Suppr超能文献

观看距离和视角对 2014 年国际足联世界杯裁判决策表现的影响。

The role of viewing distance and viewing angle on referees' decision-making performance during the FIFA World Cup 2014.

机构信息

a Institute of Sport Science , University of Bern , Bern , Switzerland.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2019 Jul;37(13):1481-1489. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1570898. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

Abstract

The present study aims to reveal the effects of positioning on decision-making performance in top-level refereeing in association football. To this end, for all 64 matches of the FIFA World Cup 2014, potential foul-play situations were videometrically analysed in terms of the referee's position relative to the infringement. Contrary to earlier studies, viewing angles were analysed in addition to viewing distances and error rates were considered for not only falsely whistled but also falsely non-whistled events. Moreover, direct logistic regression analysis was applied to detect position-dependent differences. For the total of 1,527 potential foul play situations, an overall low error rate of 6.9% was found. The similar numbers of total whistle ( = 52) and non-whistle errors ( = 54) reflect referees' ability to balance both types of errors. Regarding the overall viewing-distance effect, referees were 2.58 times (95% CI 1.47-4.54) more likely to commit a whistle error at 10-15 m and 5.51 times (95% CI 1.35-22.47) more likely to commit a non-whistle error at 0-5 m, corresponding to the position ranges occurring with the highest (10-15 m: 30.3%) and lowest (0-5 m: 5.8%) frequencies. In contrast, no significant effects of viewing-angle on decision-making accuracy could be revealed.

摘要

本研究旨在揭示定位对足球顶级裁判决策表现的影响。为此,针对 2014 年国际足联世界杯的所有 64 场比赛,我们从裁判员相对于犯规的位置角度,对潜在的犯规情况进行了视频计量分析。与早期研究不同,我们不仅分析了观察距离,还分析了观察角度,并且不仅考虑了错误吹罚的情况,还考虑了错误不吹罚的情况,计算了错误率。此外,我们还应用了直接逻辑回归分析来检测与位置相关的差异。在总共 1527 个潜在的犯规情况下,我们发现整体错误率仅为 6.9%。总的吹罚(=52)和非吹罚错误(=54)的数量相似,这反映了裁判员平衡这两种错误的能力。关于整体观察距离的影响,裁判员在 10-15 米处错误吹罚的可能性是在 0-5 米处的 2.58 倍(95%置信区间 1.47-4.54),在 0-5 米处错误不吹罚的可能性是在 10-15 米处的 5.51 倍(95%置信区间 1.35-22.47),这与发生频率最高(10-15 米:30.3%)和最低(0-5 米:5.8%)的位置范围相对应。相比之下,观察角度对决策准确性没有显著影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验