Suppr超能文献

一项关于在脓毒性休克初始治疗中遵循 2016 年《拯救脓毒症运动指南》进行液体复苏和血管加压药治疗的国际调查。

An international survey of adherence to Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2016 regarding fluid resuscitation and vasopressors in the initial management of septic shock.

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit of the Shaare Zedek Medical Center and the Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.

Emergency Medicine Department, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2022 Apr;68:144-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.11.016. Epub 2021 Dec 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our survey aimed to evaluate adherence to Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) Guidelines 2016 among intensive care practitioners and to identify issues that remain controversial or lack clarity.

METHODS

Members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) were surveyed using an anonymous web-based survey written by an international group of experts. The primary outcome measure was the rate of adherence to specific recommendations. Secondary outcomes were to describe areas of controversy and lack of data and to associate specific practices with clinician characteristics.

RESULTS

Overall 820 questionnaires were completed. The SCC recommendations 2016 most adhered to were the choice of norepinephrine as first-line vasoactive drug (96.5%), vasopressor prescription based on therapeutic goal rather than dose (83.4%), targeting a specific mean arterial blood pressure during vasopressor use (77.9%), monitoring of blood pressure invasively (62.8%) and adding vasopressin or epinephrine as a second vasoactive agent (83.4%). We identified an internal conflict with regards to parallel versus sequential administration of fluids and vasoactive drugs and regional differences in practice that may be related to drug availabilities.

CONCLUSION

The use of vasopressors and fluid use in septic shock is largely compliant with current guidelines but several controversies should be addressed in future guideline iterations.

摘要

背景

我们的调查旨在评估重症监护医师对《拯救脓毒症运动(SSC)2016 指南》的遵循情况,并确定仍存在争议或缺乏明确性的问题。

方法

采用由国际专家组编写的匿名网络调查,对欧洲重症监护医学学会(ESICM)的成员进行调查。主要结局指标是特定建议的遵循率。次要结局是描述有争议和缺乏数据的领域,并将特定实践与临床医生特征联系起来。

结果

共完成了 820 份问卷。对 2016 年 SCC 建议遵循程度最高的是选择去甲肾上腺素作为一线血管活性药物(96.5%)、根据治疗目标而不是剂量开具血管加压药(83.4%)、在使用血管加压药时靶向特定的平均动脉血压(77.9%)、侵入性监测血压(62.8%)以及添加血管加压素或肾上腺素作为第二种血管活性药物(83.4%)。我们发现,在液体和血管活性药物的并行与序贯给药方面存在内部冲突,并且实践中存在区域差异,这可能与药物的可获得性有关。

结论

脓毒性休克中血管加压药和液体的使用在很大程度上符合当前指南,但在未来的指南迭代中应解决几个争议问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验