• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危冠状动脉疾病预测模型。

Predictive Model for High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease.

机构信息

San Jose Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente, CA (J.J.J.).

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.B., A.C., S.V., C.B.F., K.L.L., W.S.J., D.B.M., P.S.D., M.R.P.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;12(2):e007940. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007940.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007940
PMID:30712364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6368397/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD) may be difficult to identify.

METHODS

Using the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) cohort randomized to coronary computed tomographic angiography (n=4589), 2 predictive models were developed for high-risk CAD, defined as left main stenosis (≥50% stenosis) or either (1) ≥50% stenosis [50] or (2) ≥70% stenosis [70] of 3 vessels or 2-vessel CAD involving the proximal left anterior descending artery. Pretest predictors were examined using stepwise logistic regression and assessed for discrimination and calibration.

RESULTS

High-risk CAD was identified in 6.6% [50] and 2.4% [70] of patients. Models developed to predict high-risk CAD discriminated well: [50], bias-corrected C statistic=0.73 (95% CI, 0.71-0.76); [70], bias-corrected C statistic=0.73 (95% CI, 0.68-0.77). Variables predictive of CAD in both models included family history of premature CAD, age, male sex, lower glomerular filtration rate, diabetes mellitus, elevated systolic blood pressure, and angina. Additionally, smoking history was predictive of [50] CAD and sedentary lifestyle of [70] CAD. Both models characterized high-risk CAD better than the Pooled Cohort Equation (area under the curve=0.70 and 0.71 for [50] and [70], respectively) and Diamond-Forrester risk scores (area under the curve=0.68 and 0.71, respectively). Both [50] and [70] CAD was associated with more frequent invasive interventions and adverse events than non-high-risk CAD (all P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In contemporary practice, 2.4% to 6.6% of stable, symptomatic patients requiring noninvasive testing have high-risk CAD. A simple combination of pretest clinical variables improves prediction of high-risk CAD over traditional risk assessments.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01174550.

摘要

背景

高危冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者可能难以识别。

方法

使用 PROMISE(前瞻性多中心成像研究评估胸痛)队列随机分配至冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术(n=4589),为高危 CAD 制定了 2 种预测模型,定义为左主干狭窄(≥50%狭窄)或以下任何一种情况:(1)≥50%狭窄[50]或(2)≥70%狭窄[70]的 3 支血管或 2 支血管 CAD 累及左前降支近端。使用逐步逻辑回归检查术前预测指标,并评估其区分度和校准度。

结果

高危 CAD 在 6.6%[50]和 2.4%[70]的患者中被识别。为预测高危 CAD 而制定的模型具有良好的区分度:[50],校正后的 C 统计量=0.73(95%置信区间,0.71-0.76);[70],校正后的 C 统计量=0.73(95%置信区间,0.68-0.77)。两种模型中预测 CAD 的变量包括早发性 CAD 的家族史、年龄、男性、肾小球滤过率降低、糖尿病、收缩压升高和心绞痛。此外,吸烟史与[50]CAD 相关,而久坐的生活方式与[70]CAD 相关。两种模型对高危 CAD 的描述均优于 Pooled Cohort Equation(曲线下面积为 0.70 和 0.71,分别用于[50]和[70])和 Diamond-Forrester 风险评分(曲线下面积为 0.68 和 0.71,分别用于[50]和[70])。与非高危 CAD 相比,[50]和[70]CAD 更常进行有创介入和不良事件(均 P<0.0001)。

结论

在当代实践中,2.4%至 6.6%的需要非侵入性检查的稳定、有症状的患者患有高危 CAD。术前临床变量的简单组合可提高对高危 CAD 的预测,优于传统风险评估。

临床试验注册

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT01174550。

相似文献

1
Predictive Model for High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease.高危冠状动脉疾病预测模型。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;12(2):e007940. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007940.
2
The External Validity of Prediction Models for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Stable Chest Pain: Insights From the PROMISE Trial.稳定型胸痛患者阻塞性冠状动脉疾病诊断预测模型的外部有效性:来自 PROMISE 试验的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):437-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.02.020. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
3
High-Sensitivity Troponin I and Coronary Computed Tomography in Symptomatic Outpatients With Suspected CAD: Insights From the PROMISE Trial.高敏肌钙蛋白 I 与疑似 CAD 症状门诊患者的冠状动脉计算机断层扫描:来自 PROMISE 试验的新认识。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jun;12(6):1047-1055. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
4
Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on the Evaluation of Stable Chest Pain Patients: Insights From the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) Trial.糖尿病对稳定型胸痛患者评估的影响:来自 PROMISE(前瞻性多中心胸痛评估影像学研究)试验的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 31;6(11):e007019. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007019.
5
Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.通过非侵入性解剖和功能成像检测显著冠状动脉疾病。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;8(3). doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002179.
6
Comparison of different cardiac risk scores for coronary artery disease in symptomatic women: do female-specific risk factors matter?有症状女性冠状动脉疾病不同心脏风险评分的比较:女性特异性危险因素重要吗?
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1443-50. doi: 10.1177/2047487313494571. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
7
The Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS): Prognostic and Clinical Implications Associated With Standardized Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Reporting.冠状动脉疾病报告和数据系统(CAD-RADS):与标准化冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影报告相关的预后和临床意义。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jan;11(1):78-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.08.026.
8
Sex-Specific Associations Between Coronary Artery Plaque Extent and Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: The CONFIRM Long-Term Registry.冠状动脉斑块程度与主要不良心血管事件风险之间的性别特异性关联:CONFIRM长期注册研究
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;9(4):364-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.02.010.
9
A Comparison of the Updated Diamond-Forrester, CAD Consortium, and CONFIRM History-Based Risk Scores for Predicting Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Stable Chest Pain: The SCOT-HEART Coronary CTA Cohort.更新后的 Diamond-Forrester、CAD 联合会和 CONFIRM 基于病史的风险评分在预测稳定型胸痛患者中阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的比较:SCOT-HEART 冠状动脉 CTA 队列研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul;12(7 Pt 2):1392-1400. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.02.020. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
10
Sex differences in impact of coronary artery calcification to predict coronary artery disease.冠状动脉钙化对预测冠状动脉疾病的影响的性别差异。
Heart. 2018 Jul;104(13):1118-1124. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312151. Epub 2018 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Specificity and Areas of Usage of Cardiovascular Prediction Models Among Athletes-State-of-the-art Review.运动员心血管预测模型的特异性及应用领域——最新综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 16;26(5):37493. doi: 10.31083/RCM37493. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Two birds with one stone: pre-TAVI coronary CT angiography combined with FFR helps screen for coronary stenosis.一石二鸟:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)前的冠状动脉CT血管造影结合血流储备分数(FFR)有助于筛查冠状动脉狭窄。
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 May 26;25(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01704-2.
3
The Relationship between Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Parameters and Coronary Artery Disease Severity.

