Suppr超能文献

老年人糖尿病患者的食物不安全感与急诊就诊、住院、糖化血红蛋白和药物依从性之间的纵向关系。

The longitudinal relationship between food insecurity in older adults with diabetes and emergency department visits, hospitalizations, hemoglobin A1c, and medication adherence.

机构信息

Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States; Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.

Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.

出版信息

J Diabetes Complications. 2019 Apr;33(4):289-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Dec 6.

Abstract

AIMS

To examine the relationship between food insecurity and emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, A1c, and diabetes medication adherence over one year of follow-up among individuals >65 years with diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal cohort study of adults >65 years with diabetes who did (n = 742) or did not (n = 2226) report food insecurity at baseline. We used conditional logistic regression for the ED visits or hospitalization outcomes, and mixed effects models for A1c and non-insulin diabetes medication adherence.

RESULTS

In bivariate analyses, individuals with food insecurity were more likely to have an ED visit (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.15-1.72) or hospitalization (OR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.11-1.78) in the year after the food security assessment. In addition, A1c was higher (7.5% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in medication adherence. These differences persisted with adjustment for basic demographic and clinical characteristics, but were attenuated with further adjustment for socioeconomic status.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in diabetes outcomes by food insecurity status were attenuated by adjustment for socioeconomic status. Adverse outcomes in individuals with diabetes and food insecurity may be driven by effects of food insecurity per se or be mediated by a constellation of basic resource needs or lower socioeconomic status.

摘要

目的

在超过 65 岁的糖尿病患者中,在为期一年的随访期间,研究食物不安全与急症室(ED)就诊、住院、A1c 和糖尿病药物治疗依从性之间的关系。

方法

我们对患有糖尿病且在基线时报告有(n=742)或没有(n=2226)食物不安全的 65 岁以上成年人进行了一项纵向队列研究。我们使用条件逻辑回归分析 ED 就诊或住院结局,使用混合效应模型分析 A1c 和非胰岛素糖尿病药物治疗依从性。

结果

在单变量分析中,与食物安全的个体相比,在进行食物安全评估后的一年内,有食物不安全的个体更有可能去急症室就诊(OR=1.40,95%CI 1.15-1.72)或住院(OR=1.41,95%CI 1.11-1.78)。此外,A1c 更高(7.5%比 7.2%,p<0.001)。药物治疗依从性没有差异。这些差异在调整了基本人口统计学和临床特征后仍然存在,但在进一步调整了社会经济地位后有所减弱。

结论

通过调整社会经济地位,食物不安全状态与糖尿病结局的差异减弱。糖尿病和食物不安全个体的不良结局可能是由食物不安全本身的影响驱动的,也可能是由一系列基本资源需求或较低的社会经济地位介导的。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
The Effectiveness of Food Insecurity Screening in Pediatric Primary Care.儿科初级保健中粮食不安全筛查的有效性
Int J Child Health Nutr. 2014;3(3):130-138. doi: 10.6000/1929-4247.2014.03.03.3. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验