Suppr超能文献

用于有一次剖宫产史且宫颈条件不佳的产妇引产的球囊导管。

Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix.

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands.

Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jul;98(7):920-928. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13558. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

When women with a previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix have an indication for delivery, the choice is to induce labor or to perform a cesarean section. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of a balloon catheter as a method of induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix compared with an elective repeat cesarean section.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study in 51 hospitals in the Netherlands on term women with one previous cesarean section, a live singleton fetus in cephalic position, an unfavorable cervix and an indication for delivery. We recorded obstetric, maternal and neonatal characteristics. We compared the outcome of women who were induced with a balloon catheter with the outcome of women who delivered by elective repeat cesarean section. Main outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity. Mode of delivery was a secondary outcome for women who were induced. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated using logistic regression, adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Analysis was performed on 993 women who were induced and 321 women who had a repeat cesarean section (August 2011 until September 2012). Among the women who were induced, 560 (56.4%) delivered vaginally and 11 (1.1%) sustained a uterine rupture. Composite adverse maternal outcome (uterine rupture, severe postpartum hemorrhage or postpartum infection) occurred in 73 (7.4%) in the balloon and 14 (4.5%) women in the repeat cesarean section group (aOR 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-2.96). Composite adverse neonatal outcome (Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes or umbilical pH <7.10) occurred in 57 (5.7%) and 10 (3.2%) neonates, respectively (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.87-3.48). Women who were induced had a shorter postpartum admission time (2.0 vs 3.0 days (P < 0.0001)).

CONCLUSIONS

In women with a previous cesarean section and a need for delivery, induction of labor with a balloon catheter does not result in a significant increase in adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes as compared with planned cesarean section.

摘要

简介

当有过剖宫产史且宫颈条件不佳的女性需要分娩时,选择是引产还是行剖宫产。本研究旨在评估与择期再次剖宫产相比,球囊导管在有过一次剖宫产且宫颈条件不佳并需要分娩的女性中作为引产方法的有效性和安全性。

材料和方法

我们在荷兰的 51 家医院进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入的研究对象为足月、有过一次剖宫产史、单胎头位、宫颈条件不佳且需要分娩的活产孕妇。我们记录了产科、产妇和新生儿特征。我们比较了使用球囊导管引产的女性与行择期再次剖宫产的女性的结局。主要结局为产妇和新生儿发病率。对于接受引产的女性,分娩方式为次要结局。使用逻辑回归计算调整后的优势比(aOR),并对潜在混杂因素进行了调整。

结果

2011 年 8 月至 2012 年 9 月期间,我们对 993 名接受引产的女性和 321 名接受再次剖宫产的女性进行了分析。在接受引产的女性中,560 名(56.4%)经阴道分娩,11 名(1.1%)发生子宫破裂。复合不良产妇结局(子宫破裂、产后大出血或产后感染)在球囊组中发生于 73 名(7.4%)女性,在再次剖宫产组中发生于 14 名(4.5%)女性(aOR 1.58,95%CI 0.85-2.96)。复合不良新生儿结局(5 分钟时 Apgar 评分<7 或脐动脉血 pH<7.10)分别发生于 57 名(5.7%)和 10 名(3.2%)新生儿(aOR 1.40,95%CI 0.87-3.48)。接受引产的女性产后住院时间更短(2.0 天 vs 3.0 天(P<0.0001))。

结论

对于有过剖宫产史且需要分娩的女性,与计划行剖宫产相比,球囊导管引产不会显著增加产妇和新生儿不良结局的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aaf/6618009/09681c350cba/AOGS-98-920-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验