• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测中低收入国家出狱人员的暴力再犯罪情况:塔吉克斯坦对OxRec的验证

Predicting Violent Reoffending in Individuals Released From Prison in a Lower-Middle-Income Country: A Validation of OxRec in Tajikistan.

作者信息

Beaudry Gabrielle, Yu Rongqin, Alaei Arash, Alaei Kamiar, Fazel Seena

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Department of Health Care Administration, California State University Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 25;13:805141. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.805141. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.805141
PMID:35546919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9082534/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although around 70% of the world's prison population live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), risk assessment tools for criminal recidivism have been developed and validated in high-income countries (HICs). Validating such tools in LMIC settings is important for the risk management of people released from prison, development of evidence-based intervention programmes, and effective allocation of limited resources.

METHODS

We aimed to externally validate a scalable risk assessment tool, the Oxford Risk of Recidivism (OxRec) tool, which was developed in Sweden, using data from a cohort of people released from prisons in Tajikistan. Data were collected from interviews (for predictors) and criminal records (for some predictors and main outcomes). Individuals were first interviewed in prison and then followed up over a 1-year period for post-release violent reoffending outcomes. We assessed the predictive performance of OxRec by testing discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; AUC) and calibration (calibration statistics and plots). In addition, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for different predetermined risk thresholds.

RESULTS

The cohort included 970 individuals released from prison. During the 12-month follow-up, 144 (15%) were reincarcerated for violent crimes. The original model performed well. The discriminative ability of OxRec Tajikistan was good (AUC = 0.70; 95% CI 0.66-0.75). The calibration plot suggested an underestimation of observed risk probabilities. However, after recalibration, model performance was improved (Brier score = 0.12; calibration in the large was 1.09). At a selected risk threshold of 15%, the tool had a sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 65%, PPV 23% and NPV 90%. In addition, OxRec was feasible to use, despite challenges to risk prediction in LMICs.

CONCLUSION

In an external validation in a LMIC, the OxRec tool demonstrated good performance in multiple measures. OxRec could be used in Tajikistan to help prioritize interventions for people who are at high-risk of violent reoffending after incarceration and screen out others who are at lower risk of violent reoffending. The use of validated risk assessment tools in LMICs could improve risk stratification and inform the development of future interventions tailored at modifiable risk factors for recidivism, such as substance use and mental health problems.

摘要

背景

尽管全球约70%的监狱人口生活在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),但针对刑事累犯的风险评估工具却是在高收入国家(HICs)开发和验证的。在LMICs环境中验证此类工具对于出狱人员的风险管理、基于证据的干预计划的制定以及有限资源的有效分配至关重要。

方法

我们旨在使用来自塔吉克斯坦出狱人员队列的数据,对一种可扩展的风险评估工具——牛津累犯风险(OxRec)工具进行外部验证,该工具是在瑞典开发的。数据通过访谈(获取预测因素)和犯罪记录(获取一些预测因素和主要结果)收集。个体首先在监狱中接受访谈,然后在出狱后的1年时间里对其暴力再犯罪结果进行随访。我们通过测试区分度(受试者操作特征曲线下面积;AUC)和校准度(校准统计量和图表)来评估OxRec的预测性能。此外,我们针对不同的预定风险阈值计算了敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。

结果

该队列包括970名出狱人员。在12个月的随访期间,144人(15%)因暴力犯罪再次入狱。原始模型表现良好。OxRec塔吉克斯坦版本的区分能力良好(AUC = 0.70;95%CI 0.66 - 0.75)。校准图显示观察到的风险概率被低估。然而,重新校准后,模型性能得到改善(Brier分数 = 0.12;总体校准度为1.09)。在选定的15%风险阈值下,该工具的敏感度为60%,特异度为65%,PPV为23%,NPV为90%。此外,尽管在LMICs中进行风险预测存在挑战,但OxRec使用起来是可行的。

结论

在LMICs的一项外部验证中,OxRec工具在多项指标上表现良好。OxRec可用于塔吉克斯坦,以帮助对出狱后有暴力再犯罪高风险的人员优先进行干预,并筛选出暴力再犯罪风险较低的其他人员。在LMICs中使用经过验证的风险评估工具可以改善风险分层,并为未来针对累犯的可改变风险因素(如药物使用和心理健康问题)量身定制的干预措施的制定提供依据。

