College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Jefo Nutrition Inc., Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec J2S 7B6, Canada.
Poult Sci. 2019 Jul 1;98(7):2858-2865. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez031.
The aim of this study was to evaluate a combination diet of organic acids and essential oils on epithelial restitution, intestinal microflora, and volatile fatty acids in broiler chickens. A total of 144 1-day-old male chicks (Cobb 500) were allotted to 3 treatment groups consisting of 6 replicates with 8 birds per replicate. The dietary treatments were as follows: control group (CON, basal diet), antibiotics group (ANT, control + 0.15 g/kg enramycin), and addition group (EOA, control + 0.30 g/kg encapsulated organic acids and essential oils). Compared to the CON group, the EOA group showed a higher feed conversion ratio (FCR) (P < 0.05) at day 42. The ANT group showed the lowest count of Lactobacillus spp. (P < 0.05) and the highest count of Escherichia coli (P < 0.05) in the ileal digesta. Birds that were fed the EOA-supplemented diet had decreased populations of E. coli (P < 0.05). Compared with the ANT group, supplementation with EOA tended to reduce the pH of jejunal digesta (P = 0.079) and ileal digesta (P = 0.078) but significantly increased the concentration of butyric acid (P < 0.05) and tended to increase the concentrations of acetic acid (P = 0.087) and total short-chain fatty acids (SCFA; P = 0.098) in the ileal digesta. The EOA group showed higher sucrase and maltase activities of jejunal mucosa (P < 0.05) than those in the other groups. The EOA supplementation increased (P < 0.05) claudin-1 mRNA expression in the jejunum. Compared with the other groups, enramycin supplementation significantly reduced jejunal mucosa sIgA (P < 0.05) and down-regulated Mucin-2 and TLR2 mRNA relative expression (P < 0.05) in the jejunal mucosa of broiler chickens. Both EOA and enramycin contribute beneficially to FCR because of their antimicrobial action. EOA may reduce harmful bacteria and promote digestive enzyme activity and higher concentrations of SCFA. In contrast, enramycin may inhibit the growth of beneficial bacteria and reduce the need for intestinal mucosal barrier function.
本研究旨在评估有机酸和精油组合饲料对肉鸡上皮修复、肠道微生物群和挥发性脂肪酸的影响。将 144 只 1 日龄雄性小鸡(Cobb 500)分为 3 个处理组,每组 6 个重复,每个重复 8 只。日粮处理如下:对照组(CON,基础日粮)、抗生素组(ANT,CON+0.15g/kg 恩拉霉素)和添加组(EOA,CON+0.30g/kg 包被的有机酸和精油)。与 CON 组相比,EOA 组在第 42 天的饲料转化率(FCR)更高(P<0.05)。ANT 组回肠内容物中乳酸菌属数量最低(P<0.05),大肠杆菌数量最高(P<0.05)。饲喂添加 EOA 的日粮的鸡大肠杆菌数量减少(P<0.05)。与 ANT 组相比,添加 EOA tended 降低了空肠内容物(P=0.079)和回肠内容物(P=0.078)的 pH 值,但显著增加了丁酸浓度(P<0.05),并 tended 增加了乙酸浓度(P=0.087)和回肠内容物中总短链脂肪酸(SCFA;P=0.098)的浓度。EOA 组空肠黏膜蔗糖酶和麦芽糖酶活性高于其他组(P<0.05)。EOA 补充剂增加了空肠中 Claudin-1 mRNA 的表达(P<0.05)。与其他组相比,恩拉霉素显著降低了空肠黏膜 sIgA(P<0.05),下调了空肠黏膜 Mucin-2 和 TLR2 mRNA 的相对表达(P<0.05)。有机酸和恩拉霉素都通过其抗菌作用有益于 FCR。EOA 可以减少有害细菌,促进消化酶活性和更高浓度的 SCFA。相比之下,恩拉霉素可能会抑制有益细菌的生长,减少对肠道黏膜屏障功能的需求。