Cai Kunpeng, Xu Hong, Guan Hao, Zhu Wanlin, Jiang Jiyang, Cui Yue, Zhang Jicong, Liu Tao, Wen Wei
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
International Research Institute for Multidisciplinary Science, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 27;12(1):e0170875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170875. eCollection 2017.
Identifying Alzheimer's disease (AD) at its early stage is of major interest in AD research. Previous studies have suggested that abnormalities in regional sulcal width and global sulcal index (g-SI) are characteristics of patients with early-stage AD. In this study, we investigated sulcal width and three other common neuroimaging morphological measures (cortical thickness, cortical volume, and subcortical volume) to identify early-stage AD. These measures were evaluated in 150 participants, including 75 normal controls (NC) and 75 patients with early-stage AD. The global sulcal index (g-SI) and the width of five individual sulci (the superior frontal, intra-parietal, superior temporal, central, and Sylvian fissure) were extracted from 3D T1-weighted images. The discriminative performances of the other three traditional neuroimaging morphological measures were also examined. Information Gain (IG) was used to select a subset of features to provide significant information for separating NC and early-stage AD subjects. Based on the four modalities of the individual measures, i.e., sulcal measures, cortical thickness, cortical volume, subcortical volume, and combinations of these individual measures, three types of classifiers (Naïve Bayes, Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine) were applied to compare the classification performances. We observed that sulcal measures were either superior than or equal to the other measures used for classification. Specifically, the g-SI and the width of the Sylvian fissure were two of the most sensitive sulcal measures and could be useful neuroanatomical markers for detecting early-stage AD. There were no significant differences between the three classifiers that we tested when using the same neuroanatomical features.
在阿尔茨海默病(AD)研究中,早期识别AD至关重要。先前的研究表明,区域脑沟宽度和全局脑沟指数(g-SI)异常是早期AD患者的特征。在本研究中,我们调查了脑沟宽度以及其他三种常见的神经影像形态学测量指标(皮质厚度、皮质体积和皮质下体积),以识别早期AD。对150名参与者进行了这些测量评估,其中包括75名正常对照(NC)和75名早期AD患者。从3D T1加权图像中提取全局脑沟指数(g-SI)和五个单独脑沟(额上沟、顶内沟、颞上沟、中央沟和外侧裂)的宽度。还检查了其他三种传统神经影像形态学测量指标的判别性能。使用信息增益(IG)来选择一组特征,以提供区分NC和早期AD受试者的重要信息。基于个体测量指标的四种模式,即脑沟测量、皮质厚度、皮质体积、皮质下体积以及这些个体测量指标的组合,应用三种类型的分类器(朴素贝叶斯、逻辑回归和支持向量机)来比较分类性能。我们观察到,脑沟测量指标在分类方面要么优于要么等同于其他测量指标。具体而言,g-SI和外侧裂宽度是最敏感的两个脑沟测量指标,可能是检测早期AD有用的神经解剖学标志物。当使用相同的神经解剖学特征时,我们测试的三种分类器之间没有显著差异。