Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Clinical Center of the University of Pécs, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Nutr Rev. 2019 May 1;77(5):278-306. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuy063.
Various epidemiological studies suggest a positive association between exposure to cow's milk A1 β-casein protein and risk for noncommunicable chronic diseases. The consumption of A2 cow's milk is increasing, likely because A2 milk is postulated to have positive effects on digestive health.
A systematic review was conducted to investigate associations between A1 β-casein and health-related outcomes in humans.
Five electronic databases, 3 clinical trial registries, and the internet were searched systematically.
Using predefined inclusion criteria, 2 authors independently selected studies investigating the effect of A1 β-casein or β-casomorphin-7 intake/exposure on any health-related outcome in humans. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.
Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. The certainty of evidence per outcome was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.
Fifteen randomized controlled trials, 2 case-control studies, and 8 ecological studies were included. Most randomized controlled studies and case-control studies investigating a potential effect on various outcomes were based on intermediate markers and found no significant difference between the 2 milk types. In contrast, most ecological studies reported that population-level A1 β-casein exposure is associated with adverse health outcomes. The certainty of the evidence for the included outcomes, as assessed by the GRADE approach, was rated as moderate for digestive symptoms and as low to very low for all other outcomes.
Human-based evidence from clinical trials and epidemiological studies published prior to October 2017 provides moderate certainty for adverse digestive health effects of A1 β-casein compared with A2 β-casein but low or very low certainty for other health effects. These conclusions may change in the future, given the emergent nature of this topic and the ongoing research in this area.
PROSPERO registration number CRD42016043795.
多项流行病学研究表明,摄入牛奶 A1 β-酪蛋白与非传染性慢性疾病的风险之间存在正相关关系。A2 牛奶的消费正在增加,可能是因为 A2 牛奶被认为对消化健康有积极影响。
系统综述旨在调查 A1 β-酪蛋白与人类健康相关结果之间的关联。
系统检索了 5 个电子数据库、3 个临床试验注册处和互联网。
使用预先确定的纳入标准,两名作者独立选择研究 A1 β-酪蛋白或β-酪啡肽-7 摄入/暴露对人类任何健康相关结果的影响。意见分歧通过共识解决。
两名作者独立提取数据并评估偏倚风险。使用 GRADE 方法评估每个结局的证据确定性。意见分歧通过共识解决。
纳入了 15 项随机对照试验、2 项病例对照研究和 8 项生态学研究。大多数研究潜在影响各种结局的随机对照研究和病例对照研究都是基于中间标志物,未发现两种牛奶类型之间有显著差异。相比之下,大多数生态学研究报告称,人群水平的 A1 β-酪蛋白暴露与不良健康结局有关。使用 GRADE 方法评估纳入结局的证据确定性,被评为消化症状的中等确定性,以及所有其他结局的低至非常低确定性。
2017 年 10 月之前发表的基于临床试验和流行病学研究的人类证据,对 A1 β-酪蛋白与 A2 β-酪蛋白相比对不良消化健康影响的证据确定性为中等,但对其他健康影响的证据确定性为低或非常低。考虑到这个主题的新兴性质和该领域正在进行的研究,这些结论将来可能会发生变化。
PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42016043795。