Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, MC 0905, San Diego, CA, 92093-0905, USA.
School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Can J Public Health. 2019 Apr;110(2):236-243. doi: 10.17269/s41997-019-00178-4. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
The school environment is an ideal setting to introduce policies to prevent smoking behaviour. However, there may be variability in the strength of school board and secondary school tobacco policies, which may affect student smoking behaviours. This study assessed the strength of a sample of school board and secondary school tobacco policies and examined the association with student smoking behaviours.
Tobacco policies from school boards (n = 21/26) and secondary schools (n = 43/81) that participated in the COMPASS study during 2015-2016 were obtained online. A standardized instrument was used to assess the strength of school board and secondary school tobacco policies on four domains. Using the sample of students from schools with identified policies (n = 22,696), separate multilevel regression models examined the association between school policy scores and a student's susceptibility to smoking, ever smoking, current smoking, and perceived support of the school environment.
The mean school board tobacco policy score was 13.7/40 and the mean secondary school tobacco policy score was 11.3/40. Students were significantly less likely to report current smoking (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) and more likely to report a supportive school environment (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08) with each four-unit (i.e., 10%) increase in school tobacco policy score.
The vast majority of school board and secondary school tobacco policies were missing components and therefore could not be considered comprehensive. Stronger school tobacco policies may help to reduce student current smoking behaviours.
学校环境是引入预防吸烟行为政策的理想场所。然而,学校董事会和中学的烟草政策的力度可能存在差异,这可能会影响学生的吸烟行为。本研究评估了一系列学校董事会和中学烟草政策的力度,并研究了其与学生吸烟行为的关系。
从参加 2015-2016 年 COMPASS 研究的学校董事会(n=21/26)和中学(n=43/81)获取在线烟草政策。使用标准化工具评估了学校董事会和中学烟草政策在四个领域的力度。在有明确政策的学校的学生样本(n=22696)中,分别使用多水平回归模型来研究学校政策评分与学生吸烟易感性、曾经吸烟、当前吸烟和对学校环境支持度的感知之间的关系。
学校董事会烟草政策平均得分为 13.7/40,中学烟草政策平均得分为 11.3/40。学生当前吸烟的可能性显著降低(OR 0.95,95%CI 0.91-0.99),而对学校环境的支持度的感知则显著提高(OR 1.06,95%CI 1.04-1.08),这与学校烟草政策评分每增加四个单位(即 10%)相关。
绝大多数学校董事会和中学的烟草政策都缺乏一些要素,因此不能被认为是全面的。更强有力的学校烟草政策可能有助于减少学生的当前吸烟行为。