Department of Livestock and Pasture Science, University of Fort Hare, P. Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa.
Döhne Agricultural Development Institute, Private Bag X15, Stutterheim, 4930, South Africa.
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2019 Apr;10(3):564-567. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
The southern cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, is an economically important tick that parasitises cattle and is found on other host species if they graze with cattle. The R. (B.) microplus is a highly adapted tick species prevalent in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. In Africa, it has expanded its range and was reported to supersede the native tick, R. (B.) decoloratus. The objective of the study was to determine the distribution of R. (B.) microplus under different ecological zones in the western-central regions of Eastern Cape Province. Engorged adult blue ticks were collected monthly from 360 randomly selected cattle and free living ticks from six replicate drags of the vegetation over a period of 1 year at Bedford Dry Grassland (BDG), Kowie Thicket (KT) and Bhisho Thornveld (BT). A special attention was paid to the lower perineum, neck, dewlap and ventral body parts which are the preferred sites for blue ticks during sampling. In this study, 9 species of ticks which grouped under 5 genera were identified. The identified species of ticks were Amblyomma hebraeum, Haemaphysalis elliptica, Hyalomma rufipes, Ixodes pilosus, R. (B.) decoloratus, R. appendiculatus, R. evertsi evertsi, R. follis and R. simus. Only adult R. (B.) decoloratus (n = 8090) ticks were collected from cattle between April 2016 and March 2017. A total of 4382 females and 3708 males of R. (B.) decoloratus were recovered during the survey. Of the ticks (n = 2885) collected from the vegetation, R. (B.) decoloratus was the most abundant species with a relative prevalence of 58.16%, followed by R. appendiculatus (18.37%) and R. evertsi evertsi (16.90%). Least abundant ticks were H. rufipes (2.98%), A. hebraeum (2.46%), H. elliptica (0.38%), R. follis (0.34%), I. pilosus (0.24%) and R. simus (0.17%). The distribution of R. (B.) decoloratus ticks differ significantly (P < 0.05) among the vegetation types. Significantly more (P < 0.05) engorged R. (B.) decoloratus were collected in KT during summer season (1.39 ± 0.063 females and 1.30 ± 0.063 males) compared to other vegetation types. The R. (B.) decoloratus larvae were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in BT (20.56±1.154) and KT (18.50±1.154) vegetation types during the spring season. R. (B.) microplus was not found in the present study, signifying that it is not yet established in western-central regions of the Eastern Cape Province and as such, continuous monitoring would be advisable.
南方牛蜱,即 Rhipicephalus(Boophilus)microplus,是一种经济上重要的寄生在牛身上的蜱虫,如果它们与牛一起放牧,也会寄生在其他宿主物种上。R.(B.)microplus 是一种高度适应的蜱种,广泛分布于世界热带和亚热带地区。在非洲,它的分布范围已经扩大,并被报道已经取代了本地的蜱种 R.(B.)decoloratus。本研究的目的是确定在东开普省中西部不同生态区 R.(B.)microplus 的分布情况。在为期 1 年的时间里,每月从 360 头随机选择的牛身上采集饱血的成年蓝蜱,并从植被的 6 个重复拖曳中采集自由生活的蜱虫。特别注意牛的下部会阴、颈部、垂皮和腹部等部位,这些部位是蓝蜱在采样期间的首选部位。在本研究中,共鉴定出 5 属 9 种蜱虫。鉴定出的蜱种包括 Amblyomma hebraeum、Haemaphysalis elliptica、Hyalomma rufipes、Ixodes pilosus、R.(B.)decoloratus、R. appendiculatus、R. evertsi evertsi、R. follis 和 R. simus。2016 年 4 月至 2017 年 3 月期间,仅从牛身上采集到成年 R.(B.)decoloratus(n=8090)。在调查期间共回收了 4382 只雌性和 3708 只雄性 R.(B.)decoloratus。从植被中采集的 2885 只蜱虫中,R.(B.)decoloratus 是最丰富的物种,相对流行率为 58.16%,其次是 R. appendiculatus(18.37%)和 R. evertsi evertsi(16.90%)。最不常见的蜱种是 H. rufipes(2.98%)、A. hebraeum(2.46%)、H. elliptica(0.38%)、R. follis(0.34%)、I. pilosus(0.24%)和 R. simus(0.17%)。R.(B.)decoloratus 蜱的分布在植被类型之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。与其他植被类型相比,KT 夏季采集到的饱血 R.(B.)decoloratus 雌蜱和雄蜱数量明显更多(P<0.05),分别为 1.39±0.063 和 1.30±0.063。BT(20.56±1.154)和 KT(18.50±1.154)植被类型中 R.(B.)decoloratus 幼虫数量在春季显著更高(P<0.05)。本研究中未发现 R.(B.)microplus,表明它尚未在东开普省中西部地区建立,因此建议进行持续监测。