Tang Min, Hofreiter Sebastian, Reiter-Palmon Roni, Bai Xinwen, Murugavel Vignesh
Institute for Creativity and Innovation, University of Applied Management, Ismaning, Germany.
Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE, United States.
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 9;12:601389. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601389. eCollection 2021.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has brought about unprecedented uncertainty and challenges to the worldwide economy and people's everyday life. Anecdotal and scientific evidence has documented the existence of a positive relationship between the experience of crisis and creativity. Though this appears to be ubiquitous, the crisis-creativity-well-being relationship has not been sufficiently examined across countries and using a working adult sample. The current study drew on a sample consisting of 1,420 employees from China ( = 489, 40% females), Germany ( = 599, 47% females), and the United States ( = 332, 43% females) to examine whether creativity can function as an effective means to cope with crisis and to achieve both flourishing and social well-being. Multivariate analyses showed that perceived impact of COVID-19 was positively related to creative process engagement, which was positively related to employees' self-reported creative growth. Creative growth was associated with a higher level of flourishing well-being. This sequential mediation model was significant across the three samples. Creativity also mediated the relationship between perceived impact of COVID-19 and social well-being (social connectedness), but this connection was only found for the Chinese sample. Further data analyses revealed that individualism moderated this serial mediation model in that the positive coping effect of creativity on both flourishing and social well-being was stronger for individuals who hold more collectivistic views. Results of the study have implications for crisis management, personal development, and positive functioning of individuals and society.
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行给全球经济和人们的日常生活带来了前所未有的不确定性和挑战。轶事证据和科学证据都证明,危机经历与创造力之间存在正相关关系。尽管这种关系似乎普遍存在,但尚未在不同国家以及使用在职成年人样本充分研究危机、创造力与幸福感之间的关系。本研究以来自中国(n = 489,40%为女性)、德国(n = 599,47%为女性)和美国(n = 332,43%为女性)的1420名员工为样本,研究创造力是否可以作为应对危机以及实现蓬勃发展和社会幸福感的有效手段。多变量分析表明,COVID-19的感知影响与创造性过程参与呈正相关,而创造性过程参与与员工自我报告中的创造性成长呈正相关。创造性成长与更高水平的蓬勃幸福感相关。这种序列中介模型在三个样本中均显著。创造力还介导了COVID-19的感知影响与社会幸福感(社会联结)之间的关系,但这种联系仅在中国样本中发现。进一步的数据分析表明,个人主义调节了这种序列中介模型,即对于持有更多集体主义观点的个体,创造力对蓬勃发展和社会幸福感的积极应对效应更强。研究结果对危机管理、个人发展以及个人和社会的积极功能具有启示意义。