Lebedeva Nadezdha, Schwartz Shalom H, Van De Vijver Fons J R, Plucker Jonathan, Bushina Ekaterina
Department of Psychology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.
Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 14;9:2681. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02681. eCollection 2018.
We examined the applicability of the hybrid model of creativity, which specifies distinct domains that all express an underlying general creativity factor, in data from representative samples from Central Russia and the North Caucasus ( = 2,046). Using multigroup confirmatory analysis, Study 1 supported the invariance of a model with the six unifactorial domains (i.e., crafts, visual arts, performance, theater, products for work, and machine graphics) at the first level and a general creativity factor at the second level. Study 2 examined socio-demographic characteristics and 19 basic values that might be associated with creative activity. The more modern Central Russian region scored higher on global creativity and on all 6 domains. Of the 4 higher order values in the Schwartz model, Openness to Change values correlated positively and Conservation values correlated negatively with global creativity and with creativity in most domains. Variation across domains in the specific values that predicted creativity revealed that creativity in each domain had some unique motivators. We draw on culture and social structure to explain differences between regions in the value motivators of creativity.
我们检验了创造力混合模型的适用性,该模型明确了不同领域,所有领域都表达了一个潜在的一般创造力因素,我们使用的是来自俄罗斯中部和北高加索地区代表性样本(N = 2046)的数据。研究1通过多组验证性分析,支持了一个模型的不变性,该模型在第一层次有六个单因素领域(即手工艺、视觉艺术、表演、戏剧、工作用品和机械制图),在第二层次有一个一般创造力因素。研究2考察了可能与创造性活动相关的社会人口特征和19种基本价值观。更具现代性的俄罗斯中部地区在整体创造力和所有6个领域的得分更高。在施瓦茨模型的4个高阶价值观中,“开放变革”价值观与整体创造力呈正相关,“保守”价值观与整体创造力以及大多数领域的创造力呈负相关。预测创造力的特定价值观在各领域的差异表明,每个领域的创造力都有一些独特的激励因素。我们借助文化和社会结构来解释不同地区在创造力价值激励因素方面的差异。