Faculty of Engineering , Bar-Ilan University , Ramat-Gan 5290002 , Israel.
Bar-Ilan Institute of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials , Bar-Ilan University , Ramat-Gan 5290002 , Israel.
Nano Lett. 2019 Mar 13;19(3):1451-1459. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03879. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
Developing neuronal axons are directed by chemical and physical signals toward a myriad of target cells. According to current dogma, the resulting network architecture is critically shaped by electrical interconnections, the synapses; however, key mechanisms translating neuronal interactions into neuronal growth behavior during network formation are still unresolved. To elucidate these mechanisms, we examined neurons interfacing nanopatterned substrates and compared them to natural interneuron interactions. We grew similar neuronal populations under three connectivity conditions, (1) the neurons are isolated, (2) the neurons are interconnected, and (3) the neurons are connected only to artificial substrates, then quantitatively compared both the cell morphologies and the transcriptome-expression profiles. Our analysis shows that whereas axon-guidance signaling pathways in isolated neurons are predominant, in isolated neurons interfacing nanotopography, these pathways are downregulated, similar to the interconnected neurons. Moreover, in nanotopography, interfacing neuron genes related to synaptogenesis and synaptic regulation are highly expressed, that is, again resembling the behavior of interconnected neurons. These molecular findings demonstrate that interactions with nanotopographies, although not leading to electrical coupling, play a comparable functional role in two major routes, neuronal guidance and network formation, with high relevance to the design of regenerative interfaces.
发育中的神经元轴突被化学和物理信号引导,向无数靶细胞生长。根据目前的观点,形成的网络结构主要由电连接(即突触)决定;然而,在网络形成过程中,将神经元相互作用转化为神经元生长行为的关键机制仍未解决。为了阐明这些机制,我们研究了与纳米图案化基底相互作用的神经元,并将其与天然神经元相互作用进行了比较。我们在三种连接条件下培养了相似的神经元群体:(1)神经元是孤立的,(2)神经元相互连接,(3)神经元仅与人工基底连接,然后定量比较了细胞形态和转录组表达谱。我们的分析表明,虽然孤立神经元中的轴突导向信号通路占主导地位,但在与纳米拓扑结构相互作用的孤立神经元中,这些通路被下调,类似于相互连接的神经元。此外,在纳米拓扑结构中,与突触发生和突触调节相关的界面神经元基因高度表达,这与相互连接的神经元的行为相似。这些分子发现表明,尽管与纳米拓扑结构的相互作用不会导致电耦联,但它们在神经元导向和网络形成这两个主要途径中发挥着类似的功能作用,这与再生界面的设计具有高度相关性。