Department of Periodontology, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dental Medicine Section, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Eur J Dent Educ. 2019 Aug;23(3):251-265. doi: 10.1111/eje.12426. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
The aim of this cross-sectional study was to explore the demographic and educational patterns related to the dentists' first implant dental experience.
Participants of a Massive Open Online Course in implant dentistry who have placed and restored implants completed a 25-item online questionnaire investigating their pathway of education and assessing their experience with the "first implant placement." Exploratory analysis included hierarchical clustering using 9 demographic categorical factors.
A total of 1015 respondents from 84 countries formed 5 distinct clusters. Age and work experience were dominant clustering traits, decreasing from Cluster 1 to Cluster 5. Clusters 1 and 3 represented "senior" and "younger" general dental practitioners, respectively, whilst Clusters 2 and 4 represented post-graduate educated clinicians. Cluster 5 represented recent graduates. Asia, South America and Africa were over-represented in "younger" clusters. Time in practice was a significant determinant of attitudes, followed by completion of post-graduate education. There were significant differences in reported patterns of challenges and complications depending on dentists' time in practice, age and post-graduate education. Challenge in implant positioning was more frequently identified by "young post-graduate" educated dentists. Recent graduates reported having the fewest complications of all clusters. Obtaining implant education in University settings was most frequently recommended by clusters of dentists with post-graduate education.
Time in practice is a parameter to be considered when designing implant education. The absence of structured education and mentorship might lead to inability to properly assess treatment outcomes and identify complications. Quality-assured and practice-directed education is needed at a global level, to support in particular, recent graduates who now seem to engage with implant dentistry early in their career.
本横断面研究旨在探讨与牙医首次种植体牙科经验相关的人口统计学和教育模式。
参加种植体牙科大规模开放式在线课程并已植入和修复种植体的参与者完成了一份 25 项在线问卷,调查他们的教育途径,并评估他们在“首次种植体放置”方面的经验。探索性分析包括使用 9 个人口统计学分类因素的分层聚类。
共有来自 84 个国家的 1015 名受访者形成了 5 个不同的聚类。年龄和工作经验是主要的聚类特征,从聚类 1 到聚类 5 逐渐减少。聚类 1 和 3 分别代表“资深”和“年轻”的普通牙科医生,而聚类 2 和 4 则代表受过研究生教育的临床医生。聚类 5 代表应届毕业生。亚洲、南美洲和非洲在“年轻”聚类中占比较高。实践时间是态度的重要决定因素,其次是研究生教育的完成。根据牙医的实践时间、年龄和研究生教育,报告的挑战和并发症模式存在显著差异。“年轻的研究生”教育的牙医更频繁地发现种植体定位的挑战。所有聚类中,应届毕业生报告的并发症最少。在大学环境中获得种植体教育是最受有研究生教育的牙医推荐的。
实践时间是设计种植体教育时需要考虑的一个参数。缺乏结构化的教育和指导可能导致无法正确评估治疗效果和识别并发症。全球范围内需要有质量保证和以实践为导向的教育,特别是支持那些在职业生涯早期就开始接触种植体牙科的应届毕业生。