• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病对稳定型胸痛患者评估的影响:来自 PROMISE(前瞻性多中心胸痛评估影像学研究)试验的见解。

Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on the Evaluation of Stable Chest Pain Patients: Insights From the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) Trial.

机构信息

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 31;6(11):e007019. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007019.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.117.007019
PMID:29089344
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5721780/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of diabetes mellitus on the clinical presentation and noninvasive test (NIT) results among stable outpatients presenting with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been well described.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) trial enrolled 10 003 patients with known diabetic status, of whom 8966 were tested as randomized and had interpretable NIT results (1908 with diabetes mellitus, 21%). Differences in symptoms and NIT results were evaluated using logistic regression. Patients with diabetes mellitus (versus without) were similar in age (median 61 versus 60 years) and sex (female 54% versus 52%), had a greater burden of cardiovascular comorbidities, and had a similar likelihood of nonchest pain symptoms (29% versus 27%). The Diamond-Forrester/Coronary Artery Surgery Study score predicted that patients with diabetes mellitus (versus without) had similar likelihood of obstructive CAD (low 1.8% versus 2.7%; intermediate 92.3% versus 92.6%; high 5.9% versus 4.7%). Physicians estimated patients with diabetes mellitus to have a higher likelihood of obstructive CAD (low to very low: 28.3% versus 40.1%; intermediate 63.9% versus 55.9%; high to very high 7.8% versus 4.0%). Patients with diabetes mellitus (versus without) were more likely to have a positive NIT result (15% versus 11%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; =0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Stable chest pain patients with and without diabetes mellitus have similar presentation and pretest likelihood of obstructive CAD; however, physicians perceive that patients with diabetes mellitus have a higher pretest likelihood of obstructive CAD, an assessment supported by increased risk of a positive NIT. Further evaluation of diabetes mellitus's influence on CAD assessment is required.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01174550.

摘要

背景

糖尿病对稳定型门诊就诊患者临床表现和无创检查(NIT)结果的影响尚未得到充分描述,这些患者的症状提示患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)。

方法和结果

PROMISE(前瞻性多中心成像研究评估胸痛)试验纳入了 10003 名已知糖尿病患者,其中 8966 名患者按随机分组并进行了可解释的 NIT 检查(糖尿病患者 1908 例,占 21%)。使用逻辑回归评估症状和 NIT 结果的差异。与无糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者的年龄(中位数 61 岁比 60 岁)和性别(女性占 54%比 52%)相似,但心血管合并症负担更重,非胸痛症状的可能性也相似(29%比 27%)。Diamond-Forrester/Coronary Artery Surgery Study 评分预测,糖尿病患者(与无糖尿病患者相比)发生阻塞性 CAD 的可能性相似(低危 1.8%比 2.7%;中危 92.3%比 92.6%;高危 5.9%比 4.7%)。医生估计,糖尿病患者发生阻塞性 CAD 的可能性更高(低危到极低危 28.3%比 40.1%;中危 63.9%比 55.9%;高危到极高危 7.8%比 4.0%)。与无糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者的 NIT 检查结果阳性的可能性更高(15%比 11%;调整后的优势比,1.23;=0.01)。

结论

患有和不患有糖尿病的稳定型胸痛患者的临床表现和阻塞性 CAD 的术前可能性相似;然而,医生认为糖尿病患者发生阻塞性 CAD 的术前可能性更高,NIT 检查阳性的风险增加也支持了这一评估。需要进一步评估糖尿病对 CAD 评估的影响。

