Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2019 Apr 1;248:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.026. Epub 2019 Jan 27.
Facebook depression is defined as feeling depressed upon too much exposure to Social networking sites (SNS). Researchers have argued that upward social comparisons made on SNS are the key to the Facebook depression phenomenon. To examine the relations between SNS usage and depression, we conducted 4 separate meta-analyses relating depression to: (1) time spent on SNS, (2) SNS checking frequency, (3) general and (4) upward social comparisons on SNS. We compared the four mean effect sizes in terms of magnitude.
Our literature search yielded 33 articles with a sample of 15,881 for time spent on SNS, 12 articles with a sample of 8041 for SNS checking frequency, and 5 articles with a sample of 1715 and 2298 for the general and the upward social comparison analyses, respectively.
In both SNS-usage analyses, greater time spent on SNS and frequency of checking SNS were associated with higher levels of depression with a small effect size. Further, higher levels of depression were associated with greater general social comparisons on SNS with a small to medium effect, and greater upward social comparisons on SNS with a medium effect. Both social comparisons on SNS were more strongly related to depression than was time spent on SNS.
Limitations include heterogeneity in effect sizes and a small number of samples for social comparison analyses.
Our results are consistent with the notion of 'Facebook depression phenomenon' and with the theoretical importance of social comparisons as an explanation.
过度接触社交网络(SNS)会让人感到抑郁,这种现象被称为“Facebook 抑郁”。研究人员认为,SNS 上的向上社会比较是导致“Facebook 抑郁”现象的关键。为了研究 SNS 使用与抑郁之间的关系,我们进行了四项独立的元分析,将抑郁与以下四个方面相关联:(1)在 SNS 上花费的时间,(2)SNS 检查频率,(3)SNS 上的一般社会比较,(4)SNS 上的向上社会比较。我们比较了这四个平均效应大小的大小。
我们的文献检索共产生了 33 篇文章,其中有 15881 人样本的时间用于 SNS,12 篇文章中有 8041 人样本的 SNS 检查频率,5 篇文章中有 1715 人和 2298 人样本分别用于一般和向上社会比较分析。
在 SNS 使用分析中,在 SNS 上花费更多的时间和更频繁地检查 SNS 与更高水平的抑郁相关,具有较小的效应大小。此外,更高水平的抑郁与 SNS 上更大的一般社会比较相关,具有较小到中等的效应,与 SNS 上更大的向上社会比较相关,具有中等效应。与 SNS 上的时间相比,这两种社会比较与抑郁的关系更为密切。
限制因素包括效应大小的异质性和社会比较分析样本数量较少。
我们的结果与“Facebook 抑郁现象”的概念以及社会比较作为解释的理论重要性一致。