Brooke-Taylor and Co. Consultants, Milawa, Victoria, Australia.
School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Adv Nutr. 2017 Sep 15;8(5):739-748. doi: 10.3945/an.116.013953. Print 2017 Sep.
This is the first systematic review, to our knowledge, of published studies investigating the gastrointestinal effects of A1-type bovine β-casein (A1) compared with A2-type bovine β-casein (A2). The review is relevant to nutrition practice given the increasing availability and promotion in a range of countries of dairy products free of A1 for both infant and adult nutrition. In vitro and in vivo studies (all species) were included. In vivo studies were limited to oral consumption. Inclusion criteria encompassed all English-language primary research studies, but not reviews, involving milk, fresh-milk products, β-casein, and β-casomorphins published through 12 April 2017. Studies involving cheese and fermented milk products were excluded. Only studies with a specific gastrointestinal focus were included. However, inclusion was not delimited by specific gastrointestinal outcome nor by a specific mechanism. Inclusion criteria were satisfied by 39 studies. In vivo consumption of A1 relative to A2 delays intestinal transit in rodents via an opioid-mediated mechanism. Rodent models also link consumption of A1 to the initiation of inflammatory response markers plus enhanced Toll-like receptor expression relative to both A2 and nonmilk controls. Although most rodent responses are confirmed as opioid-mediated, there is evidence that dipeptidyl peptidase 4 stimulation in the jejunum of rodents is via a nonopioid mechanism. In humans, there is evidence from a limited number of studies that A1 consumption is also associated with delayed intestinal transit (1 clinical study) and looser stool consistency (2 clinical studies). In addition, digestive discomfort is correlated with inflammatory markers in humans for A1 but not A2. Further research is required in humans to investigate the digestive function effects of A1 relative to A2 in different populations and dietary settings.
这是首次系统评价,就我们所知,研究了 A1 型牛β-酪蛋白(A1)与 A2 型牛β-酪蛋白(A2)相比对胃肠道影响的已发表研究。鉴于在许多国家,婴幼儿和成人营养用的 A1 无乳制品的供应和推广不断增加,该综述与营养实践相关。纳入了所有物种的体内和体外研究。体内研究仅限于口服摄入。纳入标准包括所有以英语发表的、涉及牛奶、新鲜奶制品、β-酪蛋白和 β-酪啡肽的、针对婴幼儿和成人营养的、涉及 A1 的原始研究,但不包括综述,研究时间截至 2017 年 4 月 12 日。涉及奶酪和发酵乳制品的研究被排除。仅纳入有明确胃肠道焦点的研究。然而,纳入并不局限于特定的胃肠道结果或特定的机制。符合纳入标准的研究有 39 项。与 A2 相比,A1 在体内的消耗通过阿片样物质介导的机制使啮齿动物的肠道转运延迟。啮齿动物模型还将 A1 的消耗与炎症反应标志物的启动以及与 A2 和非乳类对照相比,Toll 样受体表达的增强联系起来。尽管大多数啮齿动物的反应被确认为阿片样物质介导的,但有证据表明,在啮齿动物的空肠中,二肽基肽酶 4的刺激是通过非阿片样物质机制。在人类中,少数研究的证据表明,A1 的消耗也与肠道转运延迟(1 项临床研究)和粪便稠度变稀(2 项临床研究)有关。此外,在人类中,与 A2 相比,A1 的消化不适与炎症标志物相关,但 A2 则不然。需要在不同人群和饮食环境中对 A1 与 A2 相比的消化功能影响进行更多的人类研究。