临床试验注册

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT01174550。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/395c/5721780/a60a3e217f50/JAH3-6-e007019-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/395c/5721780/97ecce029a48/JAH3-6-e007019-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/395c/5721780/a60a3e217f50/JAH3-6-e007019-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/395c/5721780/97ecce029a48/JAH3-6-e007019-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/395c/5721780/a60a3e217f50/JAH3-6-e007019-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on the Evaluation of Stable Chest Pain Patients: Insights From the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) Trial.糖尿病对稳定型胸痛患者评估的影响:来自 PROMISE(前瞻性多中心胸痛评估影像学研究)试验的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 31;6(11):e007019. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007019.
2
Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium in the PROMISE Study (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain).冠状动脉钙化在PROMISE研究(胸痛评估前瞻性多中心成像研究)中的预后价值
Circulation. 2017 Nov 21;136(21):1993-2005. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030578. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
3
Predictive Model for High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease.高危冠状动脉疾病预测模型。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;12(2):e007940. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007940.
4
Sex Differences in Demographics, Risk Factors, Presentation, and Noninvasive Testing in Stable Outpatients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the PROMISE Trial.疑似冠心病稳定门诊患者在人口统计学、危险因素、临床表现及无创检查方面的性别差异:来自PROMISE试验的见解
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;9(4):337-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.02.001.
5
Prognostic Value of Noninvasive Cardiovascular Testing in Patients With Stable Chest Pain: Insights From the PROMISE Trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain).稳定型胸痛患者无创心血管检查的预后价值:来自PROMISE试验(胸痛评估前瞻性多中心成像研究)的见解
Circulation. 2017 Jun 13;135(24):2320-2332. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024360. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
6
Stress Testing Versus CT Angiography in Patients With Diabetes and Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.糖尿病合并疑似冠心病患者的压力测试与 CT 血管造影比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Mar 5;73(8):893-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.056.
7
Pretest probability for patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease: re-evaluating Diamond-Forrester for the contemporary era and clinical implications: insights from the PROMISE trial.疑似阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者的术前概率:重新评估 Diamond-Forrester 在当代的适用性及临床意义:来自 PROMISE 试验的见解。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 May 1;20(5):574-581. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jey182.
8
The External Validity of Prediction Models for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Stable Chest Pain: Insights From the PROMISE Trial.稳定型胸痛患者阻塞性冠状动脉疾病诊断预测模型的外部有效性:来自 PROMISE 试验的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):437-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.02.020. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
9
Effects of obesity on noninvasive test results in patients with suspected cardiac ischemia: Insights from the PROMISE trial.肥胖对疑似缺血性心脏病患者无创检查结果的影响:来自 PROMISE 试验的见解。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Jul-Aug;13(4):211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
10
High-Sensitivity Troponin I and Coronary Computed Tomography in Symptomatic Outpatients With Suspected CAD: Insights From the PROMISE Trial.高敏肌钙蛋白 I 与疑似 CAD 症状门诊患者的冠状动脉计算机断层扫描:来自 PROMISE 试验的新认识。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jun;12(6):1047-1055. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Saudi Heart Association Guidelines on Best Practices in the Management of Chronic Coronary Syndromes.沙特心脏协会慢性冠状动脉综合征管理最佳实践指南。
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2022 Nov 18;34(3):182-211. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1320. eCollection 2022.
2
MiR-1290: a potential therapeutic target for regenerative medicine or diagnosis and treatment of non-malignant diseases.miR-1290:再生医学或非恶性疾病的诊断和治疗的潜在治疗靶点。
Clin Exp Med. 2023 Jul;23(3):737-750. doi: 10.1007/s10238-022-00854-9. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
3
Delays in Presentation by Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A single centre experience from Oman.

本文引用的文献

1
Atypical chest pain in diabetic patients with suspected stable angina: impact on diagnosis and coronary outcomes.疑似稳定型心绞痛的糖尿病患者的非典型胸痛:对诊断和冠状动脉结局的影响
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2015 Jul 1;1(1):37-43. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcv003.
2
Sex Differences in Functional and CT Angiography Testing in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.疑似冠状动脉疾病患者功能和CT血管造影检查中的性别差异
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jun 7;67(22):2607-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.523. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
3
Sex Differences in Demographics, Risk Factors, Presentation, and Noninvasive Testing in Stable Outpatients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the PROMISE Trial.
ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者就诊延误:来自阿曼的单中心经验。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2022 May;22(2):283-287. doi: 10.18295/squmj.4.2021.069. Epub 2022 May 26.
4
Comparison of Risk Assessment Strategies for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Stable Chest Pain: A Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Study.比较糖尿病伴稳定胸痛患者的风险评估策略:一项冠状动脉 CT 血管造影研究。
J Diabetes Res. 2022 Jan 25;2022:8183487. doi: 10.1155/2022/8183487. eCollection 2022.
5
Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Chinese mainland: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.中国大陆2型糖尿病患者骨质疏松症的患病率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(16):e19762. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019762.
6
Biospecimens and Molecular and Cellular Biomarkers in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Studies: Common Data Elements and Standard Reporting Recommendations.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血研究中的生物标本和分子与细胞生物标志物:常用数据元素和标准报告建议。
Neurocrit Care. 2019 Jun;30(Suppl 1):46-59. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00725-4.
7
Clinical significance of chronic myocardial ischemia in coronary artery disease patients.冠心病患者慢性心肌缺血的临床意义
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Mar;11(3):1005-1015. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.85.
8
Stress Testing Versus CT Angiography in Patients With Diabetes and Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.糖尿病合并疑似冠心病患者的压力测试与 CT 血管造影比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Mar 5;73(8):893-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.056.
疑似冠心病稳定门诊患者在人口统计学、危险因素、临床表现及无创检查方面的性别差异:来自PROMISE试验的见解
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;9(4):337-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.02.001.
4
Association of depression with pre-diabetes, undiagnosed diabetes, and previously diagnosed diabetes: a meta-analysis.抑郁症与糖尿病前期、未诊断糖尿病及既往诊断糖尿病的关联:一项荟萃分析。
Endocrine. 2016 Jul;53(1):35-46. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-0869-x. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
5
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2016年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2016 Jan 26;133(4):e38-360. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
6
Prediction of mortality by stress echocardiography in 2835 diabetic and 11 305 nondiabetic patients.2835 例糖尿病患者和 11305 例非糖尿病患者的超声心动图应激试验预测死亡率。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 May;8(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002757.
7
Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.冠状动脉疾病解剖学检测与功能检测的结果
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1291-300. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415516. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
8
Atypical presentation of acute and chronic coronary artery disease in diabetics.糖尿病患者急性和慢性冠状动脉疾病的非典型表现。
World J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 26;6(8):802-13. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i8.802.
9
PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of chest pain: rationale and design of the PROMISE trial.PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of chest pain:rationale and design of the PROMISE trial.
Am Heart J. 2014 Jun;167(6):796-803.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
10
2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会心血管风险评估指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2935-2959. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Nov 12.