• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预备体重建对CAD/CAM陶瓷嵌体抗压强度的影响

Influence of Preparation Reconstruction on the Compressive Strength of CAD/CAM Ceramic Inlays.

作者信息

Salamoni Sinhori Bruna, Vieira Luiz Clovis Cardoso, Baratieri Luiz Narciso

机构信息

Professor Graduate Curses Operative Dentistry, University of Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil.

Professor, Undergraduate and Graduate Courses Operative Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Biomater. 2019 Jan 1;2019:7307649. doi: 10.1155/2019/7307649. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1155/2019/7307649
PMID:30713558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6333008/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the compressive strength of lithium dissilicate ceramic inlays is influenced by the substrate (dentin or composite resin build-up) and to compare it to nonrestored teeth. Thirty freshly extracted human maxillary third molars were selected and randomly ascribed to three groups (n=10). Standardized Class II MOD preparations were made (bucco-palatal width = 2/3 of the intercuspal width and 2/3 of the width at the tooth equator for the proximal boxes), varying the extension of the preparations (Group 2: preparation limited to tooth structure; Group 3: pulpal floor of the preparation rebuilt with composite resin, IPS Empress Direct, restored with lithium dissilicate CAD/CAM ceramic inlays (e.max CAD) and cemented with a resin cement (Variolink II)). All groups were subjected to compressive strength test (1mm/min crosshead speed). The results showed that the fracture strength of G1 (control group) was significantly higher than G2 and G3, while within these groups there were no statistically significant differences. Both groups restored with lithium dissilicate restorations did not reach the fracture strength of the sound teeth but were statistically equivalent and sufficient to withstand physiologic masticatory forces.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估二硅酸锂陶瓷嵌体的抗压强度是否受基底(牙本质或复合树脂堆塑)影响,并将其与未修复牙齿进行比较。选取30颗新鲜拔除的人类上颌第三磨牙,随机分为三组(n = 10)。制作标准化的II类MOD洞形(颊舌径 = 牙尖间宽度的2/3,近中盒在牙赤道处宽度的2/3),改变洞形的扩展范围(第2组:洞形局限于牙体结构;第3组:用复合树脂(IPS Empress Direct)重建洞形的髓室底,用二硅酸锂CAD/CAM陶瓷嵌体(e.max CAD)修复并用树脂水门汀(Variolink II)粘结)。所有组均进行抗压强度测试(十字头速度1mm/min)。结果显示,G1组(对照组)的断裂强度显著高于G2组和G3组,而这两组之间无统计学显著差异。两组用二硅酸锂修复体修复的牙齿均未达到完好牙齿的断裂强度,但在统计学上相当,足以承受生理咀嚼力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/954c/6333008/a0919caaaffc/IJBM2019-7307649.009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/954c/6333008/a0919caaaffc/IJBM2019-7307649.009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/954c/6333008/a0919caaaffc/IJBM2019-7307649.009.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of Preparation Reconstruction on the Compressive Strength of CAD/CAM Ceramic Inlays.预备体重建对CAD/CAM陶瓷嵌体抗压强度的影响
Int J Biomater. 2019 Jan 1;2019:7307649. doi: 10.1155/2019/7307649. eCollection 2019.
2
Microtensile bond strength of cad-cam and pressed-ceramic inlays to dentin.计算机辅助设计与计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)嵌体和压铸陶瓷嵌体与牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度
Eur J Dent. 2007 Apr;1(2):91-6.
3
Fracture resistance of teeth restored with all-ceramic inlays and onlays: an in vitro study.全瓷嵌体和高嵌体修复牙齿的抗折性:一项体外研究。
Oper Dent. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):626-34. doi: 10.2341/12-211-L. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
4
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.采用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)陶瓷嵌体修复的上颌前磨牙根管治疗后的抗折性能。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Oct;94(4):342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.004.
5
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.磨牙中复合树脂与陶瓷嵌体的强度和粘结力的三维有限元分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Feb;99(2):131-40. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60029-3.
6