相似文献

1
Predicting Violent Reoffending in Individuals Released From Prison in a Lower-Middle-Income Country: A Validation of OxRec in Tajikistan.预测中低收入国家出狱人员的暴力再犯罪情况:塔吉克斯坦对OxRec的验证
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 25;13:805141. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.805141. eCollection 2022.
2
Prediction of violent reoffending on release from prison: derivation and external validation of a scalable tool.预测出狱后暴力再犯罪:一种可扩展工具的推导与外部验证
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;3(6):535-43. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00103-6. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
3
Prediction of violent reoffending in prisoners and individuals on probation: a Dutch validation study (OxRec).罪犯和缓刑犯暴力再犯预测:荷兰验证研究(OxRec)。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):841. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37539-x.
4
Development and Validation of a Prediction Tool for Reoffending Risk in Domestic Violence.家庭暴力再犯风险预测工具的开发与验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2325494. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25494.
5
Towards a More Evidence-Based Risk Assessment for People in the Criminal Justice System: the Case of OxRec in the Netherlands.迈向对刑事司法系统中的人群进行更基于证据的风险评估:以荷兰的OxRec为例。
Eur J Crim Pol Res. 2022;28(3):397-406. doi: 10.1007/s10610-022-09520-y. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
6
Prediction of reoffending risk in men convicted of sexual offences: development and validation of novel and scalable risk assessment tools (OxRIS).对犯有性犯罪的男性再次犯罪风险的预测:新型可扩展风险评估工具(OxRIS)的开发与验证
J Crim Justice. 2022 Sep-Oct;82:101935. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101935.
7
Association Between Prescription of Major Psychotropic Medications and Violent Reoffending After Prison Release.主要精神药物处方与出狱后暴力再犯罪之间的关联。
JAMA. 2016 Nov 1;316(17):1798-1807. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.15380.
8
Identification of low risk of violent crime in severe mental illness with a clinical prediction tool (Oxford Mental Illness and Violence tool [OxMIV]): a derivation and validation study.使用临床预测工具(牛津精神疾病与暴力工具[OxMIV])识别严重精神疾病患者暴力犯罪低风险:一项推导与验证研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;4(6):461-468. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30109-8. Epub 2017 May 4.
9
How Does the Skeletal Oncology Research Group Algorithm's Prediction of 5-year Survival in Patients with Chondrosarcoma Perform on International Validation?骨肿瘤研究组算法对软骨肉瘤患者 5 年生存率的预测在国际验证中的表现如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2300-2308. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001305.
10
LMIC-PRIEST: Derivation and validation of a clinical severity score for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19 in a middle-income setting.低收入和中等收入国家-预测急性疾病严重程度的临床评分工具:针对中等收入环境下疑似新冠肺炎成年急性病患者的临床严重程度评分的推导与验证
medRxiv. 2022 Nov 7:2022.11.06.22281986. doi: 10.1101/2022.11.06.22281986.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of violent reoffending in people released from prison in England: External validation study of a risk assessment tool (OxRec).英格兰出狱人员暴力再犯罪的预测:一种风险评估工具(OxRec)的外部验证研究
J Crim Justice. 2023 May;86:102061. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102061.
2
HIV, substance use, and mental health care in prisons.监狱中的艾滋病毒、物质使用与精神卫生保健
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;9(9):694-695. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00243-7. Epub 2022 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

1
The predictive performance of criminal risk assessment tools used at sentencing: Systematic review of validation studies.量刑时使用的犯罪风险评估工具的预测性能:验证研究的系统评价
J Crim Justice. 2022 Jul-Aug;81:101902. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101902.
2
Validation of a simplified risk prediction model using a cloud based critical care registry in a lower-middle income country.利用基于云的重症监护注册系统在中低收入国家验证简化的风险预测模型。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244989. eCollection 2020.
3
A systematic review of qualitative evidence on barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) programmes in prisons.
监狱中阿片类激动剂治疗(OAT)项目实施的障碍和促进因素的定性证据的系统评价。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jan;87:102978. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102978. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
4
Ethical guidance for health research in prisons in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.中低收入国家监狱中卫生研究的伦理指导:范围综述。
Public Health. 2020 Sep;186:217-227. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
5
Cohort Studies: Design, Analysis, and Reporting.队列研究:设计、分析和报告。
Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1S):S72-S78. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.014.
6
Challenges in dementia risk prediction in low-income and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家痴呆症风险预测面临的挑战。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Apr;8(4):e458-e459. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30077-2.
7
A systematic review of criminal recidivism rates worldwide: 3-year update.全球犯罪累犯率的系统综述:三年更新
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Nov 3;4:28. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14970.3. eCollection 2019.
8
Severe mental disorders among prisoners in low-income and middle-income countries: reaching the difficult to reach.
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Apr;7(4):e392-e393. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30057-9.
9
Prediction of violent reoffending in prisoners and individuals on probation: a Dutch validation study (OxRec).罪犯和缓刑犯暴力再犯预测:荷兰验证研究(OxRec)。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):841. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37539-x.
10
Validation in prediction research: the waste by data splitting.预测研究中的验证:数据分割造成的浪费。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Nov;103:131-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Jul 29.