• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing the strength of secondary school tobacco policies of schools in the COMPASS study and the association to student smoking behaviours.评估 COMPASS 研究中学校的中学烟草政策的力度及其与学生吸烟行为的关联。
Can J Public Health. 2019 Apr;110(2):236-243. doi: 10.17269/s41997-019-00178-4. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
2
The influence of school smoking policies on student tobacco use.学校吸烟政策对学生烟草使用的影响。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Sep;161(9):842-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.9.842.
3
The influence of school policies on smoking prevalence among students in grades 5-9, Canada, 2004-2005.2004-2005 年加拿大 5-9 年级学生中学校政策对吸烟流行率的影响。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Nov;7(6):A129. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
4
School tobacco control policies related to students' smoking and attitudes toward smoking: national survey results, 1999-2000.与学生吸烟及对吸烟态度相关的学校控烟政策:1999 - 2000年全国调查结果
Health Educ Behav. 2005 Dec;32(6):780-94. doi: 10.1177/1090198105277451.
5
School smoking policy characteristics and individual perceptions of the school tobacco context: are they linked to students' smoking status?学校吸烟政策特点及个人对学校烟草环境的认知:它们与学生的吸烟状况有关联吗?
J Youth Adolesc. 2009 Nov;38(10):1374-87. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9422-z. Epub 2009 Jun 7.
6
Multilevel analysis of school anti-smoking education and current cigarette use among South African students.南非学生学校反吸烟教育与当前吸烟情况的多层次分析
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Jan 24;26:37. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.26.37.7880. eCollection 2017.
7
Exploring the cross-sectional association between the strength of school vaping policies and student vaping behaviours using data from the 2021-2022 COMPASS Study.利用2021 - 2022年COMPASS研究的数据,探索学校电子烟政策力度与学生电子烟行为之间的横断面关联。
Can J Public Health. 2024 Dec;115(6):936-945. doi: 10.17269/s41997-024-00919-0. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
8
Are School Substance Use Policy Violation Disciplinary Consequences Associated with Student Engagement in Cannabis?学校药物使用违规处罚后果是否与学生吸食大麻有关?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 31;17(15):5549. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155549.
9
Is there a relation between school smoking policies and youth cigarette smoking knowledge and behaviors?学校吸烟政策与青少年吸烟知识及行为之间存在关联吗?
Health Educ Res. 2006 Feb;21(1):108-15. doi: 10.1093/her/cyh047. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
10
Do stronger school smoking policies make a difference? Analysis of the health behaviour in school-aged children survey.更强有力的学校吸烟政策会产生影响吗?对学龄儿童健康行为调查的分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Dec;26(6):964-968. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw093. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Cannabis Policy Research at a Pivotal Time for Policy Development.在政策制定的关键时期改进大麻政策研究。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Nov;114(S8):S635-S638. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307799.
2
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of population-level interventions to tackle smoking behaviour.一项关于解决吸烟行为的人群层面干预措施的系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Dec;8(12):2367-2391. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02002-7. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
3
Exploring the cross-sectional association between the strength of school vaping policies and student vaping behaviours using data from the 2021-2022 COMPASS Study.利用2021 - 2022年COMPASS研究的数据,探索学校电子烟政策力度与学生电子烟行为之间的横断面关联。
Can J Public Health. 2024 Dec;115(6):936-945. doi: 10.17269/s41997-024-00919-0. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
4
California School Staff Reports of Seeing Students Vaping at School and Disciplinary Actions.加利福尼亚州学校工作人员报告在学校看到学生吸电子烟和采取的纪律处分措施。
J Sch Nurs. 2024 Dec;40(6):618-629. doi: 10.1177/10598405221127694. Epub 2022 Sep 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the Predictive Validity of the Susceptibility to Smoking Construct for Tobacco Cigarettes, Alternative Tobacco Products, and E-Cigarettes.探究吸烟易感性结构对传统烟草制品、新型烟草制品和电子烟的预测效度。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Feb 18;21(3):323-330. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx265.
2
School policies for preventing smoking among young people.学校预防青少年吸烟的政策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 24;2014(10):CD009990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009990.pub2.
3
The COMPASS study: a longitudinal hierarchical research platform for evaluating natural experiments related to changes in school-level programs, policies and built environment resources.COMPASS研究:一个纵向分层研究平台,用于评估与学校层面的项目、政策和建筑环境资源变化相关的自然实验。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 8;14:331. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-331.
4
Anti-tobacco policy in schools: upcoming preventive strategy or prevention myth? A review of 31 studies.学校的反烟草政策:即将到来的预防策略还是预防神话?对31项研究的综述
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23(4):295-301. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050846. Epub 2013 May 28.
5
Assessment of validity of self-reported smoking status.自评吸烟状况的有效性评估。
Health Rep. 2012 Mar;23(1):47-53.
6
What public health strategies are needed to reduce smoking initiation?需要采取哪些公共卫生策略来减少吸烟的开始?
Tob Control. 2012 Mar;21(2):258-64. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050359.
7
Do students' perceptions of school smoking policies influence where students smoke?: Canada's Youth Smoking Survey.学生对学校禁烟政策的看法是否影响学生吸烟的地点?:加拿大青少年吸烟调查。
Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Dec;21(12):2085-92. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9627-1. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
8
School smoking policy characteristics and individual perceptions of the school tobacco context: are they linked to students' smoking status?学校吸烟政策特点及个人对学校烟草环境的认知:它们与学生的吸烟状况有关联吗?
J Youth Adolesc. 2009 Nov;38(10):1374-87. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9422-z. Epub 2009 Jun 7.
9
Evaluating the strength of school tobacco policies: the development of a practical rating system.评估学校烟草政策的力度:实用评级系统的开发
J Sch Health. 2009 Oct;79(10):495-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00439.x.
10
The relationship between school policies and youth tobacco use.学校政策与青少年烟草使用之间的关系。
J Sch Health. 2009 Jan;79(1):17-23; quiz 41-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00369.x.

