Suppr超能文献

工作中站立和移动行为问卷:有效性和变化敏感性。

Stand and Move at Work sedentary behavior questionnaire: validity and sensitivity to change.

机构信息

College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ.

Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;31:62-68.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We evaluated the validity and sensitivity to change of a workplace questionnaire to assess sedentary behavior (SB) during and outside work.

METHODS

Participants wore an activPAL and completed an SB questionnaire at two time points (baseline and 3-month follow-up). Ecological momentary assessments were used to assess workplace location (at desk vs. away from desk). Intraclass correlation coefficients, mean difference, root of mean square error, kappa agreement, and Bland-Altman plots assessed validity. Sensitivity to change after 3 months of intervention was assessed using the standardized effect size.

RESULTS

Data from 546 participants (age = 45.1 ± 16.4 years, 24.9% males, 72.7% white) were analyzed. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.08 to 0.23. SB was overestimated d¯(95%CI)[] by 47.9 (39.2, 56.6) min during work hours but underestimated for both non-work hours and nonworkdays by -38.3 (-47.4, 29.1) and -106.7 (124.0, -89.5) min, respectively. Participants slightly underestimated SB by -3.4 (-12.6, 5.7)% when at their desk but overestimated SB by 2.8 (-2.4, 8.0)% when not at their desk. The questionnaire demonstrated similar standardized effect size (>0.6) to the activPAL for sedentary and standing time.

CONCLUSIONS

Agreement between the questionnaire and activPAL was on par with other self-report measures. The questionnaire yielded valid estimates of at/away from desk SB and was sensitive to change.

摘要

目的

我们评估了一种用于评估工作时和工作外久坐行为(SB)的工作场所问卷的有效性和对变化的敏感性。

方法

参与者佩戴 activPAL 并在两个时间点(基线和 3 个月随访)完成 SB 问卷。生态瞬时评估用于评估工作场所位置(在办公桌前与远离办公桌)。组内相关系数、均值差、均方根误差、kappa 一致性和 Bland-Altman 图评估了有效性。使用标准化效应大小评估 3 个月干预后的变化敏感性。

结果

对 546 名参与者(年龄=45.1±16.4 岁,24.9%为男性,72.7%为白人)的数据进行了分析。组内相关系数范围为 0.08 至 0.23。工作时间内 SB 被高估了 d¯(95%CI)[],为 47.9(39.2, 56.6) min,但非工作时间和非工作日的低估值分别为-38.3(-47.4, 29.1)和-106.7(124.0, -89.5) min。当参与者在办公桌前时,他们低估了 SB 约-3.4(-12.6, 5.7)%,而当不在办公桌前时,他们高估了 SB 约 2.8(-2.4, 8.0)%。该问卷对久坐和站立时间的标准化效应大小(>0.6)与 activPAL 相似。

结论

问卷与 activPAL 的一致性与其他自我报告措施相当。该问卷得出的在/远离办公桌 SB 的有效估计值具有变化敏感性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 26;1:CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验