Johansen Bjørn Tore, Erikstad Martin Kjeøen
Department of Sport Science and Physical Education, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Jan 8;2:595703. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.595703. eCollection 2020.
Soccer referees move freely on the pitch to place themselves in the best location for making decisions. While Football Association UK (FA) highlights that a referee should never be more than 20 m away from the playing situation, previous studies have been inconsistent in indicating appropriate distance to a situation for increasing the likelihood of a correct decision. Further, appropriate angle and insight are also likely to influence the correctness of referees' decisions. The aim of this study was to provide an initial investigation of elite referees' positioning in the field (distance, angle, and insight) when making correct and erroneous decisions in potential penalty situations. An expert panel (EP) consisting of two active referees with relevant academic background analyzed referees positioning when making correct or erroneous decisions regarding penalties. The EP were asked to qualitatively analyze referees positioning in selected video clips by using recommended technical refereeing criteria and practical guidelines (i.e., the referee's distance from, angle to, and insight into the penalty situations). Of the 42 situations evaluated, the results revealed that the EP termed the referees positioning as good in terms of angle and insight in 25 and 21 situations, respectively. The angle was average in seven situations and poor in 10 situations, and the insight were average in 10 situations and poor in 11 situations. The match referee was <10 meters away in 12 situations, 10-20 m away in 22 situations, and >20 meters away in eight situations. Results revealed that referees' positioning that resulted in the highest rate of correct decisions were when the distance were under 10 meters (83% correct decisions), good angle (88%), and good insight (86%). In contrast, referees were poorly positioned in terms of angle and/or insight in nine of the 15 erroneous decisions made. Although the present study was a preliminary qualitative investigation containing a limited number of potential penalty situations, the findings indicated that soccer referees are more likely to produce a correct decision in potential penalty situations when the distance to the situation is under 10 meters, when the insight to the situation is good and the angle to the incident is good. In contrast, the match referees generally had a poor starting position to assess the penalty situations where they landed on a wrong decision. While previous studies have been somewhat inconsistent in indicating optimal referee positioning in soccer, the present study highlights the potential value of a more qualitative approach to understand referees' positioning and subsequent decision-making accuracy.
足球裁判在球场上自由移动,以便站在最佳位置做出判罚。虽然英国足球协会(FA)强调裁判与比赛场景的距离不应超过20米,但先前的研究在确定能提高正确判罚可能性的合适距离方面并不一致。此外,合适的角度和视野也可能影响裁判判罚的正确性。本研究的目的是初步调查精英裁判在潜在点球判罚情况下做出正确和错误判罚时在球场上的站位(距离、角度和视野)。一个由两名具有相关学术背景的现役裁判组成的专家小组(EP)分析了裁判在做出关于点球的正确或错误判罚时的站位情况。要求专家小组根据推荐的裁判技术标准和实践指南(即裁判与点球情况的距离、角度和视野)对选定视频片段中裁判的站位进行定性分析。在评估的42个场景中,结果显示,专家小组分别认为裁判在25个和21个场景中的角度和视野方面的站位良好。角度在7个场景中为中等,在10个场景中较差;视野在10个场景中为中等,在11个场景中较差。比赛裁判在12个场景中距离小于10米,在22个场景中距离为10 - 20米,在8个场景中距离大于20米。结果显示,导致正确判罚率最高的裁判站位情况是距离在10米以内(正确判罚率83%)、角度良好(88%)和视野良好(86%)。相比之下,在做出的15个错误判罚中,有9个在角度和/或视野方面站位不佳。尽管本研究是一项初步的定性调查,包含的潜在点球判罚情况数量有限,但研究结果表明,当与判罚场景的距离在10米以内、对场景的视野良好且对事件的角度良好时,足球裁判在潜在点球判罚情况下更有可能做出正确判罚。相比之下,比赛裁判在评估导致他们做出错误判罚的点球情况时,起始位置通常不佳。虽然先前的研究在指出足球裁判的最佳站位方面有些不一致,但本研究强调了采用更定性的方法来理解裁判站位和后续判罚准确性的潜在价值。