Ingarfield Kate, McMahon Alex Douglas, Douglas Catriona M, Savage Shirley-Anne, MacKenzie Kenneth, Conway David I
University of Glasgow Dental School, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Front Oncol. 2019 Jan 22;8:673. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00673. eCollection 2018.
Socioeconomic inequalities impact on the survival of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, but there is limited understanding of the explanations of the inequality, particularly in long-term survival. Patients were recruited from the Scottish Audit of Head and Neck Cancer between 1999 and 2001 and were linked to mortality data as at 30th September 2013. Socioeconomic status was determined using the area-based Carstairs 2001 index. Overall and disease-specific survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method with 95% confidence intervals (CI's) at 1-, 5-, and 12-years. Net survival at 1-, 5-, and 12-years was also computed with 95% CIs. Cox proportional hazard models with 95% CIs were used to determine the explanations for the inequality in survival by all-cause mortality and disease-specific mortality with 95% CIs. Most patients were from the most deprived group, and were more likely to smoke, drink, have cancer of a higher stage and have a lower WHO Performance Status. A clear gradient across Carstairs fifths for unadjusted overall and disease-specific survival was observed at 1-, 5-, and 12-years for patients with HNC. Following the adjustment for multiple patient, tumor and treatment factors, the inequality in survival for patients with HNC had attenuated and was no longer statistically significant at 1-, 5-, and 12-years. A clear gradient across Carstairs fifths for unadjusted overall, disease-specific and net survival was observed at 1-, 5-, and 12-years for HNC patients in Scotland from 1999 to 2001. This study concludes that explanations for the inequality in the survival of patients with HNC are not straightforward, and that many factors including various patient, tumor and treatment factors play a part in the inequality in the survival of patients with HNC.
社会经济不平等影响头颈癌(HNC)患者的生存,但对不平等现象的解释了解有限,尤其是在长期生存方面。研究对象为1999年至2001年间从苏格兰头颈癌审计中招募的患者,并与截至2013年9月30日的死亡率数据相关联。使用基于区域的2001年卡斯尔斯指数确定社会经济地位。采用Kaplan-Meier方法计算1年、5年和12年的总体生存率和疾病特异性生存率,并给出95%置信区间(CI)。还计算了1年、5年和12年的净生存率及95%CI。使用带有95%CI的Cox比例风险模型,通过全因死亡率和疾病特异性死亡率来确定生存不平等的解释及95%CI。大多数患者来自最贫困群体,更有可能吸烟、饮酒、患有更高分期的癌症且世界卫生组织(WHO)体能状态较低。在1年、5年和12年时,观察到头颈癌患者未调整的总体生存率和疾病特异性生存率在卡斯尔斯五分位数之间存在明显梯度。在对多个患者、肿瘤和治疗因素进行调整后,头颈癌患者生存的不平等有所减弱,在1年、5年和12年时不再具有统计学意义。在1999年至2001年期间,苏格兰头颈癌患者在1年、5年和12年时,未调整的总体生存率、疾病特异性生存率和净生存率在卡斯尔斯五分位数之间存在明显梯度。本研究得出结论,头颈癌患者生存不平等的解释并不简单,包括各种患者、肿瘤和治疗因素在内的许多因素都对头颈癌患者生存的不平等产生影响。