ELsyad Moustafa Abdou, Emera Radwa Mk, Ibrahim Abdullah Mohamed
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 March/April;34(2):381–389. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6789. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
This study evaluated the influence of labial implant inclination on the retention and stability of different resilient stud attachments for mandibular implant overdentures.
Four identical mandibular edentulous acrylic resin models were fabricated. For each model, two implants were inserted at the canine areas with different degrees of labial inclination: 0, 10, 20, and 30 degrees. Four experimental overdentures were fabricated over the models and fitted to the implants using resilient stud attachments. Regular retentive inserts (extra-light, light, and medium retention) were used for all implant inclinations, and extended-range inserts (extra-light and medium retention) were used for 30-degree inclination only. Vertical (retention) and oblique (stability) dislodging forces (lateral, anterior, and posterior) were evaluated initially (initial retention) and after overdenture insertion and removal (final retention).
After repeated insertions and removals, inclination of 30 degrees recorded the highest retention and lateral stability, and 0 degrees recorded the highest posterior stability; 20 degrees showed the lowest retention, and 30 degrees recorded the lowest posterior stability. The highest stability and retention values were recorded with light and medium regular inserts, and the lowest values were noted with extra-light regular inserts.
Within the limits of this study, moderate labial implant inclination (10 degrees and 20 degrees) was shown to negatively affect retention and anterior/lateral stability, and excessive implant inclination (30 degrees) to negatively affect posterior stability. When implants are inclined labially, it is recommended to use light and medium regular stud attachments to obtain high levels of retention and stability for two-implant-retained overdentures.
本研究评估了唇侧种植体倾斜度对下颌种植覆盖义齿不同弹性柱附着体固位和稳定性的影响。
制作四个相同的下颌无牙丙烯酸树脂模型。对于每个模型,在尖牙区植入两颗种植体,使其具有不同程度的唇侧倾斜度:0度、10度、20度和30度。在模型上制作四个实验性覆盖义齿,并使用弹性柱附着体与种植体适配。所有种植体倾斜度均使用常规固位嵌体(超轻、轻和中固位),仅30度倾斜度使用扩展范围嵌体(超轻和中固位)。在最初(初始固位)以及覆盖义齿插入和取出后(最终固位)评估垂直(固位)和斜向(稳定性)脱位力(侧向、向前和向后)。
在反复插入和取出后,30度倾斜度记录的固位和侧向稳定性最高,0度记录的向后稳定性最高;20度显示固位最低,30度记录的向后稳定性最低。轻和中常规嵌体记录的稳定性和固位值最高,超轻常规嵌体记录的最低。
在本研究的范围内,适度的唇侧种植体倾斜度(10度和20度)对固位以及前/侧向稳定性有负面影响,而过度的种植体倾斜度(30度)对向后稳定性有负面影响。当种植体唇侧倾斜时,建议使用轻和中常规柱附着体,以获得双种植体支持覆盖义齿的高水平固位和稳定性。