Kim So-Young, Friedmann Patricia, Seth Amit, Fleckman Adrienne M
Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Office of Grants and Research Administration, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2014 Dec 4;7:41-5. doi: 10.4137/CMED.S19202. eCollection 2014.
Published studies report inappropriately low hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) values that underestimate glycemia in HIV patients.
We reviewed the charts of all HIV patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) at our clinic. Fifty-nine patients had HbA1c data, of whom 26 patients also had fructosamine data. We compared the most recent HbA1c to finger-stick (FS) glucose averaged over three months, and fructosamine to FS averaged over six weeks. Predicted average glucose (pAG) was calculated as reported by Nathan et al: pAG (mg/dL) = 28.7 × A1C% - 46.7. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) and Kruskal-Wallis test.
HbA1c values underestimated (UE) actual average glucose (aAG) in 19% of these patients and overestimated (OE) aAG in 27%. HbA1c estimated aAG within the established range in only 54% of the patients. There were no statistical differences in the types of HIV medication used in patients with UE, OE, or accurately estimated (AE) glycemia. A Spearman correlation coefficient between HbA1c and aAG was r = 0.53 (P < 0.0001). Correlation between fructosamine and aAG was r = 0.47 (P = 0.016).
The correlations between HbA1c and aAG and between fructosamine and aAG were weaker than expected, and fructosamine was not more accurate than HbA1c.
已发表的研究报告称,血红蛋白A1C(HbA1c)值存在不恰当的偏低情况,从而低估了HIV患者的血糖水平。
我们查阅了本诊所所有患有糖尿病(DM)的HIV患者的病历。59名患者有HbA1c数据,其中26名患者也有果糖胺数据。我们将最近的HbA1c与三个月内的指尖血糖(FS)平均值进行比较,并将果糖胺与六周内的FS平均值进行比较。预测平均血糖(pAG)按照内森等人的报告进行计算:pAG(mg/dL)= 28.7 × A1C% - 46.7。使用统计分析系统(SAS)和克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验对数据进行分析。
在这些患者中,19%的患者HbA1c值低估(UE)了实际平均血糖(aAG),27%的患者高估(OE)了aAG。HbA1c仅在54%的患者中将aAG估计在既定范围内。在HbA1c值低估、高估或准确估计(AE)血糖水平的患者中,所使用的HIV药物类型没有统计学差异。HbA1c与aAG之间的斯皮尔曼相关系数为r = 0.53(P < 0.0001)。果糖胺与aAG之间的相关性为r = 0.47(P = 0.016)。
HbA1c与aAG之间以及果糖胺与aAG之间的相关性比预期的要弱,并且果糖胺并不比HbA1c更准确。