• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专业精神评估:从何而来——走向何方?渥太华专业精神评估共识小组的最新进展。

Assessment of professionalism: From where have we come - to where are we going? An update from the Ottawa Consensus Group on the assessment of professionalism.

机构信息

a Wilson Centre for Research in Medical Education , University Health Network and Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada.

b Institute of Health Policy , Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2019 Mar;41(3):249-255. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1543862. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2018.1543862
PMID:30696355
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2009, an International Working Group (IWG) on the Assessment of Professionalism began collaborating and published recommendations in 2011. Nearly a decade later the IWG reconvened to take stock of the state of practice and research in professionalism and the impact of the 2011 report.

METHOD

A bibliometric study identified all publications on assessment of professionalism since 2011, noting those that cited the original report. Articles were coded to identify the reason for citation and new trends in assessment. Bibliometric data were supplemented by discussion groups held at key international education meetings.

RESULTS

Six-hundred publications on the assessment of professionalism were found in Google Scholar and 164 in Web of Science since 2011, of which 177 (30%) and 84 (50%) respectively cited the original IWG publication. English language publications were most common (83%), but there were articles in 13 other languages by authors from 40 countries. The report was cited commonly to justify attention to professionalism in general (41%), assessment of professionalism (38%) and to explore professionalism in different countries and professions (25%). A thematic analysis showed that of 9 research areas recommended in 2011, 7 of 9 categories were represented with a large increase in research across languages and cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

Though the assessment of professionalism remains a challenge the research base continues to grow, especially related to professionalism across cultures and languages, and a large percentage of publications cite the IWG recommendations. There remains a gap in research and writing about patients' perspectives.

摘要

背景

2009 年,国际专业评估工作组(IWG)开始合作,并于 2011 年发布了建议。近十年后,IWG 重新评估了专业精神实践和研究的现状以及 2011 年报告的影响。

方法

一项文献计量研究确定了自 2011 年以来所有关于专业评估的出版物,并注意到那些引用原始报告的出版物。对文章进行编码,以确定引用的原因和评估的新趋势。文献计量数据由在重要国际教育会议上举行的讨论组补充。

结果

在 Google Scholar 上找到了 600 篇关于专业评估的出版物,在 Web of Science 上找到了 164 篇,其中 177 篇(30%)和 84 篇(50%)分别引用了原始 IWG 出版物。英语出版物最为常见(83%),但也有来自 40 个国家的作者用 13 种其他语言撰写的文章。该报告被广泛引用,以证明对一般专业精神的关注(41%)、对专业精神的评估(38%)以及对不同国家和职业的专业精神的探索(25%)是合理的。主题分析显示,在 2011 年建议的 9 个研究领域中,9 个类别中有 7 个得到了代表,而且语言和文化的研究也有了很大的增加。

结论

尽管专业评估仍然是一个挑战,但研究基础仍在不断扩大,特别是与跨文化和语言的专业精神相关的研究,并且有很大比例的出版物引用了 IWG 的建议。关于患者观点的研究和写作仍然存在差距。

