Suppr超能文献

血红蛋白A1c在乌干达有和没有感染艾滋病毒人群中用于诊断糖尿病的有效性。

Validity of hemoglobin A1c for diagnosing diabetes among people with and without HIV in Uganda.

作者信息

Muchira James, Stuart-Shor Eileen, Manne-Goehler Jen, Lo Janet, Tsai Alexander C, Kakukire Bernard, Okello Samson, Siedner Mark J

机构信息

1 University of Massachusetts Boston, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA.

2 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Int J STD AIDS. 2019 Apr;30(5):479-485. doi: 10.1177/0956462418823406. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

Abstract

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is facing a growing co-epidemic of chronic HIV infection and diabetes. Hemoglobin A1c (A1c) may underestimate glycemia among people living with HIV (PLWH). We estimated the validity of A1c to diagnose diabetes among PLWH and HIV-uninfected persons in rural Uganda. Data were derived from a cohort of PLWH and age- and gender-matched HIV-uninfected comparators. We compared A1c to fasting blood glucose (FBG) using Pearson correlations, regression models, and estimated the sensitivity and specificity of A1c for detecting diabetes with FBG ≥126 mg/dL as reference standard. Approximately half (48%) of the 212 participants were female, mean age of 51.7 years (SD = 7.0) at enrollment. All PLWH (n = 118) were on antiretroviral therapy for a median of 7.5 years with mean CD4 cell count of 442 cells/µL. Mean FBG (89.7 mg/dL) and A1c (5.6%) were not different between PLWH and HIV-uninfected ( P > 0.50) groups, but the HIV-uninfected group had a higher prevalence of A1c >5.7% (33% vs. 20%, P = 0.024). We found a relatively strong correlation between A1c and FBG (r = 0.67). An A1c ≥6.5% had a poor sensitivity (46%, 95% CI 26-67%) but high specificity (98%, 95% CI 96-99%) for detecting diabetes. More work is needed to define an optimal A1c for screening diabetes in SSA.

摘要

撒哈拉以南非洲地区(SSA)正面临着慢性艾滋病毒感染和糖尿病这两种流行病日益增长的共同影响。糖化血红蛋白(A1c)可能会低估艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)的血糖水平。我们评估了A1c在乌干达农村地区的艾滋病毒感染者和未感染艾滋病毒者中诊断糖尿病的有效性。数据来自一组艾滋病毒感染者以及年龄和性别匹配的未感染艾滋病毒的对照者。我们使用Pearson相关性、回归模型将A1c与空腹血糖(FBG)进行比较,并以FBG≥126mg/dL作为参考标准估计A1c检测糖尿病的敏感性和特异性。212名参与者中约一半(48%)为女性,入组时的平均年龄为51.7岁(标准差=7.0)。所有艾滋病毒感染者(n=118)均接受抗逆转录病毒治疗,治疗时间中位数为7.5年,平均CD4细胞计数为442个/微升。艾滋病毒感染者和未感染艾滋病毒者之间的平均空腹血糖(89.7mg/dL)和A1c(5.6%)没有差异(P>0.50),但未感染艾滋病毒组中A1c>5.7%的患病率更高(33%对20%,P=0.024)。我们发现A1c与FBG之间存在相对较强的相关性(r=0.67)。A1c≥6.5%在检测糖尿病时敏感性较差(46%,95%CI 26-67%)但特异性较高(98%,95%CI 96-99%)。需要开展更多工作来确定撒哈拉以南非洲地区筛查糖尿病的最佳A1c水平。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: .2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断: 。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S13-S27. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S002.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验