Fracture resistance of prepared premolars restored with bonded new lab composite and all-ceramic inlay/onlay restorations: Laboratory study.用黏结型新型牙本质复合树脂和全瓷嵌体/高嵌体修复的预备前磨牙的抗折性能:实验室研究。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 May;30(3):229-239. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12364. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
7
Effect of immediate dentine sealing on the fracture strength of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite inlay restorations.即刻牙本质封闭对二硅酸锂和多相树脂复合体嵌体修复体断裂强度的影响。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Aug;72:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
8
Tensile bond strength and flexural modulus of resin cements--influence on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlays.树脂水门汀的拉伸粘结强度和弯曲模量——对陶瓷嵌体修复牙齿抗折性的影响
Oper Dent. 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):488-95. doi: 10.2341/06-140.
9
Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods.不同方法修复的经根管治疗的上颌前磨牙的抗折性能
Oper Dent. 2019 Jan/Feb;44(1):E1-E11. doi: 10.2341/17-262-L.
10
Optimization of large MOD restorations: Composite resin inlays vs. short fiber-reinforced direct restorations.大 MOD 修复体的优化:复合树脂嵌体与短纤维增强型直接修复体。
Dent Mater. 2018 Apr;34(4):587-597. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Ceramic Composition and Thickness on Light Transmission in CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Materials: An In Vitro Study.陶瓷成分和厚度对CAD/CAM二硅酸锂材料透光率的影响:一项体外研究
Int J Dent. 2025 Aug 31;2025:7488948. doi: 10.1155/ijod/7488948. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Restoring the Lost Functional Harmony in a Mutilated Dentition using Hobo's Twin Stage Concept of Full Mouth Rehabilitation.运用霍博全口修复双阶段理念恢复牙列缺损患者的功能协调性。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Sep;8(9):ZD21-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7982.4830. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
2
Comparative study of mechanical properties of dental restorative materials and dental hard tissues in compressive loads.牙科修复材料与牙体硬组织在压缩载荷下力学性能的比较研究
J Dent Biomech. 2014 Oct 11;5:1758736014555246. doi: 10.1177/1758736014555246. eCollection 2014.
3
The influence of elastic modulus of inlay materials on stress distribution and fracture of premolars.
嵌体材料弹性模量对前磨牙应力分布及骨折的影响。
Oper Dent. 2014 Jul-Aug;39(4):E160-70. doi: 10.2341/13-092-L.
4
Influence of surrounding wall thickness on the fatigue resistance of molars restored with ceramic inlay.牙釉质厚度对瓷嵌体修复磨牙疲劳性能的影响。
Braz Oral Res. 2014;28. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2014.vol28.0011. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
5
Ceramic inlays: is the inlay thickness an important factor influencing the fracture risk?陶瓷嵌体:嵌体厚度是否是影响折裂风险的重要因素?
J Dent. 2013 Jul;41(7):628-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.04.010. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
6
Evaluation of fracture resistance and failure risks of posterior partial coverage restorations.评估后牙部分覆盖修复体的抗折能力和失败风险。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013 Apr;25(2):110-22. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12018. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
7
Fracture resistance of teeth restored with all-ceramic inlays and onlays: an in vitro study.全瓷嵌体和高嵌体修复牙齿的抗折性:一项体外研究。
Oper Dent. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):626-34. doi: 10.2341/12-211-L. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
8
Effect of loading on the microtensile bond strength and microleakage of a self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive in direct Class II MOD composite restorations in vitro.体外研究负载对自酸蚀和酸蚀-冲洗型黏结剂用于直接Ⅱ类 MOD 复合树脂修复体微拉伸黏结强度和微渗漏的影响。
Dent Mater J. 2012;31(6):924-32. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2012-048.
9
Functional and aesthetic guidelines for stress-reduced direct posterior composite restorations.降低应力的直接后牙复合树脂修复的功能和美学指南。
Oper Dent. 2012 Jul-Aug;37(4):425-31. doi: 10.2341/11-082-T.
10
Repair or replacement of defective restorations by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.由口腔实践研究网络中的牙医进行有缺陷修复体的修复或更换。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Jun;143(6):593-601. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0238.