Discipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Medical Image Optimisation and Perception Group (MIOPeG), The University of Sydney, 512/Block M, Cumberland Campus, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Carver College of Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
J Digit Imaging. 2019 Oct;32(5):702-712. doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00181-8.
Inter-pathologist agreement for nuclear atypia scoring of breast cancer is poor. To address this problem, previous studies suggested some criteria for describing the variations appearance of tumor cells relative to normal cells. However, these criteria were still assessed subjectively by pathologists. Previous studies used quantitative computer-extracted features for scoring. However, application of these tools is limited as further improvement in their accuracy is required. This study proposes COMPASS (COMputer-assisted analysis combined with Pathologist's ASSessment) for reproducible nuclear atypia scoring. COMPASS relies on both cytological criteria assessed subjectively by pathologists as well as computer-extracted textural features. Using machine learning, COMPASS combines these two sets of features and output nuclear atypia score. COMPASS's performance was evaluated using 300 images for which expert-consensus derived reference nuclear pleomorphism scores were available, and they were scanned by two scanners from different vendors. A personalized model was built for three pathologists who gave scores to six atypia-related criteria for each image. Leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV) was used. COMPASS was trained and tested for each pathologist separately. Percentage agreement between COMPASS and the reference nuclear scores was 93.8%, 92.9%, and 93.1% for three pathologists. COMPASS's performance in nuclear grading was almost identical for both scanners, with Cohen's kappa ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 for different pathologists and different scanners. Independently, the images were also assessed by two experienced senior pathologists. Cohen's kappa of COMPASS was comparable to the Cohen's kappa for two senior pathologists (0.79 and 0.68).
乳腺癌核异型性评分的病理学家间一致性较差。为了解决这个问题,之前的研究提出了一些描述肿瘤细胞相对于正常细胞变异外观的标准。然而,这些标准仍然由病理学家进行主观评估。之前的研究使用定量的计算机提取特征进行评分。然而,由于需要进一步提高这些工具的准确性,因此它们的应用受到限制。本研究提出了 COMPASS(计算机辅助分析与病理学家评估相结合),用于可重复的核异型性评分。COMPASS 依赖于病理学家主观评估的细胞学标准以及计算机提取的纹理特征。使用机器学习,COMPASS 结合了这两组特征,并输出核异型性评分。使用 300 张图像评估了 COMPASS 的性能,这些图像具有专家共识得出的参考核多形性评分,并且由来自不同供应商的两台扫描仪进行了扫描。为三位病理学家分别建立了个性化模型,每位病理学家对每张图像的六个异型性相关标准进行评分。采用留一法交叉验证(LOOCV)。为每位病理学家分别对 COMPASS 进行训练和测试。COMPASS 与参考核评分的百分比一致性分别为 93.8%、92.9%和 93.1%,三位病理学家的一致性都很高。COMPASS 在核分级方面的性能在两台扫描仪上几乎相同,不同病理学家和不同扫描仪的 Cohen's kappa 值范围为 0.80 至 0.86。独立地,这些图像也由两位经验丰富的高级病理学家进行了评估。COMPASS 的 Cohen's kappa 值与两位高级病理学家的 Cohen's kappa 值相当(0.79 和 0.68)。