Riiser Amund, Andersen Vidar, Sæterbakken Atle, Ylvisaker Einar, Moe Vegard Fusche
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Campus Sogndal, Norway.
Sports Med Int Open. 2019 Aug 16;3(2):E66-E71. doi: 10.1055/a-0958-8608. eCollection 2019 Apr.
We aimed to assess if running performance is related to decision-making accuracy in referees. We also investigated the relationships between movement, position, decision-making and time of infringement. The study included 347 free kicks and penalties awarded during all 15 home field matches for one team in the Norwegian top league. Movement and position were measured by a radio-based positioning system, and two external experts analysed the video clips. The referees made the correct decision in 98% of the assessed foul situations. There were no associations between the correctness and running speed at the time of the infringements or total distance accumulated during the 30 s prior to the infringement (p>0.08). Decision-making accuracy was not associated with the referees' position in relation to the infringements (p=0.82) or the area where the infringements occurred (p=0.28). Most foul play incidents were sanctioned in the central area of the field (84%) where the distance to the infringements was shorter (13.4 m, 95% CI 12.8-14.0) than in the lateral areas (21.9 m, 95% CI 20.4-23.4). Norwegian top referees were practically always right when they interfered, possess the necessary fitness to avoid fatigue that would influence decision-making accuracy, and maintain adequate positional ability throughout the matches.
我们旨在评估跑步表现是否与裁判的决策准确性相关。我们还研究了动作、位置、决策与犯规时间之间的关系。该研究涵盖了挪威顶级联赛中一支球队在所有15场主场比赛中判给的347次任意球和点球。通过基于无线电的定位系统测量动作和位置,由两名外部专家分析视频片段。在评估的犯规情况中,裁判做出正确判罚的比例为98%。在犯规时的跑步速度或犯规前30秒内累计的总距离与判罚正确性之间没有关联(p>0.08)。决策准确性与裁判相对于犯规的位置(p=0.82)或犯规发生的区域(p=0.28)无关。大多数犯规事件在球场中央区域被处罚(84%),该区域到犯规地点的距离(13.4米,95%置信区间12.8 - 14.0)比在侧边区域(21.9米,95%置信区间20.4 - 23.4)短。挪威顶级裁判在进行判罚时几乎总是正确的,具备必要的体能以避免疲劳影响决策准确性,并且在整场比赛中保持足够的位置判断能力。