评估 COMPASS 研究中学校的中学烟草政策的力度及其与学生吸烟行为的关联。

Assessing the strength of secondary school tobacco policies of schools in the COMPASS study and the association to student smoking behaviours.

机构信息

Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, MC 0905, San Diego, CA, 92093-0905, USA.

School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2019 Apr;110(2):236-243. doi: 10.17269/s41997-019-00178-4. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

DOI:10.17269/s41997-019-00178-4
PMID:30706437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6964639/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The school environment is an ideal setting to introduce policies to prevent smoking behaviour. However, there may be variability in the strength of school board and secondary school tobacco policies, which may affect student smoking behaviours. This study assessed the strength of a sample of school board and secondary school tobacco policies and examined the association with student smoking behaviours.

METHODS

Tobacco policies from school boards (n = 21/26) and secondary schools (n = 43/81) that participated in the COMPASS study during 2015-2016 were obtained online. A standardized instrument was used to assess the strength of school board and secondary school tobacco policies on four domains. Using the sample of students from schools with identified policies (n = 22,696), separate multilevel regression models examined the association between school policy scores and a student's susceptibility to smoking, ever smoking, current smoking, and perceived support of the school environment.

RESULTS

The mean school board tobacco policy score was 13.7/40 and the mean secondary school tobacco policy score was 11.3/40. Students were significantly less likely to report current smoking (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) and more likely to report a supportive school environment (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08) with each four-unit (i.e., 10%) increase in school tobacco policy score.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of school board and secondary school tobacco policies were missing components and therefore could not be considered comprehensive. Stronger school tobacco policies may help to reduce student current smoking behaviours.

摘要

目的

学校环境是引入预防吸烟行为政策的理想场所。然而,学校董事会和中学的烟草政策的力度可能存在差异,这可能会影响学生的吸烟行为。本研究评估了一系列学校董事会和中学烟草政策的力度,并研究了其与学生吸烟行为的关系。

方法

从参加 2015-2016 年 COMPASS 研究的学校董事会(n=21/26)和中学(n=43/81)获取在线烟草政策。使用标准化工具评估了学校董事会和中学烟草政策在四个领域的力度。在有明确政策的学校的学生样本(n=22696)中,分别使用多水平回归模型来研究学校政策评分与学生吸烟易感性、曾经吸烟、当前吸烟和对学校环境支持度的感知之间的关系。

结果

学校董事会烟草政策平均得分为 13.7/40,中学烟草政策平均得分为 11.3/40。学生当前吸烟的可能性显著降低(OR 0.95,95%CI 0.91-0.99),而对学校环境的支持度的感知则显著提高(OR 1.06,95%CI 1.04-1.08),这与学校烟草政策评分每增加四个单位(即 10%)相关。

结论

绝大多数学校董事会和中学的烟草政策都缺乏一些要素,因此不能被认为是全面的。更强有力的学校烟草政策可能有助于减少学生的当前吸烟行为。