Centre de Physiopathologie Toulouse Purpan, INSERM UMR 1043, Toulouse, France.
Centre de Rhumatologie, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Front Immunol. 2019 Jan 18;10:3. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00003. eCollection 2019.
Macrophages contribute to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). They can display different states of activation or "polarization," notably the so-called inflammatory "M1" and the various alternative "M2" polarizations, characterized by distinct functions. Data regarding the effects of RA anti-cytokine biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) on macrophage polarization are scarce. We aimed to assess modulation of macrophage polarization by bDMARDs targeting pro-inflammatory cytokines in RA. We generated monocyte derived macrophages using blood samples from 20 RA patients with active RA and 30 healthy controls. We evaluated the impact on M1 inflammatory macrophages of: etanercept (ETA), adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab (CZP), tocilizumab (TCZ), and rituximab (RTX). We assessed the impact on macrophage polarization using flow cytometry and RTqPCR to study the expression of surface markers and perform functional studies of cytokine production, phagocytosis, and negative feedback control of inflammation. Among evaluated bDMARDs, anti-TNF agents modulated the polarization of inflammatory macrophages by decreasing inflammatory surface markers (CD40, CD80) and favoring alternative markers (CD16, CD163, MerTK). Anti-TNF agents also induced alternative functions in macrophages activated in inflammatory condition with (i) the inhibition of inflammatory cytokines (TNF, IL-6, IL-12), (ii) an increase in phagocytosis. These findings were mechanistically related to an increase in early IL-10 production, responsible for higher negative feedback control of inflammation involving SOCS3 and Gas6. This IL-10 effect was STAT3-dependent. Anti-TNF agents not only inhibit inflammatory functions of macrophages, but also favor resolution of inflammation through polarization toward alternative features specifically involving the IL-10/STAT3 axis.
巨噬细胞参与类风湿关节炎 (RA) 的发病机制。它们可以表现出不同的激活状态或“极化”,特别是所谓的炎症“M1”和各种不同的替代“M2”极化,具有不同的功能。关于 RA 抗细胞因子生物改善病情抗风湿药物 (bDMARDs) 对巨噬细胞极化影响的数据很少。我们旨在评估针对促炎细胞因子的 bDMARD 对 RA 中巨噬细胞极化的调节作用。我们使用 20 名活动性 RA 患者和 30 名健康对照者的血液样本生成单核细胞来源的巨噬细胞。我们评估了以下 bDMARD 对 M1 炎症性巨噬细胞的影响:依那西普 (ETA)、阿达木单抗 (ADA)、赛妥珠单抗 (CZP)、托珠单抗 (TCZ) 和利妥昔单抗 (RTX)。我们使用流式细胞术和 RTqPCR 评估巨噬细胞极化的影响,以研究表面标志物的表达,并进行细胞因子产生、吞噬作用和炎症负反馈控制的功能研究。在评估的 bDMARD 中,抗 TNF 药物通过降低炎症表面标志物 (CD40、CD80) 和促进替代标志物 (CD16、CD163、MerTK) 来调节炎症性巨噬细胞的极化。抗 TNF 药物还在炎症条件下激活的巨噬细胞中诱导替代功能,包括:(i) 抑制炎症细胞因子 (TNF、IL-6、IL-12),(ii) 增加吞噬作用。这些发现与早期 IL-10 产生增加有关,这导致涉及 SOCS3 和 Gas6 的炎症负反馈控制更高。这种 IL-10 效应依赖于 STAT3。抗 TNF 药物不仅抑制巨噬细胞的炎症功能,还通过向替代特征极化来促进炎症的消退,特别是涉及 IL-10/STAT3 轴。