• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中危患者的死亡原因:随机手术置换与经导管主动脉瓣植入术试验。

Causes of death in intermediate-risk patients: The Randomized Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Mich.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Sep;158(3):718-728.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.129. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.129
PMID:30709668
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Examine the causes and timing of death in the Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation intermediate-risk randomized trial for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

METHODS

Causes of death were adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee and by post-hoc hierarchical classification. Causes of death were evaluated and characteristics and procedural parameters compared between patients who died and survivors for 3 time periods: early (0-30 days), recovery (31-120 days), and late (121-365 days).

RESULTS

All-cause mortality at 1 year was 6.5% after TAVR and 6.7% after SAVR. There were no differences in mortality rates between TAVR and SAVR for any of the 3 time periods. Early mortality was primarily due to technical, procedure-related problems in TAVR and due to complications in SAVR. For TAVR and SAVR, most deaths during recovery were caused by complications. Other causes, including comorbid conditions, accounted for most late deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality rates were similar for patients treated with TAVR or SAVR at any time period including at 1 year. Early cause of death was more commonly technical failure after TAVR and due to complications after SAVR. Recovery phase cause of death was dominated by complications from TAVR and SAVR. Late cause of death appeared to be independent of the procedure in both groups.

摘要

目的

研究经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)和外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)中经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中危随机试验的死亡原因和时间。

方法

由独立的临床事件委员会和事后分层分类对死亡原因进行裁决。评估死亡原因,并对 3 个时间段(0-30 天、恢复(31-120 天)和晚期(121-365 天))的死亡患者和幸存者的特征和程序参数进行比较。

结果

TAVR 术后 1 年全因死亡率为 6.5%,SAVR 术后为 6.7%。在任何 3 个时间段内,TAVR 和 SAVR 的死亡率均无差异。早期死亡率主要是由于 TAVR 中的技术和手术相关问题以及 SAVR 中的并发症所致。对于 TAVR 和 SAVR,恢复期间的大多数死亡是由并发症引起的。其他原因,包括合并症,占晚期死亡的大部分。

结论

在任何时间段,包括 1 年,接受 TAVR 或 SAVR 治疗的患者的死亡率相似。早期死亡的主要原因是 TAVR 后技术故障更多,SAVR 后并发症更多。恢复阶段的死亡原因主要是 TAVR 和 SAVR 的并发症所致。晚期死亡的原因似乎与两组的手术无关。

相似文献

1
Causes of death in intermediate-risk patients: The Randomized Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Trial.中危患者的死亡原因:随机手术置换与经导管主动脉瓣植入术试验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Sep;158(3):718-728.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.129. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
2
Causes of death from the randomized CoreValve US Pivotal High-Risk Trial.随机 CoreValve US 关键高风险试验的死亡原因。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jun;153(6):1293-1301.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.11.069. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
3
Complications After Self-expanding Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管自膨胀式或外科主动脉瓣置换术后的并发症
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29(3):321-330. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
4
Outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A single center 20-year experience.退伍军人事务医疗系统中接受经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗的中度风险患者的结局:单中心20年经验
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):390-398. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27478. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
5
Hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in female in the United States.美国女性经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的医院治疗结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 1;91(4):813-819. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27362. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
6
Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.高危手术患者中经导管主动脉瓣自膨胀置换术与外科瓣膜置换术的比较:一项关于超声心动图变化及风险预测的研究
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003426.
7
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: A meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies.低手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:随机试验和倾向评分匹配观察性研究的荟萃分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):408-416. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27518. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
8
Five-Year Outcomes of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in a Real World Population.真实世界人群中行经股动脉的经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的 5 年结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul;12(7):e007825. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007825. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
9
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk surgical patients: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.低风险外科手术患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:随机临床试验的荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Oct;20(10):838-842. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.12.023. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
10
Increasing Wait-Time Mortality for Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Population-Level Study of the Transition in Practice From Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者等待时间导致的死亡率增加:一项关于从外科主动脉瓣置换术到经导管主动脉瓣置换术实践转变的人群水平研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;13(11):e009297. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009297. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of TAVR with SAVR on clinical outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)与外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)治疗主动脉瓣狭窄患者临床结局的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 May 21;87(6):3768-3776. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003275. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low- to intermediate-risk patients: a meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.低至中度风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:对重构事件发生时间数据的荟萃分析
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Mar 31;14(2):73-84. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-etavr-0096. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
3
Antithrombotic management after aortic valve replacement with biological prosthesis: a meta-analysis.
生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术后的抗栓治疗:荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jun 26;19(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02863-z.
4
Asymptomatic Severe and Moderate Aortic Stenosis: Time for Appraisal of Treatment Indications.无症状重度和中度主动脉瓣狭窄:评估治疗指征的时机
Struct Heart. 2023 Jun 27;7(5):100201. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2023.100201. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Long-Term Mortality Due to Stroke and Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis during the COVID-19 Pandemic.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗 COVID-19 大流行期间因中风和心肌梗死导致的长期死亡率的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 21;59(1):12. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010012.
6
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 6;11(12):e054222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054222.
7
Identifying Patients without a Survival Benefit following Transfemoral and Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经股动脉和经心尖经导管主动脉瓣置换术后无生存获益患者的识别
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 24;10(21):4911. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214911.
8
Cause of Death After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: SWEDEHEART Observational Study.外科主动脉瓣置换术后的死亡原因:SWEDEHEART 观察性研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Nov 16;10(22):e022627. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022627. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
9
Timing of Intervention in Asymptomatic Patients with Aortic Stenosis.无症状主动脉瓣狭窄患者的干预时机
Eur Cardiol. 2021 Sep 3;16:e32. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2021.11. eCollection 2021 Feb.
10
Comparison of infective endocarditis risk between balloon and self-expandable valves following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后球囊扩张瓣与自膨式瓣的感染性心内膜炎风险比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jul;36(3):363-374. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00675-1. Epub 2020 May 24.