical parcellation packages.

机构信息

University of Edinburgh, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (CCBS), The Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.

出版信息

BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Jan 28;20(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-2609-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cortical parcellation is an essential neuroimaging tool for identifying and characterizing morphometric and connectivity brain changes occurring with age and disease. A variety of software packages have been developed for parcellating the brain's cortical surface into a variable number of regions but interpackage differences can undermine reproducibility. Using a ground truth dataset (Edinburgh_NIH10), we investigated such differences for grey matter thickness (GM), grey matter volume (GM) and white matter surface area (WM) for the superior frontal gyrus (SFG), supramarginal gyrus (SMG), and cingulate gyrus (CG) from 4 parcellation protocols as implemented in the FreeSurfer, BrainSuite, and BrainGyrusMapping (BGM) software packages.

RESULTS

Corresponding gyral definitions and morphometry approaches were not identical across the packages. As expected, there were differences in the bordering landmarks of each gyrus as well as in the manner in which variability was addressed. Rostral and caudal SFG and SMG boundaries differed, and in the event of a double CG occurrence, its upper fold was not always addressed. This led to a knock-on effect that was visible at the neighbouring gyri (e.g., knock-on effect at the SFG following CG definition) as well as gyral morphometric measurements of the affected gyri. Statistical analysis showed that the most consistent approaches were FreeSurfer's Desikan-Killiany-Tourville (DKT) protocol for GM and BrainGyrusMapping for GM. Package consistency varied for WM, depending on the region of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the significance and implications that a parcellation protocol will have on the classification, and sometimes treatment, of subjects, it is essential to select the protocol which accurately represents their regions of interest and corresponding morphometrics, while embracing cortical variability.

摘要

背景

皮质分割是一种重要的神经影像学工具,可用于识别和描述与年龄和疾病相关的形态和连接脑变化。已经开发了各种软件包来将大脑皮质表面分割成可变数量的区域,但软件包之间的差异可能会影响可重复性。我们使用地面真实数据集(爱丁堡 NIH10),研究了 4 种分割方案(FreeSurfer、BrainSuite 和 BrainGyrusMapping(BGM)软件包中的 Edinburgh_NIH10)中 4 种分割方案中额上回(SFG)、缘上回(SMG)和扣带回(CG)的灰质厚度(GM)、灰质体积(GM)和白质表面积(WM)的差异。

结果

不同软件包中的回定义和形态测量方法并不完全相同。正如预期的那样,每个回的边界标志以及处理变异性的方式都存在差异。SFG 和 SMG 的额侧和尾侧边界不同,而且在发生双 CG 时,其上部褶皱并不总是被处理。这导致了相邻回(例如,在 CG 定义后 SFG 的连锁效应)以及受影响回的回形态测量的连锁效应。统计分析表明,GM 最一致的方法是 FreeSurfer 的 Desikan-Killiany-Tourville(DKT)协议和 GM 的 BrainGyrusMapping。WM 的包一致性取决于感兴趣的区域。

结论

鉴于分割方案对分类的重要性和影响,以及对受试者的治疗有时具有重要意义,因此必须选择能够准确代表其感兴趣区域及其相应形态的方案,同时还需要考虑皮质的变异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77d4/6348615/d3da7511b112/12859_2019_2609_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验