本文引用的文献

1
A calibration hierarchy for risk models was defined: from utopia to empirical data.定义了风险模型的校准层次结构:从理想状态到经验数据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:167-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.005. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
2
A clinical model to identify patients with high-risk coronary artery disease.一种用于识别高危冠状动脉疾病患者的临床模型。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Apr;8(4):427-434. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.11.015. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
3
CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial.
左心室舒张功能参数与冠状动脉疾病严重程度之间的关系
Iran J Med Sci. 2024 Dec 1;49(12):777-784. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2024.98344.3031. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Development and validation of a novel coronary artery disease risk prediction model.一种新型冠状动脉疾病风险预测模型的开发与验证
J Transl Med. 2025 Jan 10;23(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05789-1.
5
rs671 a/A Genotype is Associated with an Increased Risk of Early Onset Coronary Artery Stenosis.rs671 a/A基因型与早发性冠状动脉狭窄风险增加相关。
Int J Gen Med. 2024 May 24;17:2407-2415. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S461004. eCollection 2024.
6
Comparison of the RF-CL and CACS-CL models to estimate the pretest probability of obstructive coronary artery disease and predict prognosis in patients with stable chest pain and diabetes mellitus.比较射频计算机断层扫描(RF-CL)模型和冠状动脉钙化积分计算机断层扫描(CACS-CL)模型,以评估稳定型胸痛合并糖尿病患者的阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的预检概率并预测其预后。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 22;11:1368743. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1368743. eCollection 2024.
7
Impact of smoking in patients with suspected coronary artery disease in the randomised DISCHARGE trial.吸烟对疑似冠心病患者的影响:DISCHARGE 随机试验。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jun;34(6):4127-4141. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10355-2. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
8
Increasing frequency of dyspnea among patients referred for cardiac stress testing.接受心脏应激测试的患者呼吸困难的频率增加。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2023 Dec;30(6):2303-2313. doi: 10.1007/s12350-023-03375-4. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
9
Reframing the Paradigm for Assessing Optimal Test Selection When Suspecting Chronic Coronary Disease.重新构建疑似慢性冠状动脉疾病时评估最佳检查选择的范式。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Aug 15;12(16):e031027. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031027. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
10
The Role of Cardiac PET in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Ischemic Heart Disease: Optimal Modality Across Different Patient Populations.心脏 PET 在缺血性心脏病的诊断和预后中的作用:不同患者人群的最佳模态。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2023 Jul;25(7):351-357. doi: 10.1007/s11883-023-01107-0. Epub 2023 May 10.
疑似冠心病心绞痛患者的 CT 冠状动脉成像(SCOT-HEART):一项开放标签、平行组、多中心试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 13;385(9985):2383-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60291-4. Epub 2015 Mar 15.
4
Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.冠状动脉疾病解剖学检测与功能检测的结果
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1291-300. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415516. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
5
2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会心血管风险评估指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S49-73. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437741.48606.98. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
6
Temporal trends in the frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia during cardiac stress testing: 1991 to 2009.心脏负荷试验中可诱导性心肌缺血的频率的时间趋势:1991 年至 2009 年。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 12;61(10):1054-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.056.
7
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在三支病变合并左主干病变患者中的比较:随机、临床 SYNTAX 试验的 5 年随访结果。
Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):629-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60141-5.
8
Cardiovascular risk among stable individuals suspected of having coronary artery disease with no modifiable risk factors: results from an international multicenter study of 5262 patients.无可变风险因素的疑似冠心病稳定患者的心血管风险:来自 5262 例患者的国际多中心研究结果。
Radiology. 2013 Jun;267(3):718-26. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121669. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
9
Left main coronary atherosclerosis progression, constrictive remodeling, and clinical events.左主干冠状动脉粥样硬化进展、局限性重构和临床事件。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jan;6(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.09.006.
10
Risk stratification of patients suspected of coronary artery disease: comparison of five different models.疑似冠心病患者的风险分层:五种不同模型的比较。
Atherosclerosis. 2012 Feb;220(2):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.11.027. Epub 2011 Nov 25.