College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ.
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;31:62-68.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
We evaluated the validity and sensitivity to change of a workplace questionnaire to assess sedentary behavior (SB) during and outside work.
Participants wore an activPAL and completed an SB questionnaire at two time points (baseline and 3-month follow-up). Ecological momentary assessments were used to assess workplace location (at desk vs. away from desk). Intraclass correlation coefficients, mean difference, root of mean square error, kappa agreement, and Bland-Altman plots assessed validity. Sensitivity to change after 3 months of intervention was assessed using the standardized effect size.
Data from 546 participants (age = 45.1 ± 16.4 years, 24.9% males, 72.7% white) were analyzed. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.08 to 0.23. SB was overestimated d¯(95%CI)[] by 47.9 (39.2, 56.6) min during work hours but underestimated for both non-work hours and nonworkdays by -38.3 (-47.4, 29.1) and -106.7 (124.0, -89.5) min, respectively. Participants slightly underestimated SB by -3.4 (-12.6, 5.7)% when at their desk but overestimated SB by 2.8 (-2.4, 8.0)% when not at their desk. The questionnaire demonstrated similar standardized effect size (>0.6) to the activPAL for sedentary and standing time.
Agreement between the questionnaire and activPAL was on par with other self-report measures. The questionnaire yielded valid estimates of at/away from desk SB and was sensitive to change.
我们评估了一种用于评估工作时和工作外久坐行为(SB)的工作场所问卷的有效性和对变化的敏感性。
参与者佩戴 activPAL 并在两个时间点(基线和 3 个月随访)完成 SB 问卷。生态瞬时评估用于评估工作场所位置(在办公桌前与远离办公桌)。组内相关系数、均值差、均方根误差、kappa 一致性和 Bland-Altman 图评估了有效性。使用标准化效应大小评估 3 个月干预后的变化敏感性。
对 546 名参与者(年龄=45.1±16.4 岁,24.9%为男性,72.7%为白人)的数据进行了分析。组内相关系数范围为 0.08 至 0.23。工作时间内 SB 被高估了 d¯(95%CI)[],为 47.9(39.2, 56.6) min,但非工作时间和非工作日的低估值分别为-38.3(-47.4, 29.1)和-106.7(124.0, -89.5) min。当参与者在办公桌前时,他们低估了 SB 约-3.4(-12.6, 5.7)%,而当不在办公桌前时,他们高估了 SB 约 2.8(-2.4, 8.0)%。该问卷对久坐和站立时间的标准化效应大小(>0.6)与 activPAL 相似。
问卷与 activPAL 的一致性与其他自我报告措施相当。该问卷得出的在/远离办公桌 SB 的有效估计值具有变化敏感性。