相似文献

1
Assessment of professionalism: From where have we come - to where are we going? An update from the Ottawa Consensus Group on the assessment of professionalism.专业精神评估:从何而来——走向何方?渥太华专业精神评估共识小组的最新进展。
Med Teach. 2019 Mar;41(3):249-255. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1543862. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
2
A comparative bibliometric analysis of the top 150 cited papers in hypospadiology (1945-2013).尿道下裂(1945 - 2013年)领域被引用次数排名前150的论文的比较文献计量分析
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):85.e1-85.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.022. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
3
Critical assessment of progress of medical sciences in Iran and Turkey: the way developing countries with limited resources should make effective contributions to the production of science.伊朗和土耳其医学科学进展的批判性评估:资源有限的发展中国家为科学产出做出有效贡献的途径。
Arch Iran Med. 2011 Nov;14(6):370-7.
4
Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.OCRA 方法评估上肢生物力学过载风险的科学基础,作为 ISO 生物力学风险因素标准中的首选方法。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):436-438. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3746.
5
The highly-cited Electrocardiogram-related articles in science citation index expanded: characteristics and hotspots.科学引文索引扩展版中高被引的心电图相关文章:特征与热点
J Electrocardiol. 2014 Sep-Oct;47(5):738-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
6
Global research production in glyphosate intoxication from 1978 to 2015: A bibliometric analysis.1978年至2015年全球草甘膦中毒研究成果:文献计量分析。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2017 Oct;36(10):997-1006. doi: 10.1177/0960327116678299. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
7
Highly cited articles in health care sciences and services field in Science Citation Index Expanded. A bibliometric analysis for 1958 - 2012.《科学引文索引扩展版》中医疗保健科学与服务领域的高被引文章。1958 - 2012年的文献计量分析
Methods Inf Med. 2014;53(6):446-58. doi: 10.3414/ME14-01-0022. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
8
The Most Cited Works in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most Cited Articles.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血领域被引用次数最多的文献:对100篇被引用次数最多文章的文献计量分析
World Neurosurg. 2016 May;89:587-592.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.072. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
9
Use of Bibliometric Analysis to Assess the Scientific Productivity and Impact of the Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System Program, 2006-2012.运用文献计量分析评估全球新发传染病监测与应对系统项目(2006 - 2012年)的科研生产力与影响力
Mil Med. 2017 May;182(5):e1749-e1756. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00276.
10
Analysis of Orthopaedic Research Produced During the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.伊拉克和阿富汗战争期间骨科研究分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Sep;473(9):2777-84. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4244-7.

引用本文的文献

1
From unconditionality to disenchantment among primary healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study from Madrid, Spain.新冠疫情期间基层医疗保健专业人员从无条件奉献到不再抱有幻想:来自西班牙马德里的一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 24;15(7):e090248. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090248.
2
Ethical issues in unprofessional behavior of residents who dispute dismissal: ten year analysis of case law in hospital-based specialties.对驳回申诉的住院医师不专业行为的伦理问题:对医院各专科判例法的十年分析
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Feb 13;26(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01180-x.
3
When, where and how should we assess professionalism in undergraduate medical education? Practical tips from an international conference roundtable discussion.
我们应该在何时、何地以及如何评估本科医学教育中的职业素养?来自一次国际会议圆桌讨论的实用建议。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Nov 18;14:280. doi: 10.12688/mep.20532.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Professional judgement: a social practice perspective on a multiple mini-interview for specialty training selection.专业判断:关于专科培训选拔多重小型面试的社会实践视角
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 3;25(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06535-3.
5
Adaptation of the professionalism mini-evaluation exercise instrument into Turkish: a validity and reliability study.将《职业精神迷你评估练习工具》改编为土耳其语:一项有效性和可靠性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 26;23(1):698. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04675-6.
6
The most influence factor of the medical competence achievement regarding patient management ability on medical school graduates.医学院毕业生的患者管理能力的医学能力成就的最主要影响因素。
Korean J Med Educ. 2023 Jun;35(2):143-152. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.255. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
7
The Role of Religious Culture in Medical Professionalism in a Muslim Arab Society.宗教文化在穆斯林阿拉伯社会医学职业精神中的作用。
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Feb 24;12(1):56-67. doi: 10.5334/pme.920. eCollection 2023.
8
Professionalism among academic educational leaders: A concept analysis.学术教育领导者的专业素养:概念分析
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2022 Oct;10(4):259-266. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2022.93131.1517.
9
Translating and validating a Japanese version of the instrument for patient assessment of medical professionalism (J-IPAMP): a cross-sectional survey.翻译并验证一种用于评估患者医学职业道德的工具(J-IPAMP)的日文版:一项横断面调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 23;22(1):641. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03699-8.
10
Student perspectives on programmatic assessment in a large medical programme: A critical realist analysis.学生对大型医学项目中计划性评估的看法:一个批判现实主义的分析。
Med Educ. 2022 Sep;56(9):901-914. doi: 10.1111/medu.14807. Epub 2022 Apr 29.