Suppr超能文献

慢性疼痛诊所人群中常见疼痛测量的规范数据:为临床医生和研究人员填补空白。

Normative data for common pain measures in chronic pain clinic populations: closing a gap for clinicians and researchers.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health, Pain Management Research Institute, University of Sydney and Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Pain. 2019 May;160(5):1156-1165. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001496.

Abstract

Normative data for chronic pain questionnaires are essential to the interpretation of aggregate scores on these questionnaires, for both clinical trials and clinical practice. In this study, we summarised data from 13,343 heterogeneous patients on several commonly used pain questionnaires that were routinely collected from 36 pain clinics in Australia and New Zealand as part of the electronic Persistent Pain Outcomes Collaboration (ePPOC) including the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI); the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS); the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ); and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). The data are presented as summarised normative data, broken down by demographic (age, sex, work status, etc) and pain site/medical variables. The mean BPI severity score was 6.4 (moderate-severe), and mean interference score was 7.0. The mean DASS depression score was 20.2 (moderate-severe), mean DASS anxiety was 14.0 (moderate), and mean DASS stress was 21.0 (moderate). The mean PCS scores were 10.0, 5.9, 14.1, and 29.8 for rumination, magnification, helplessness, and total, respectively. The mean PSEQ score was 20.7. Men had slightly worse scores than women on some scales. Scores tended to worsen with age until 31 to 50 years, after which they improved. Scores were worse for those who had a greater number of pain sites, were unemployed, were injury compensation cases, or whose triggering event was a motor vehicle accident or injury at work or home. These results and comparisons with data on the same measures from other countries, as well as their uses in both clinical practice and clinical trials, are discussed.

摘要

慢性疼痛问卷的常模数据对于这些问卷的总分解释至关重要,无论是在临床试验还是临床实践中都是如此。在这项研究中,我们总结了来自澳大利亚和新西兰 36 家疼痛诊所的 13343 名异质患者的多项常用疼痛问卷的数据,这些数据是作为电子持续性疼痛结果协作(ePPOC)的一部分常规收集的,包括简明疼痛量表(BPI);抑郁焦虑和压力量表(DASS);疼痛自我效能问卷(PSEQ);和疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)。数据以按人口统计学(年龄、性别、工作状态等)和疼痛部位/医学变量细分的总结常模数据呈现。BPI 严重程度评分的平均值为 6.4(中重度),干扰评分的平均值为 7.0。DASS 抑郁评分的平均值为 20.2(中重度),DASS 焦虑评分的平均值为 14.0(中度),DASS 压力评分的平均值为 21.0(中度)。PCS 评分的平均值分别为 10.0、5.9、14.1 和 29.8,用于沉思、放大、无助和总分。PSEQ 评分的平均值为 20.7。在一些量表上,男性的评分略差于女性。评分随年龄的增长而恶化,直到 31 至 50 岁,之后有所改善。那些疼痛部位较多、失业、工伤赔偿案件、触发事件是机动车事故或工作或家庭受伤的患者评分较差。这些结果以及与其他国家相同指标数据的比较,以及它们在临床实践和临床试验中的应用,都进行了讨论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验