• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Citizens' juries can bring public voices on overdiagnosis into policy making.

作者信息

Degeling Chris, Thomas Rae, Rychetnik Lucie

机构信息

Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, University of Wollongong, Australia.

Centre for Research in Evidence Based Practice, Bond University, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ. 2019 Jan 30;364:l351. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l351.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.l351
PMID:30700440
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Citizens' juries can bring public voices on overdiagnosis into policy making.公民陪审团可以将公众对过度诊断的声音带入政策制定过程。
BMJ. 2019 Jan 30;364:l351. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l351.
2
Do consumer voices in health-care citizens' juries matter?医疗保健公民陪审团中的消费者声音重要吗？
Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1015-22. doi: 10.1111/hex.12397. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
3
Citizens' juries: the public verdict on antibiotic resistance.公民陪审团：对抗生素耐药性的公众裁决
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Oct;4(10):779. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30264-8. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
4
The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: a systematic review.公民陪审团在卫生政策决策中的应用：系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;109:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
5
Citizens' juries for health policy.卫生政策公民陪审团
BMJ. 2017 Jun 2;357:j2650. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2650.
6
Evaluating the use of citizens' juries in food policy: a case study of food regulation.评估公民陪审团在食品政策中的使用：以食品监管为例。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jun 19;13:596. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-596.
7
Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: the role of citizens' deliberation.制定关于乳腺癌群体筛查的政策决策：公民审议的作用。
Health Policy. 2008 Mar;85(3):314-20. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.08.007. Epub 2007 Oct 10.
8
From passive subject to active agent: the potential of Citizens' Juries for nursing research.从被动参与者到积极推动者：公民陪审团在护理研究中的潜力。
Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Oct;27(7):788-95. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.10.012. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
9
Citizens' juries: more questions than answers?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Sep;64(9):750-1. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.099952.
10
Influencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of Citizens'/community juries.通过公众审议影响卫生政策：从二十年公民/社区陪审团中汲取的经验教训。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;179:166-171. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards an Ethical Analysis of Research in One Health (EAROH).迈向“同一健康”研究的伦理分析（EAROH）
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Dec 13. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10406-3.
2
Older people's perspectives on frailty screening in primary care settings - a citizens' jury study.老年人对基层医疗环境中衰弱筛查的看法——一项公民陪审团研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Dec 2;25(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02626-8.
3
Community perspectives on the benefits and risks of technologically enhanced communicable disease surveillance systems: a report on four community juries.
社区对增强型传染病监测系统的效益和风险的看法：四个社区陪审团的报告。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Apr 25;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00474-6.