United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Delaware State University, James Baker Center, Dover, DE, 19901, USA.
College of Agriculture Science and Technology, Delaware State University, Dover, DE, 19901, USA.
Food Environ Virol. 2019 Jun;11(2):101-112. doi: 10.1007/s12560-019-09365-5. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) from three locations along the Delaware Bay were surveyed monthly from May to October 2017 for levels of total Vibrio parahaemolyticus, pathogenic strains of V. parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus, and for strain-specific bacteriophages against vibrios (vibriophages). The objectives were to determine (a) whether vibriophages against known strains or serotypes of clinical and environmental vibrios were detectable in oysters from the Delaware Bay and (b) whether vibriophage presence or absence corresponded with Vibrio abundances in oysters. Host cells for phage assays included pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus serotypes O3:K6, O1:KUT (untypable) and O1:K1, as well as clinical and environmental strains of V. vulnificus. Vibriophages against some, but not all, pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus serotypes were readily detected in Delaware Bay oysters. In July, abundances of total and pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus at one site spiked to levels exceeding regulatory guidelines. Phages against three V. parahaemolyticus host serotypes were detected in these same oysters, but also in oysters with low V. parahaemolyticus levels. Serotype-specific vibriophage presence or absence did not correspond with abundances of total or pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus. Vibriophages were not detected against three V. vulnificus host strains, even though V. vulnificus were readily detectable in oyster tissues. Selected phage isolates against V. parahaemolyticus showed high host specificity. Transmission electron micrographs revealed that most isolates were ~ 60-nm diameter, non-tailed phages. In conclusion, vibriophages were detected against pandemic V. parahaemolyticus O3:K6 and O1:KUT, suggesting that phage monitoring in specific host cells may be a useful technique to assess public health risks from oyster consumption.
2017 年 5 月至 10 月,从特拉华湾的三个地点每月对东方牡蛎(Crassostrea virginica)进行调查,以检测总副溶血性弧菌、副溶血性弧菌致病性菌株和创伤弧菌的水平,以及针对弧菌(噬菌体)的菌株特异性噬菌体。目的是确定:(a)是否可以在来自特拉华湾的牡蛎中检测到针对临床和环境弧菌已知菌株或血清型的噬菌体;(b)噬菌体的存在与否是否与牡蛎中弧菌的丰度相对应。噬菌体检测的宿主细胞包括致病性副溶血性弧菌血清型 O3:K6、O1:KUT(无法分型)和 O1:K1,以及临床和环境副溶血性弧菌菌株。在特拉华湾牡蛎中,很容易检测到针对一些但不是所有致病性副溶血性弧菌血清型的噬菌体。7 月,一个地点的总副溶血性弧菌和致病性副溶血性弧菌的丰度飙升至超过监管指南的水平。在这些相同的牡蛎中,也在副溶血性弧菌水平较低的牡蛎中,检测到针对三种副溶血性弧菌宿主血清型的噬菌体,但也检测到针对三种副溶血性弧菌宿主血清型的噬菌体。血清型特异性噬菌体的存在与否与总副溶血性弧菌或致病性副溶血性弧菌的丰度无关。尽管在牡蛎组织中很容易检测到创伤弧菌,但针对三种创伤弧菌宿主菌株的噬菌体未被检测到。针对副溶血性弧菌的选定噬菌体分离株表现出高度的宿主特异性。透射电子显微镜照片显示,大多数分离株的直径约为 60nm,无尾噬菌体。总之,针对流行的副溶血性弧菌 O3:K6 和 O1:KUT 检测到了噬菌体,这表明针对特定宿主细胞的噬菌体监测可能是评估食用牡蛎带来的公共卫生风险的有用技术。